Linux-IIO Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
Cc: Nuno Sa via B4 Relay  <devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org>,
	nuno.sa@analog.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] iio: adc: adi-axi-adc: support digital interface calibration
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 16:49:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240428164951.0651845e@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96d226df0670cdfc307aacb196bea13e1ad644ad.camel@gmail.com>

On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 09:27:26 +0200
Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 16:13 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:36:49 +0200
> > Nuno Sa via B4 Relay <devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org> wrote:
> >   
> > > From: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> > > 
> > > Implement the new IIO backend APIs for calibrating the data
> > > digital interfaces.
> > > 
> > > While at it, removed the tabs in 'struct adi_axi_adc_state' and used
> > > spaces for the members.  
> > 
> > Ideally a precursor patch, but meh, it's 2 lines so I'll just moan about
> > it and move on.
> > 
> > A few minor things inline.
> > 
> >   
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/iio/adc/adi-axi-adc.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 111 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/adi-axi-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/adi-axi-adc.c
> > > index b312369b7366..d58fa05499c4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/adi-axi-adc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/adi-axi-adc.c
> > > @@ -7,11 +7,13 @@
> > >   */
> > >  
> > >  #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > > +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> > >  #include <linux/clk.h>
> > >  #include <linux/err.h>
> > >  #include <linux/io.h>
> > >  #include <linux/delay.h>
> > >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > >  #include <linux/of.h>
> > >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > >  #include <linux/property.h>
> > > @@ -37,6 +39,9 @@
> > >  #define   ADI_AXI_REG_RSTN_MMCM_RSTN		BIT(1)
> > >  #define   ADI_AXI_REG_RSTN_RSTN			BIT(0)
> > >  
> > > +#define ADI_AXI_ADC_REG_CTRL			0x0044
> > > +#define    ADI_AXI_ADC_CTRL_DDR_EDGESEL_MASK	BIT(1)
> > > +
> > >  /* ADC Channel controls */
> > >  
> > >  #define ADI_AXI_REG_CHAN_CTRL(c)		(0x0400 + (c) * 0x40)
> > > @@ -51,14 +56,28 @@
> > >  #define   ADI_AXI_REG_CHAN_CTRL_PN_TYPE_OWR	BIT(1)
> > >  #define   ADI_AXI_REG_CHAN_CTRL_ENABLE		BIT(0)
> > >  
> > > +#define ADI_AXI_ADC_REG_CHAN_STATUS(c)		(0x0404 + (c) * 0x40)
> > > +#define   ADI_AXI_ADC_CHAN_STAT_PN_MASK		GENMASK(2, 1)
> > > +
> > > +#define ADI_AXI_ADC_REG_CHAN_CTRL_3(c)		(0x0418 + (c) * 0x40)
> > > +#define   ADI_AXI_ADC_CHAN_PN_SEL_MASK		GENMASK(19, 16)
> > > +
> > > +/* IO Delays */
> > > +#define ADI_AXI_ADC_REG_DELAY(l)		(0x0800 + (l) * 0x4)
> > > +#define   AXI_ADC_DELAY_CTRL_MASK		GENMASK(4, 0)
> > > +
> > > +#define ADI_AXI_ADC_MAX_IO_NUM_LANES		15
> > > +
> > >  #define ADI_AXI_REG_CHAN_CTRL_DEFAULTS		\
> > >  	(ADI_AXI_REG_CHAN_CTRL_FMT_SIGNEXT |	\
> > >  	 ADI_AXI_REG_CHAN_CTRL_FMT_EN |		\
> > >  	 ADI_AXI_REG_CHAN_CTRL_ENABLE)
> > >  
> > >  struct adi_axi_adc_state {
> > > -	struct regmap				*regmap;
> > > -	struct device				*dev;
> > > +	struct regmap *regmap;
> > > +	struct device *dev;
> > > +	/* lock to protect multiple accesses to the device registers */  
> > 
> > Why?  The locking in regmap protects register accesses in general I believe.
> > I guess this is to prevent accesses during that error detection routine?
> > Needs more detail in the comment.  
> 
> Yes, but if you have, for example, two regmap_*() calls in a row you won't have the
> complete access protected as regmap only internally protects each call. And often,
> trying to argue which of these multiple accesses are safe or not is very subtle and
> prone to issues. That's why I used the "multiple accesses" wording.

Ah.  You meant protecting a sequence of multiple accesses. I was thinking 'against'
multiple simultaneous accesses.  I'm fine with your intended meaning. Perhaps
we just need to refer to sequences of access or something like that.

> 
> As you pointed out, the error detection routine should indeed be atomic. On the
> iodelay_set() we also have a read after write and this is one of those cases I'm not
> sure we could actually have an issue if we have concurrent calls (maybe not), But for
> correctness, it definitely makes sense for it to be atomic (as we should check we
> could set the value we just wrote and not something else).
> 
> Also, on a second look, the enable/disable() routines should also be protected (for
> correctness). If we think on the theoretical (in practice it should not happen :))
> case of concurrent enable/disable() calls, we should not be able to disable the core
> in the middle of enabling (either before or after).

Protection makes sense, I was just moaning about the meaning of the comment :)

Jonathan


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-28 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-19 15:36 [PATCH 0/8] iio: ad9467: support interface tuning Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-04-19 15:36 ` [PATCH 1/8] iio: backend: add API for " Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-04-20 15:00   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-22 15:40     ` Nuno Sá
2024-04-22 17:13       ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-23  7:52         ` Nuno Sá
2024-04-28 15:46           ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-19 15:36 ` [PATCH 2/8] iio: adc: adi-axi-adc: only error out in major version mismatch Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-04-20 15:02   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-19 15:36 ` [PATCH 3/8] dt-bindings: adc: axi-adc: add clocks property Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-04-19 16:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-20 15:04   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-22 15:06     ` Nuno Sá
2024-04-22 17:09       ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-19 15:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] iio: adc: axi-adc: make sure AXI clock is enabled Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-04-20 15:04   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-19 15:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] iio: adc: adi-axi-adc: remove regmap max register Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-04-19 15:36 ` [PATCH 6/8] iio: adc: adi-axi-adc: support digital interface calibration Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-04-20 15:13   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-23  7:27     ` Nuno Sá
2024-04-28 15:49       ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-04-19 15:36 ` [PATCH 7/8] iio: adc: ad9467: cache the sample rate Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-04-20 15:19   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-22 15:46     ` Nuno Sá
2024-04-22 17:08       ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-19 15:36 ` [PATCH 8/8] iio: adc: ad9467: support digital interface calibration Nuno Sa via B4 Relay
2024-04-20 15:34   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-23  7:32     ` Nuno Sá
2024-04-20 15:39 ` [PATCH 0/8] iio: ad9467: support interface tuning Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240428164951.0651845e@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=alexandru.ardelean@analog.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=olivier.moysan@foss.st.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).