From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, ming.lei@redhat.com,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: allow unmanaged interrupts
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 07:12:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c75bef55-f3f3-444f-9aa9-d646fd13f73d@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240510151047.GA10486@lst.de>
On 5/10/24 08:10, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 07:14:59AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
>> From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
>>
>> Some people _really_ want to control their interrupt affinity.
>
> So let them argue why. I'd rather have a really, really, really
> good argument for this crap, and I'd like to hear it from the horses
> mouth.
Performance can be increased by modifying the interrupt assignments
carefully, especially in storage appliances that have to process a
large number of network and storage interrupts. By carefully assigning
interrupts the number of completions processed per interrupt can be
increased and hence performance also increases. In 2014 I was working
on a product that benefited from this approach.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-13 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-10 14:14 [PATCH 1/2] genirq/affinity: remove rsvd check against minvec Keith Busch
2024-05-10 14:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: allow unmanaged interrupts Keith Busch
2024-05-10 15:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-10 16:20 ` Keith Busch
2024-05-10 23:50 ` Ming Lei
2024-05-11 0:41 ` Keith Busch
2024-05-11 0:59 ` Ming Lei
2024-05-12 6:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-20 15:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-20 20:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-21 2:31 ` Ming Lei
2024-05-21 8:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-21 10:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-13 7:33 ` Benjamin Meier
2024-05-13 8:39 ` Ming Lei
2024-05-13 8:59 ` Benjamin Meier
2024-05-13 9:25 ` Ming Lei
2024-05-13 12:33 ` Benjamin Meier
2024-05-13 13:12 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2024-05-10 15:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] genirq/affinity: remove rsvd check against minvec Ming Lei
2024-05-10 16:47 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c75bef55-f3f3-444f-9aa9-d646fd13f73d@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).