From: Nicholas Humfrey <njh@aelius.com>
To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Configuring pppd to accept link-local IPv6 interface id from remote peer
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 01:03:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d529e496-ac5f-9498-0e3d-1fa1ec2c4750@aelius.com> (raw)
Hi,
I originally asked this question on the "Unix and Linux" StackExchange:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/634033/configuring-pppd-to-accept-link-local-ipv6-address-from-remote-peer
But i suspect it is a bit too niche and have not had a response there.
I have two pppd (v2.4.7) instances running, talking to each over over a
serial port link. But I can't work out how to get the 'client' pppd to
accept the link-local IPv6 interface identifier provided by the 'server'
pppd. I am trying to use static addresses so I know the link-local IP
address of the remote peer.
On the 'server' I am running:
pppd file ./ppp-options ipv6 ::1,::2 /dev/ttyAMA0 115200
And on the 'client', I am running:
pppd file ./ppp-options ipv6cp-accept-local /dev/ttyAMA0 115200
This is the contents of ppp-options on both:
nodetach
noauth
persist
local
noip
+ipv6
The pppd man page says:
ipv6cp-accept-local
With this option, pppd will accept the peer's idea of our local
IPv6 interface
identifier, even if the local IPv6 interface identifier was
specified in an option.
But that doesn't seem to be the behaviour I am experiencing.
The client always just uses a locally chosen interface identifier
instead. It was suggested to me to try setting the 'client' local
interface identifier to all-zero but I have not found a way of doing
this through configuration. Or alternatively get the 'server' to Nack
the clients choice of interface identifier - but I'm not sure how to
achieve that with pppd.
I have now managed to get it working by hacking ipv6cp.c to keep the
local identifier as all-zero, by disabling a couple of calls to
eui64_magic_nz. But I am not sure what the proper solution is.
Does there need to be an IPv6 equivalent to 'noipdefault' to use in
conjunction with 'ipv6cp-accept-local'?
Thanks,
nick.
next reply other threads:[~2021-02-14 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-14 1:03 Nicholas Humfrey [this message]
2021-02-14 1:57 ` Configuring pppd to accept link-local IPv6 interface id from remote peer Michael Richardson
2021-02-14 13:42 ` Nicholas Humfrey
2021-02-14 16:23 ` James Carlson
2021-02-14 17:07 ` Kurt Van Dijck
2021-02-14 17:50 ` James Carlson
2021-02-14 21:24 ` Benjamin Cama
2021-02-14 22:46 ` James Carlson
2021-02-14 23:15 ` Benjamin Cama
2021-02-16 0:10 ` Nicholas Humfrey
2021-02-16 10:04 ` Benjamin Cama
2021-02-18 0:18 ` Nicholas Humfrey
2021-02-20 1:13 ` Nicholas Humfrey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d529e496-ac5f-9498-0e3d-1fa1ec2c4750@aelius.com \
--to=njh@aelius.com \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).