Linux-Sgx Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhiquan Li <zhiquan1.li@intel.com>
To: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: jarkko@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	seanjc@google.com, kai.huang@intel.com, fan.du@intel.com,
	zhiquan1.li@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/sgx: Fine grained SGX MCA behavior for virtualization
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 18:07:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220525100730.760815-1-zhiquan1.li@intel.com> (raw)

When VM guest access a SGX EPC page with memory failure, current
behavior will kill the guest, expected only kill the SGX application
inside it.

To fix it we send SIGBUS with code BUS_MCEERR_AR and some extra
information for hypervisor to inject #MC information to guest, which is
helpful in SGX case.

The rest of things are guest side. Currently the hypervisor like Qemu
already has mature facility to convert HVA to GPA and inject #MC to
the guest OS.

Unlike host enclaves, virtual EPC instance cannot be shared by multiple
VMs.  It is because how enclaves are created is totally up to the guest.
Sharing virtual EPC instance will be very likely to unexpectedly break
enclaves in all VMs.

SGX virtual EPC driver doesn't explicitly prevent virtual EPC instance
being shared by multiple VMs via fork().  However KVM doesn't support
running a VM across multiple mm structures, and the de facto userspace
hypervisor (Qemu) doesn't use fork() to create a new VM, so in practice
this should not happen.

Signed-off-by: Zhiquan Li <zhiquan1.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/443cb425-009c-2784-56f4-5e707122de76@intel.com/T/#m1d1f4098f4fad78034e8706a60e4d79c119db407
---
Changes since V2:
- Retrieve virtual address from "owner" field of struct sgx_epc_page,
  instead of struct sgx_vepc_page.
- Replace EPC page flag SGX_EPC_PAGE_IS_VEPC with
  SGX_EPC_PAGE_KVM_GUEST as they are duplicated.

Changes since V1:
- Add Acked-by from Kai Huang.
- Add Kai’s excellent explanation regarding to why we no need to
  consider that one virtual EPC be shared by two guests.
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
index ab4ec54bbdd9..faca7f73b06d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
@@ -715,6 +715,8 @@ int arch_memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
 	struct sgx_epc_page *page = sgx_paddr_to_page(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
 	struct sgx_epc_section *section;
 	struct sgx_numa_node *node;
+	int ret = 0;
+	unsigned long vaddr;
 
 	/*
 	 * mm/memory-failure.c calls this routine for all errors
@@ -731,8 +733,26 @@ int arch_memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
 	 * error. The signal may help the task understand why the
 	 * enclave is broken.
 	 */
-	if (flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED)
-		force_sig(SIGBUS);
+	if (flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED) {
+		/*
+		 * Provide extra info to the task so that it can make further
+		 * decision but not simply kill it. This is quite useful for
+		 * virtualization case.
+		 */
+		if (page->flags & SGX_EPC_PAGE_KVM_GUEST) {
+			/*
+			 * The "owner" field is repurposed as the virtual address
+			 * of virtual EPC page.
+			 */
+			vaddr = (unsigned long)page->owner & PAGE_MASK;
+			ret = force_sig_mceerr(BUS_MCEERR_AR, (void __user *)vaddr,
+					PAGE_SHIFT);
+			if (ret < 0)
+				pr_err("Memory failure: Error sending signal to %s:%d: %d\n",
+					current->comm, current->pid, ret);
+		} else
+			force_sig(SIGBUS);
+	}
 
 	section = &sgx_epc_sections[page->section];
 	node = section->node;
-- 
2.25.1


                 reply	other threads:[~2022-05-25 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220525100730.760815-1-zhiquan1.li@intel.com \
    --to=zhiquan1.li@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fan.du@intel.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).