From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from m16.mail.163.com (m16.mail.163.com [220.197.31.2]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A13312D74E; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 12:51:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.2 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712667100; cv=none; b=KVV8epURTaC3x1fQZVBrMVoJ096w6P61wBCSnGMVZJfLgoGj3MmFH3vSij7vZw8lUp+3R/b5TguLBhnErpJO4/TfUPItC+IPkyHRRSDeIuFvGgqWw+iPPEJ+isEdOZuC4KKo2wyNL8xbd+ozXFjaZWLf9rvKIrQHTIn2KA64rJQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712667100; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DYX4vIIIOWQc+9yScerhkr5DQdAMibuqO+5fAhz/7SQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=Jl7cXoHS7B0po99Xo2XBiZFUdGor6SmYHjjvFPpBH5HPEZGSFqul+mFwqlkCEgw8FUnvhFe6azG5NCyL0OM/RCtG594UsqPp65Iw3QM0cWcjD+pTNwrWW+V52YFihLHnOAVZCaIXpoRHJyHCroe5BUk83HGy0KJUZQZOoa4t9JY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b=HiYwBjzH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.2 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b="HiYwBjzH" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; bh=WZivz wtwPwc9kG+G0Vu61F+ka3jn+iKxoNnbOmG8MBQ=; b=HiYwBjzHMXzn90wwkRVrs I26kNBLc5BLIhBVnj+TflXJM3u/IJPjjE8n0b7DpAUoIK53jOrz8ak0z6TL6vCqI bGzeKgxk6zaROx2q+2kjlTV9Fwtoz2BDdHi18N3r+EjLldOsUJQNHOpM3f7vJpn+ oDfb/4vrqiMCN9TpwbSlso= Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [101.86.11.106]) by gzga-smtp-mta-g2-5 (Coremail) with SMTP id _____wDXL2GEORVm3QVrAg--.35825S4; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 20:50:47 +0800 (CST) From: Lizhe To: rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lizhe Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: pcc-cpufreq: Remove redundant exit() functions Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 05:50:03 -0700 Message-Id: <20240409125003.3444-1-sensor1010@163.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:_____wDXL2GEORVm3QVrAg--.35825S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvdXoW7Jw1xZF4rGr4ftry5Gr1xZrb_yoWDGrg_C3 y3ur17GrWj9w1DtF17Gr48tryaya12qr1v9F10y39IkF17Ar9Yvr1kWr17WrW8Xw4rGF9r A3y0vF17uw4UAjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUjb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7sREvtAtUUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: 5vhq20jurqiii6rwjhhfrp/1tbiSAe7q2XAk0aYWgAAst The return value of exit() is 0 and it performs no action. This function can be omitted. Please refer to the end condition check in the __cpufreq_offline() function. Signed-off-by: Lizhe --- drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c index 6f8b5ea7aeae..771efbf51a48 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c @@ -562,18 +562,12 @@ static int pcc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) return result; } -static int pcc_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) -{ - return 0; -} - static struct cpufreq_driver pcc_cpufreq_driver = { .flags = CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS, .get = pcc_get_freq, .verify = pcc_cpufreq_verify, .target = pcc_cpufreq_target, .init = pcc_cpufreq_cpu_init, - .exit = pcc_cpufreq_cpu_exit, .name = "pcc-cpufreq", }; -- 2.25.1