From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: WARN when f_count resurrection is attempted
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 12:38:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240506103848.GN40213@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240503201620.work.651-kees@kernel.org>
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 01:16:25PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> It should never happen that get_file() is called on a file with
> f_count equal to zero. If this happens, a use-after-free condition
> has happened[1], and we need to attempt a best-effort reporting of
> the situation to help find the root cause more easily. Additionally,
> this serves as a data corruption indicator that system owners using
> warn_limit or panic_on_warn would like to have detected.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7c41cf3c-2a71-4dbb-8f34-0337890906fc@gmail.com/ [1]
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> include/linux/fs.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 00fc429b0af0..fa9ea5390f33 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1038,7 +1038,8 @@ struct file_handle {
>
> static inline struct file *get_file(struct file *f)
> {
> - atomic_long_inc(&f->f_count);
> + long prior = atomic_long_fetch_inc_relaxed(&f->f_count);
> + WARN_ONCE(!prior, "struct file::f_count incremented from zero; use-after-free condition present!\n");
This reminds me, I should some day try and fix the horrible code-gen for
WARN() :/ WARN_ON_*() and friends turn into a single trap instruction,
but the WARN() and friends thing turns into a horrible piece of crap for
the printk().
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-06 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-03 20:16 [PATCH] fs: WARN when f_count resurrection is attempted Kees Cook
2024-05-04 9:43 ` Christian Brauner
2024-05-06 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240506103848.GN40213@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).