Re: [PATCH v2] riscv: misaligned: remove CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE specific code - patchwork-bot+linux-riscv

From: patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org
To: =?utf-8?b?Q2zDqW1lbnQgTMOpZ2VyIDxjbGVnZXJAcml2b3NpbmMuY29tPg==?=@ci.codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
	palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk,
	David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, charlie@rivosinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] riscv: misaligned: remove CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE specific code
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 22:00:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <171434163504.22130.15555293049692650403.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240206154104.896809-1-cleger@rivosinc.com>

Hello:

This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next)
by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>:

On Tue,  6 Feb 2024 16:40:59 +0100 you wrote:
> While reworking code to fix sparse errors, it appears that the
> RISCV_M_MODE specific could actually be removed and use the one for
> normal mode. Even though RISCV_M_MODE can do direct user memory access,
> using the user uaccess helpers is also going to work. Since there is no
> need anymore for specific accessors (load_u8()/store_u8()), we can
> directly use memcpy()/copy_{to/from}_user() and get rid of the copy
> loop entirely. __read_insn() is also fixed to use an unsigned long
> instead of a pointer which was cast in __user address space. The
> insn_addr parameter is now cast from unsigned lnog to the correct
> address space directly.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2] riscv: misaligned: remove CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE specific code
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/441381506ba7

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv