From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH 0/8] spi: use 'time_left' instead of 'timeout' with wait_for_*() functions
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:28:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240429112843.67628-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> (raw)
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_*() functions causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
obvious and self explaining.
This is part of a tree-wide series. The rest of the patches can be found here
(some parts may still be WIP):
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/time_left
Because these patches are generated, I audit them before sending. This is why I
will send series step by step. Build bot is happy with these patches, though.
No functional changes intended.
Wolfram Sang (8):
spi: armada-3700: use 'time_left' variable with
wait_for_completion_timeout()
spi: fsl-lpspi: use 'time_left' variable with
wait_for_completion_timeout()
spi: imx: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
spi: pic32-sqi: use 'time_left' variable with
wait_for_completion_timeout()
spi: pic32: use 'time_left' variable with
wait_for_completion_timeout()
spi: sun4i: use 'time_left' variable with
wait_for_completion_timeout()
spi: sun6i: use 'time_left' variable with
wait_for_completion_timeout()
spi: xlp: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
drivers/spi/spi-armada-3700.c | 8 ++++----
drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c | 14 +++++++-------
drivers/spi/spi-imx.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
drivers/spi/spi-pic32-sqi.c | 6 +++---
drivers/spi/spi-pic32.c | 6 +++---
drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c | 9 +++++----
drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c | 17 +++++++++--------
drivers/spi/spi-xlp.c | 8 ++++----
8 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-29 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-29 11:28 Wolfram Sang [this message]
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 6/8] spi: sun4i: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout() Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 12:14 ` Andre Przywara
2024-04-29 15:19 ` Jernej Škrabec
2024-04-29 11:28 ` [PATCH 7/8] spi: sun6i: " Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 12:16 ` Andre Przywara
2024-04-29 14:36 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-04-29 15:20 ` Jernej Škrabec
2024-05-02 3:57 ` [PATCH 0/8] spi: use 'time_left' instead of 'timeout' with wait_for_*() functions Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240429112843.67628-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).