linux-x25.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-x25@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drivers/net/wan: lapb: Corrected the usage of skb_cow
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:33:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200724163347.57213-1-xie.he.0141@gmail.com> (raw)

This patch fixed 2 issues with the usage of skb_cow in LAPB drivers
"lapbether" and "hdlc_x25":

1) After skb_cow fails, kfree_skb should be called to drop a reference
to the skb. But in both drivers, kfree_skb is not called.

2) skb_cow should be called before skb_push so that is can ensure the
safety of skb_push. But in "lapbether", it is incorrectly called after
skb_push.

More details about these 2 issues:

1) The behavior of calling kfree_skb on failure is also the behavior of
netif_rx, which is called by this function with "return netif_rx(skb);".
So this function should follow this behavior, too.

2) In "lapbether", skb_cow is called after skb_push. This results in 2
logical issues:
   a) skb_push is not protected by skb_cow;
   b) An extra headroom of 1 byte is ensured after skb_push. This extra
      headroom has no use in this function. It also has no use in the
      upper-layer function that this function passes the skb to
      (x25_lapb_receive_frame in net/x25/x25_dev.c).
So logically skb_cow should instead be called before skb_push.

Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
Signed-off-by: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c  | 4 +++-
 drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c | 8 +++++---
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c b/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c
index c84536b03aa8..f70336bb6f52 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c
@@ -71,8 +71,10 @@ static int x25_data_indication(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	unsigned char *ptr;
 
-	if (skb_cow(skb, 1))
+	if (skb_cow(skb, 1)) {
+		kfree_skb(skb);
 		return NET_RX_DROP;
+	}
 
 	skb_push(skb, 1);
 	skb_reset_network_header(skb);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c b/drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c
index 284832314f31..b2868433718f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c
@@ -128,10 +128,12 @@ static int lapbeth_data_indication(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	unsigned char *ptr;
 
-	skb_push(skb, 1);
-
-	if (skb_cow(skb, 1))
+	if (skb_cow(skb, 1)) {
+		kfree_skb(skb);
 		return NET_RX_DROP;
+	}
+
+	skb_push(skb, 1);
 
 	ptr  = skb->data;
 	*ptr = X25_IFACE_DATA;
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-07-24 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-24 16:33 Xie He [this message]
2020-07-25  3:17 ` [PATCH] drivers/net/wan: lapb: Corrected the usage of skb_cow David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200724163347.57213-1-xie.he.0141@gmail.com \
    --to=xie.he.0141@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-x25@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ms@dev.tdt.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).