From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>,
andersson@kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: remoteproc: xlnx: add sram support
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 07:47:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202405060759.yyzLUQXP-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240502231021.370047-3-tanmay.shah@amd.com>
Hi Tanmay,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 0496190c4d42965acb31b9da1b6dac3509791062]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tanmay-Shah/drivers-remoteproc-xlnx-add-attach-detach-support/20240503-071225
base: 0496190c4d42965acb31b9da1b6dac3509791062
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240502231021.370047-3-tanmay.shah%40amd.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: remoteproc: xlnx: add sram support
config: arm64-randconfig-r113-20240506 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240506/202405060759.yyzLUQXP-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240506/202405060759.yyzLUQXP-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405060759.yyzLUQXP-lkp@intel.com/
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:423:20: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:604:20: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:827:21: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected struct rsc_tbl_data *rsc_data_va @@ got void [noderef] __iomem * @@
drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:827:21: sparse: expected struct rsc_tbl_data *rsc_data_va
drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:827:21: sparse: got void [noderef] __iomem *
drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:844:18: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected struct resource_table *rsc_addr @@ got void [noderef] __iomem * @@
drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:844:18: sparse: expected struct resource_table *rsc_addr
drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:844:18: sparse: got void [noderef] __iomem *
drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:898:24: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr @@ got struct resource_table *rsc_tbl_va @@
drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:898:24: sparse: expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:898:24: sparse: got struct resource_table *rsc_tbl_va
>> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:995:26: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
vim +995 drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
798
799 static int zynqmp_r5_get_rsc_table_va(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
800 {
801 struct device *dev = r5_core->dev;
802 struct rsc_tbl_data *rsc_data_va;
803 struct resource_table *rsc_addr;
804 struct resource res_mem;
805 struct device_node *np;
806 int ret;
807
808 /**
809 * It is expected from remote processor firmware to provide resource
810 * table address via struct rsc_tbl_data data structure.
811 * Start address of first entry under "memory-region" property list
812 * contains that data structure which holds resource table address, size
813 * and some magic number to validate correct resource table entry.
814 */
815 np = of_parse_phandle(r5_core->np, "memory-region", 0);
816 if (!np) {
817 dev_err(dev, "failed to get memory region dev node\n");
818 return -EINVAL;
819 }
820
821 ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res_mem);
822 if (ret) {
823 dev_err(dev, "failed to get memory-region resource addr\n");
824 return -EINVAL;
825 }
826
> 827 rsc_data_va = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, res_mem.start,
828 sizeof(struct rsc_tbl_data));
829 if (!rsc_data_va) {
830 dev_err(dev, "failed to map resource table data address\n");
831 return -EIO;
832 }
833
834 /**
835 * If RSC_TBL_XLNX_MAGIC number and its complement isn't found then
836 * do not consider resource table address valid and don't attach
837 */
838 if (rsc_data_va->magic_num != RSC_TBL_XLNX_MAGIC ||
839 rsc_data_va->comp_magic_num != ~RSC_TBL_XLNX_MAGIC) {
840 dev_dbg(dev, "invalid magic number, won't attach\n");
841 return -EINVAL;
842 }
843
844 rsc_addr = ioremap_wc(rsc_data_va->rsc_tbl,
845 rsc_data_va->rsc_tbl_size);
846 if (!rsc_addr) {
847 dev_err(dev, "failed to get rsc_addr\n");
848 return -EINVAL;
849 }
850
851 /**
852 * As of now resource table version 1 is expected. Don't fail to attach
853 * but warn users about it.
854 */
855 if (rsc_addr->ver != 1)
856 dev_warn(dev, "unexpected resource table version %d\n",
857 rsc_addr->ver);
858
859 r5_core->rsc_tbl_size = rsc_data_va->rsc_tbl_size;
860 r5_core->rsc_tbl_va = rsc_addr;
861
862 return 0;
863 }
864
865 static int zynqmp_r5_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
866 {
867 struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
868 int i, pm_domain_id, ret;
869
870 /*
871 * Firmware is loaded in TCM. Request TCM power domains to notify
872 * platform management controller that TCM is in use. This will be
873 * released during unprepare callback.
874 */
875 for (i = 0; i < r5_core->tcm_bank_count; i++) {
876 pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i]->pm_domain_id;
877 ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
878 ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
879 ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
880 if (ret < 0)
881 pr_warn("TCM %d can't be requested\n", i);
882 }
883
884 return 0;
885 }
886
887 static int zynqmp_r5_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
888 {
889 struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
890
891 /*
892 * Generate last notification to remote after clearing virtio flag.
893 * Remote can avoid polling on virtio reset flag if kick is generated
894 * during detach by host and check virtio reset flag on kick interrupt.
895 */
896 zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick(rproc, 0);
897
898 iounmap(r5_core->rsc_tbl_va);
899 r5_core->rsc_tbl_va = NULL;
900
901 return 0;
902 }
903
904 static const struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = {
905 .prepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare,
906 .unprepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare,
907 .start = zynqmp_r5_rproc_start,
908 .stop = zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop,
909 .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
910 .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw,
911 .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
912 .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
913 .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
914 .kick = zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick,
915 .get_loaded_rsc_table = zynqmp_r5_get_loaded_rsc_table,
916 .attach = zynqmp_r5_attach,
917 .detach = zynqmp_r5_detach,
918 };
919
920 /**
921 * zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core()
922 * Allocate and add struct rproc object for each r5f core
923 * This is called for each individual r5f core
924 *
925 * @cdev: Device node of each r5 core
926 *
927 * Return: zynqmp_r5_core object for success else error code pointer
928 */
929 static struct zynqmp_r5_core *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev)
930 {
931 struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
932 struct rproc *r5_rproc;
933 int ret;
934
935 /* Set up DMA mask */
936 ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(cdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
937 if (ret)
938 return ERR_PTR(ret);
939
940 /* Allocate remoteproc instance */
941 r5_rproc = rproc_alloc(cdev, dev_name(cdev),
942 &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops,
943 NULL, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core));
944 if (!r5_rproc) {
945 dev_err(cdev, "failed to allocate memory for rproc instance\n");
946 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
947 }
948
949 rproc_coredump_set_elf_info(r5_rproc, ELFCLASS32, EM_ARM);
950
951 r5_rproc->auto_boot = false;
952 r5_core = r5_rproc->priv;
953 r5_core->dev = cdev;
954 r5_core->np = dev_of_node(cdev);
955 if (!r5_core->np) {
956 dev_err(cdev, "can't get device node for r5 core\n");
957 ret = -EINVAL;
958 goto free_rproc;
959 }
960
961 /* Add R5 remoteproc core */
962 ret = rproc_add(r5_rproc);
963 if (ret) {
964 dev_err(cdev, "failed to add r5 remoteproc\n");
965 goto free_rproc;
966 }
967
968 /*
969 * Move rproc state to DETACHED to give one time opportunity to attach
970 * if firmware is already available in the memory. This can happen if
971 * firmware is loaded via debugger or by any other agent in the system.
972 * If firmware isn't available in the memory and resource table isn't found,
973 * then rproc state stay OFFLINE.
974 */
975 if (!zynqmp_r5_get_rsc_table_va(r5_core))
976 r5_rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
977
978 r5_core->rproc = r5_rproc;
979 return r5_core;
980
981 free_rproc:
982 rproc_free(r5_rproc);
983 return ERR_PTR(ret);
984 }
985
986 static int zynqmp_r5_get_sram_pd(struct device *r5_core_dev,
987 struct device_node *sram_np, int **power_domains,
988 int *num_pd)
989 {
990 struct of_phandle_args out_args;
991 int pd_count, i, ret;
992 int *pd_list;
993
994 if (!of_find_property(sram_np, "power-domains", NULL)) {
> 995 num_pd = 0;
996 return 0;
997 }
998
999 pd_count = of_count_phandle_with_args(sram_np, "power-domains",
1000 "#power-domain-cells");
1001
1002 pd_list = devm_kcalloc(r5_core_dev, pd_count, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
1003 if (!pd_list)
1004 return -ENOMEM;
1005
1006 for (i = 0; i < pd_count; i++) {
1007 ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(sram_np, "power-domains",
1008 "#power-domain-cells",
1009 i, &out_args);
1010 if (ret) {
1011 dev_err(r5_core_dev, "%s: power-domains idx %d parsing failed\n",
1012 sram_np->name, i);
1013 return ret;
1014 }
1015
1016 of_node_put(out_args.np);
1017 pd_list[i] = out_args.args[0];
1018 }
1019
1020 *power_domains = pd_list;
1021 *num_pd = pd_count;
1022
1023 return 0;
1024 }
1025
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-05 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-02 23:10 [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: xlnx: Add attach detach ops and sram support Tanmay Shah
2024-05-02 23:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] drivers: remoteproc: xlnx: add attach detach support Tanmay Shah
2024-05-05 22:44 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-02 23:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] drivers: remoteproc: xlnx: add sram support Tanmay Shah
2024-05-05 23:47 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202405060759.yyzLUQXP-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tanmay.shah@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).