From: Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@ti.com>
To: Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@ti.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>, <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>,
Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>, Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: k3-r5: Wait for core0 power-up before powering up core1
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 18:17:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230906124756.3480579-1-a-nandan@ti.com> (raw)
PSC controller has a limitation that it can only power-up the second core
when the first core is in ON state. Power-state for core0 should be equal
to or higher than core1, else the kernel is seen hanging during rproc
loading.
Make the powering up of cores sequential, by waiting for the current core
to power-up before proceeding to the next core, with a timeout of 2sec.
Add a wait queue event in k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init call, that will wait
for the current core to be released from reset before proceeding with the
next core.
Fixes: 6dedbd1d5443 ("remoteproc: k3-r5: Add a remoteproc driver for R5F subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@ti.com>
---
kpv report: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/apurvanandan1997/feb3b304121c265b7827be43752b7ae8/raw
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
index ad3415a3851b..ba5e503f7c9c 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
@@ -103,12 +103,14 @@ struct k3_r5_soc_data {
* @dev: cached device pointer
* @mode: Mode to configure the Cluster - Split or LockStep
* @cores: list of R5 cores within the cluster
+ * @core_transition: wait queue to sync core state changes
* @soc_data: SoC-specific feature data for a R5FSS
*/
struct k3_r5_cluster {
struct device *dev;
enum cluster_mode mode;
struct list_head cores;
+ wait_queue_head_t core_transition;
const struct k3_r5_soc_data *soc_data;
};
@@ -128,6 +130,7 @@ struct k3_r5_cluster {
* @atcm_enable: flag to control ATCM enablement
* @btcm_enable: flag to control BTCM enablement
* @loczrama: flag to dictate which TCM is at device address 0x0
+ * @released_from_reset: flag to signal when core is out of reset
*/
struct k3_r5_core {
struct list_head elem;
@@ -144,6 +147,7 @@ struct k3_r5_core {
u32 atcm_enable;
u32 btcm_enable;
u32 loczrama;
+ bool released_from_reset;
};
/**
@@ -460,6 +464,8 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
ret);
return ret;
}
+ core->released_from_reset = true;
+ wake_up_interruptible(&cluster->core_transition);
/*
* Newer IP revisions like on J7200 SoCs support h/w auto-initialization
@@ -1140,6 +1146,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
return ret;
}
+ core->released_from_reset = c_state;
ret = ti_sci_proc_get_status(core->tsp, &boot_vec, &cfg, &ctrl,
&stat);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -1280,6 +1287,21 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU ||
cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE)
break;
+
+ /* R5 cores require to be powered on sequentially, core0
+ * should be in higher power state than core1 in a cluster
+ * So, wait for current core to power up before proceeding
+ * to next core and put timeout of 2sec for each core.
+ */
+ ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(cluster->core_transition,
+ core->released_from_reset,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(2000));
+ if (ret <= 0) {
+ dev_err(dev,
+ "Timed out waiting for %s core to power up!\n",
+ rproc->name);
+ return ret;
+ }
}
return 0;
@@ -1709,6 +1731,7 @@ static int k3_r5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
cluster->dev = dev;
cluster->soc_data = data;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cluster->cores);
+ init_waitqueue_head(&cluster->core_transition);
ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,cluster-mode", &cluster->mode);
if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL) {
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-09-06 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-06 12:47 Apurva Nandan [this message]
2023-09-11 16:45 ` [PATCH] remoteproc: k3-r5: Wait for core0 power-up before powering up core1 Mathieu Poirier
2023-10-04 13:51 ` Apurva Nandan
2023-10-04 17:30 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230906124756.3480579-1-a-nandan@ti.com \
--to=a-nandan@ti.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=devarsht@ti.com \
--cc=hnagalla@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).