From: Tianyang Zhang <zhangtianyang@loongson.cn>
To: Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@loongson.cn>,
chenhuacai@kernel.org, jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Baoqi Zhang <zhangbaoqi@loongson.cn>,
Biao Dong <dongbiao@loongson.cn>,
zhoubb.aaron@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] irqchip/loongson-pch-pic: Update interrupt registration policy
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 18:16:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <260541a1-f4c7-2f9b-7a20-9f9c0aea4fdd@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24131107-1e45-415a-b731-c1f97a231e22@loongson.cn>
Hi,Binbin
Thank you for pointing out the problems in this patch. We will adjust
the scheme after the test
Thanks again
在 2024/3/21 下午2:10, Binbin Zhou 写道:
> Hi Tianyang:
>
> On 2024/3/16 16:21, Tianyang Zhang wrote:
>> From: Baoqi Zhang <zhangbaoqi@loongson.cn>
>>
>> This patch remove the fixed mapping between the 7A interrupt source
>> and the HT interrupt vector, and replaced it with a dynamically
>> allocated approach.
>>
>> We introduce a mapping table in struct pch_pic, where each interrupt
>> source will allocate an index as a 'hwirq' from the table in the order
>> of application and set table value as interrupt source number. This
>> hwirq
>> will be configured as its vector in the HT interrupt controller. For an
>> interrupt source, the validity period of the obtained hwirq will last
>> until
>> the system reset
>>
>> This will be more conducive to fully utilizing existing vectors to
>> support more devices
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Baoqi Zhang <zhangbaoqi@loongson.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: Biao Dong <dongbiao@loongson.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: Tianyang Zhang <zhangtianyang@loongson.cn>
>> ---
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-pch-pic.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-pch-pic.c
>> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-pch-pic.c
>> index 63db8e2172e0..f17187641154 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-pch-pic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-pch-pic.c
>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
>> #define PIC_COUNT (PIC_COUNT_PER_REG * PIC_REG_COUNT)
>> #define PIC_REG_IDX(irq_id) ((irq_id) / PIC_COUNT_PER_REG)
>> #define PIC_REG_BIT(irq_id) ((irq_id) % PIC_COUNT_PER_REG)
>> -
>> +#define PIC_UNDEF_VECTOR 255
>> static int nr_pics;
>> struct pch_pic {
>> @@ -46,12 +46,19 @@ struct pch_pic {
>> u32 saved_vec_en[PIC_REG_COUNT];
>> u32 saved_vec_pol[PIC_REG_COUNT];
>> u32 saved_vec_edge[PIC_REG_COUNT];
>> + u8 table[PIC_COUNT];
>> + int inuse;
>> };
>> static struct pch_pic *pch_pic_priv[MAX_IO_PICS];
>> struct fwnode_handle *pch_pic_handle[MAX_IO_PICS];
>> +static inline u8 hwirq_to_bit(struct pch_pic *priv, int hirq)
>> +{
>> + return priv->table[hirq];
>> +}
>> +
>> static void pch_pic_bitset(struct pch_pic *priv, int offset, int bit)
>> {
>> u32 reg;
>> @@ -80,45 +87,47 @@ static void pch_pic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>> {
>> struct pch_pic *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>> - pch_pic_bitset(priv, PCH_PIC_MASK, d->hwirq);
>> + pch_pic_bitset(priv, PCH_PIC_MASK, hwirq_to_bit(priv, d->hwirq));
>> irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
>> }
>> static void pch_pic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>> {
>> struct pch_pic *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>> + int bit = hwirq_to_bit(priv, d->hwirq);
>> - writel(BIT(PIC_REG_BIT(d->hwirq)),
>> - priv->base + PCH_PIC_CLR + PIC_REG_IDX(d->hwirq) * 4);
>> + writel(BIT(PIC_REG_BIT(bit)),
>> + priv->base + PCH_PIC_CLR + PIC_REG_IDX(bit) * 4);
>> irq_chip_unmask_parent(d);
>> - pch_pic_bitclr(priv, PCH_PIC_MASK, d->hwirq);
>> + pch_pic_bitclr(priv, PCH_PIC_MASK, bit);
>> }
>> static int pch_pic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
>> {
>> struct pch_pic *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>> + int bit = hwirq_to_bit(priv, d->hwirq);
>> int ret = 0;
>> switch (type) {
>> case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
>> - pch_pic_bitset(priv, PCH_PIC_EDGE, d->hwirq);
>> - pch_pic_bitclr(priv, PCH_PIC_POL, d->hwirq);
>> + pch_pic_bitset(priv, PCH_PIC_EDGE, bit);
>> + pch_pic_bitclr(priv, PCH_PIC_POL, bit);
>> irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_edge_irq);
>> break;
>> case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
>> - pch_pic_bitset(priv, PCH_PIC_EDGE, d->hwirq);
>> - pch_pic_bitset(priv, PCH_PIC_POL, d->hwirq);
>> + pch_pic_bitset(priv, PCH_PIC_EDGE, bit);
>> + pch_pic_bitset(priv, PCH_PIC_POL, bit);
>> irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_edge_irq);
>> break;
>> case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
>> - pch_pic_bitclr(priv, PCH_PIC_EDGE, d->hwirq);
>> - pch_pic_bitclr(priv, PCH_PIC_POL, d->hwirq);
>> + pch_pic_bitclr(priv, PCH_PIC_EDGE, bit);
>> + pch_pic_bitclr(priv, PCH_PIC_POL, bit);
>> irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_level_irq);
>> break;
>> case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
>> - pch_pic_bitclr(priv, PCH_PIC_EDGE, d->hwirq);
>> - pch_pic_bitset(priv, PCH_PIC_POL, d->hwirq);
>> + pch_pic_bitclr(priv, PCH_PIC_EDGE, bit);
>> + pch_pic_bitset(priv, PCH_PIC_POL, bit);
>> irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_level_irq);
>> break;
>> default:
>> @@ -133,11 +142,12 @@ static void pch_pic_ack_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>> {
>> unsigned int reg;
>> struct pch_pic *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>> + int bit = hwirq_to_bit(priv, d->hwirq);
>> - reg = readl(priv->base + PCH_PIC_EDGE + PIC_REG_IDX(d->hwirq)
>> * 4);
>> - if (reg & BIT(PIC_REG_BIT(d->hwirq))) {
>> - writel(BIT(PIC_REG_BIT(d->hwirq)),
>> - priv->base + PCH_PIC_CLR + PIC_REG_IDX(d->hwirq) * 4);
>> + reg = readl(priv->base + PCH_PIC_EDGE + PIC_REG_IDX(bit) * 4);
>> + if (reg & BIT(PIC_REG_BIT(bit))) {
>> + writel(BIT(PIC_REG_BIT(bit)),
>> + priv->base + PCH_PIC_CLR + PIC_REG_IDX(bit) * 4);
>> }
>> irq_chip_ack_parent(d);
>> }
>> @@ -159,6 +169,8 @@ static int pch_pic_domain_translate(struct
>> irq_domain *d,
>> {
>> struct pch_pic *priv = d->host_data;
>> struct device_node *of_node = to_of_node(fwspec->fwnode);
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + int i;
>> if (of_node) {
>> if (fwspec->param_count < 2)
>> @@ -171,6 +183,27 @@ static int pch_pic_domain_translate(struct
>> irq_domain *d,
>> return -EINVAL;
>> *hwirq = fwspec->param[0] - priv->gsi_base;
>> +
>> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->pic_lock, flags);
>> + /* Check pic-table to confirm if the hwirq has been assigned */
>> + for (i = 0; i < priv->inuse; i++) {
>> + if (priv->table[i] == *hwirq) {
>> + *hwirq = i;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + if (i == priv->inuse) {
>> + /* Assign a new hwirq in pic-table */
>> + if (priv->inuse >= PIC_COUNT) {
>> + pr_err("pch-pic domain has no free vectors\n");
>> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->pic_lock, flags);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + priv->table[priv->inuse] = *hwirq;
>> + *hwirq = priv->inuse++;
>> + }
>> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->pic_lock, flags);
>> +
>
> The patch fails the test on LS2K2000+FDT and does not boot the system
> properly.
>
> The reason the test fails is that this part of the priv->table[]
> initialization is needed for FDT as well, so I think it needs to be
> put after the whole judgment, at the end of the function.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Binbin
>
>> if (fwspec->param_count > 1)
>> *type = fwspec->param[1] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
>> else
>> @@ -194,6 +227,9 @@ static int pch_pic_alloc(struct irq_domain
>> *domain, unsigned int virq,
>> if (err)
>> return err;
>> + /* Write vector ID */
>> + writeb(priv->ht_vec_base + hwirq, priv->base +
>> PCH_INT_HTVEC(hwirq_to_bit(priv, hwirq)));
>> +
>> parent_fwspec.fwnode = domain->parent->fwnode;
>> parent_fwspec.param_count = 1;
>> parent_fwspec.param[0] = hwirq + priv->ht_vec_base;
>> @@ -222,7 +258,7 @@ static void pch_pic_reset(struct pch_pic *priv)
>> for (i = 0; i < PIC_COUNT; i++) {
>> /* Write vector ID */
>> - writeb(priv->ht_vec_base + i, priv->base + PCH_INT_HTVEC(i));
>> + writeb(priv->ht_vec_base + i, priv->base +
>> PCH_INT_HTVEC(hwirq_to_bit(priv, i)));
>> /* Hardcode route to HT0 Lo */
>> writeb(1, priv->base + PCH_INT_ROUTE(i));
>> }
>> @@ -284,6 +320,7 @@ static int pch_pic_init(phys_addr_t addr,
>> unsigned long size, int vec_base,
>> u32 gsi_base)
>> {
>> struct pch_pic *priv;
>> + int i;
>> priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!priv)
>> @@ -294,6 +331,10 @@ static int pch_pic_init(phys_addr_t addr,
>> unsigned long size, int vec_base,
>> if (!priv->base)
>> goto free_priv;
>> + priv->inuse = 0;
>> + for (i = 0; i < PIC_COUNT; i++)
>> + priv->table[i] = PIC_UNDEF_VECTOR;
>> +
>> priv->ht_vec_base = vec_base;
>> priv->vec_count = ((readq(priv->base) >> 48) & 0xff) + 1;
>> priv->gsi_base = gsi_base;
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-22 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-16 8:21 [PATCH V2] irqchip/loongson-pch-pic: Update interrupt registration policy Tianyang Zhang
2024-03-16 14:03 ` Christophe JAILLET
2024-03-18 11:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-03-19 11:26 ` Tianyang Zhang
2024-03-18 14:35 ` Huacai Chen
2024-03-19 11:18 ` Tianyang Zhang
2024-03-21 6:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Binbin Zhou
2024-03-22 10:16 ` Tianyang Zhang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=260541a1-f4c7-2f9b-7a20-9f9c0aea4fdd@loongson.cn \
--to=zhangtianyang@loongson.cn \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=dongbiao@loongson.cn \
--cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zhangbaoqi@loongson.cn \
--cc=zhoubb.aaron@gmail.com \
--cc=zhoubinbin@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).