Linux-ide Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* whitelist entry for device with known good pata-sata bridge
@ 2012-07-25 14:49 Michael Eitelwein
  2012-08-17 17:39 ` Jeff Garzik
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Eitelwein @ 2012-07-25 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: linux-ide

Hi

I have an external SATA drive that was slowed down by bridge limits. I
found a solution in a thread on this list posted in 2008: It introduces
whitelist entries in libata-core.c for devices with well working bridges
(e.g. email on Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:45:27 -0400).

I added my device to this whitelist in a custom built kernel and it
works fine for weeks now. How can I have this device added on the
whitelist within the official kernel? Is this whitelist mechanism still
supported or is there a smarter way to achieve whitelisting?

I added the following whitelist entry for my Buffalo DriveStation
Quattro "BUFFALO HD-QSU2/R5":

        /* Devices that do not need bridging limits applied */
        { "MTRON MSP-SATA*",            NULL,   ATA_HORKAGE_BRIDGE_OK, },
        { "BUFFALO HD-QSU2/R5",         NULL,   ATA_HORKAGE_BRIDGE_OK, },

Regards

Michael


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: whitelist entry for device with known good pata-sata bridge
  2012-07-25 14:49 whitelist entry for device with known good pata-sata bridge Michael Eitelwein
@ 2012-08-17 17:39 ` Jeff Garzik
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2012-08-17 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Michael Eitelwein; +Cc: linux-ide

On 07/25/2012 10:49 AM, Michael Eitelwein wrote:
> I have an external SATA drive that was slowed down by bridge limits. I
> found a solution in a thread on this list posted in 2008: It introduces
> whitelist entries in libata-core.c for devices with well working bridges
> (e.g. email on Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:45:27 -0400).
>
> I added my device to this whitelist in a custom built kernel and it
> works fine for weeks now. How can I have this device added on the
> whitelist within the official kernel? Is this whitelist mechanism still
> supported or is there a smarter way to achieve whitelisting?
>
> I added the following whitelist entry for my Buffalo DriveStation
> Quattro "BUFFALO HD-QSU2/R5":
>
>          /* Devices that do not need bridging limits applied */
>          { "MTRON MSP-SATA*",            NULL,   ATA_HORKAGE_BRIDGE_OK, },
>          { "BUFFALO HD-QSU2/R5",         NULL,   ATA_HORKAGE_BRIDGE_OK, },

added to quirk list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-17 17:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-25 14:49 whitelist entry for device with known good pata-sata bridge Michael Eitelwein
2012-08-17 17:39 ` Jeff Garzik

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).