Linux-SCSI Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] sd: also set max_user_sectors when setting max_sectors
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 20:26:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240523182618.602003-2-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240523182618.602003-1-hch@lst.de>

sd can set a max_sectors value that is lower than the max_hw_sectors
limit based on the block limits VPD page.   While this is rather unusual,
it used to work until the max_user_sectors field was split out to cleanly
deal with conflicting hardware and user limits when the hardware limit
changes.  Also set max_user_sectors to ensure the limit can properly be
stacked.

Fixes: 4f563a64732d ("block: add a max_user_discard_sectors queue limit")
Reported-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/sd.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index 332eb9dac22d91..f6c822c9cbd2d3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -3700,8 +3700,10 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
 	 */
 	if (sdkp->first_scan ||
 	    q->limits.max_sectors > q->limits.max_dev_sectors ||
-	    q->limits.max_sectors > q->limits.max_hw_sectors)
+	    q->limits.max_sectors > q->limits.max_hw_sectors) {
 		q->limits.max_sectors = rw_max;
+		q->limits.max_user_sectors = rw_max;
+	}
 
 	sdkp->first_scan = 0;
 
-- 
2.43.0


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-23 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-23 18:26 fix stacking of sd-imposed max_sectors Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-23 18:26 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-05-23 18:53   ` [PATCH 1/2] sd: also set max_user_sectors when setting max_sectors Martin K. Petersen
2024-05-24  7:51     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-23 18:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: stack max_user_sectors Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-23 18:54   ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-05-28 12:57 ` fix stacking of sd-imposed max_sectors Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240523182618.602003-2-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).