patches.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	gor@linux.ibm.com, Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	wintera@linux.ibm.com, twinkler@linux.ibm.com,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] s390/vmlogrdr: Remove function pointer cast
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 21:26:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240506192602.19333-A-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <798df2d7-b13f-482a-8d4a-106c6492af01@app.fastmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 09:46:18PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024, at 17:15, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > That doesn't answer my question what prevents the release function
> > from being called after the module has been unloaded.
> >
> > At least back then when the code was added it was a real bug.
> 
> I think the way this should work is to have the allocation and
> the release function in the iucv bus driver, with a function
> roughly like
> 
> struct device *iucv_alloc_device(char *name,
>                const struct attribute_group *attrs,
>                void *priv)
> {
>       dev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct device), GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (!dev)
>            return NULL;
> 
>       dev_set_name(dev, "%s", name);
>       dev->bus = &iucv_bus;
>       dev->parent = iucv_root;
>       dev->groups = attrs;
>       dev_set_drvdata(dev, priv);
>       dev->release = iucv_free_dev;
>   
>       return dev;
> }
> 
> Now the release function cannot go away as long as any module
> is loaded that links against it, and those modules cannot
> go away as long as the devices are in use.
> 
> I don't remember how iucv works, but if there is a way to
> detect which system services exist, then the actual device
> creation should also be separate from the driver using those
> services, with another driver responsible for enumerating
> the existing services and creating those devices.

So, I finally had a deeper look at this, and it looks like the comment
that says that the release function can be called after the module is
unloaded is not correct (anymore?).

I couldn't find any put_device() calls where not also the module reference
count is increased. So I guess Nathan's patches are just fine.

However given your above suggestion, I implemented an iucv_alloc_device()
function to get rid of quite some code duplication, and the casts as well.

I'll send the series for review.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-06 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-17 18:24 [PATCH 0/3] drivers/s390: Fix instances of -Wcast-function-type-strict Nathan Chancellor
2024-04-17 18:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] s390/vmlogrdr: Remove function pointer cast Nathan Chancellor
2024-04-17 18:55   ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-18  5:56   ` Thomas Huth
2024-04-18  9:54   ` Heiko Carstens
2024-04-18 10:25     ` Heiko Carstens
2024-04-18 14:51       ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-04-18 15:15         ` Heiko Carstens
2024-04-18 15:34           ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-04-18 19:21             ` Heiko Carstens
2024-04-18 20:32               ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-04-18 19:46           ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-19 12:15             ` Heiko Carstens
2024-04-19 12:19               ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-19 14:12                 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-04-23  7:34                   ` Alexandra Winter
2024-05-06 19:26             ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2024-04-17 18:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] s390/smsgiucv_app: " Nathan Chancellor
2024-04-17 18:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-18  5:56   ` Thomas Huth
2024-04-17 18:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] s390/netiucv: " Nathan Chancellor
2024-04-17 18:57   ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-18  5:57   ` Thomas Huth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240506192602.19333-A-hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=twinkler@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).