Linux-SCTP Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net] sctp: add a refcnt in sctp_stream_priorities to avoid a nested loop
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 19:02:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230223190239.34932117@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <825eb0c905cb864991eba335f4a2b780e543f06b.1677085641.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>

On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 12:07:21 -0500 Xin Long wrote:
> With this refcnt added in sctp_stream_priorities, we don't need to
> traverse all streams to check if the prio is used by other streams
> when freeing one stream's prio in sctp_sched_prio_free_sid(). This
> can avoid a nested loop (up to 65535 * 65535), which may cause a
> stuck as Ying reported:
> 
>     watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#23 stuck for 26s! [ksoftirqd/23:136]
>     Call Trace:
>      <TASK>
>      sctp_sched_prio_free_sid+0xab/0x100 [sctp]
>      sctp_stream_free_ext+0x64/0xa0 [sctp]
>      sctp_stream_free+0x31/0x50 [sctp]
>      sctp_association_free+0xa5/0x200 [sctp]
> 
> Note that it doesn't need to use refcount_t type for this counter,
> as its accessing is always protected under the sock lock.
> 
> v1->v2:
>  - add a check in sctp_sched_prio_set to avoid the possible prio_head
>    refcnt overflow.
> 
> Fixes: 9ed7bfc79542 ("sctp: fix memory leak in sctp_stream_outq_migrate()")
> Reported-by: Ying Xu <yinxu@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>

Applied, thanks!

      reply	other threads:[~2023-02-24  3:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-22 17:07 [PATCHv2 net] sctp: add a refcnt in sctp_stream_priorities to avoid a nested loop Xin Long
2023-02-24  3:02 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230223190239.34932117@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shaozhengchao@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).