linux-hotplug.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: The future of the udev source tree
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:15:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPXgP110RNdjNqJtd7w=oSbLVM9XcspM2SMD_SjE8JmktEBtbQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

We are about to merge the udev sources into the systemd source tree.
After that, the next version of systemd will continue with udev’s
version numbering, i.e. jump immediately from 45 to 184.

After udev is merged into the systemd tree you can still build it for
usage outside of systemd systems, and we will support these builds
officially. In fact, we will be supporting this for a long time since
it is a necessity to make initrds (which lack systemd) work properly.
Distributions not wishing to adopt systemd can build udev pretty much
the same way as before, however should then use the systemd tarball
instead of the udev tarball and package only what is necessary of the
resulting build.

Today, ‘Init’ needs to be fully hotplug-capable; udev device
management and knowledge about device lifecycles is an integral part
of systemd and not an isolated logic. Due to this, and to minimize our
administrative workload, as well as to minimize duplication of code,
and to resolve cyclic build dependencies in the core OS, we have
decided to merge the two projects.

The udev built from the systemd source tree will stay compatible with
non-systemd init systems for a long time. This change is mostly a
detail of the build scheme, rather than a change of direction or
interfaces. Accordingly, the libudev API is untouched by these build
infrastructure changes. For us, compatibility is key.

             reply	other threads:[~2012-04-03 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-03 16:15 Kay Sievers [this message]
2012-04-03 16:18 ` The future of the udev source tree Greg KH
2012-04-03 16:22 ` Kay Sievers
2012-04-03 17:16 ` Tom Gundersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPXgP110RNdjNqJtd7w=oSbLVM9XcspM2SMD_SjE8JmktEBtbQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=kay@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).