From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@gmail.com>,
alexjlzheng@tencent.com, bfoster@redhat.com, david@fromorbit.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: About the conflict between XFS inode recycle and VFS rcu-walk
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 10:36:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240520173638.GB25518@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3545f78c-5e1c-4328-8ab0-19227005f4b7@themaw.net>
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 03:23:40PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>
> On 16/5/24 15:08, Ian Kent wrote:
> > On 16/5/24 12:56, Jinliang Zheng wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 23:54:41 +0800, Jinliang Zheng wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 11:30:18 -0800, djwong@kernel.org wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:35:17PM +0800, Jinliang Zheng wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 11:14:32 +1100, david@fromorbit.com wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 07:38:33PM +0800,
> > > > > > > alexjlzheng@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi, all
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I would like to ask if the conflict between xfs
> > > > > > > > inode recycle and vfs rcu-walk
> > > > > > > > which can lead to null pointer references has been resolved?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I browsed through emails about the following
> > > > > > > > patches and their discussions:
> > > > > > > > - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20220217172518.3842951-2-bfoster@redhat.com/
> > > > > > > > - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20220121142454.1994916-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
> > > > > > > > - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/164180589176.86426.501271559065590169.stgit@mickey.themaw.net/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And then came to the conclusion that this
> > > > > > > > problem has not been solved, am I
> > > > > > > > right? Did I miss some patch that could solve this problem?
> > > > > > > We fixed the known problems this caused by turning off the VFS
> > > > > > > functionality that the rcu pathwalks kept tripping over. See commit
> > > > > > > 7b7820b83f23 ("xfs: don't expose internal symlink
> > > > > > > metadata buffers to
> > > > > > > the vfs").
> > > > > > Sorry for the delay.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The problem I encountered in the production environment
> > > > > > was that during the
> > > > > > rcu walk process the ->get_link() pointer was NULL,
> > > > > > which caused a crash.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As far as I know, commit 7b7820b83f23 ("xfs: don't
> > > > > > expose internal symlink
> > > > > > metadata buffers to the vfs") first appeared in:
> > > > > > - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/YZvvP9RFXi3%2FjX0q@bfoster/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does this commit solve the problem of NULL ->get_link()? And how?
> > > > > I suggest reading the call stack from wherever the VFS enters the XFS
> > > > > readlink code. If you have a reliable reproducer, then
> > > > > apply this patch
> > > > > to your kernel (you haven't mentioned which one it is) and see if the
> > > > > bad dereference goes away.
> > > > >
> > > > > --D
> > > > Sorry for the delay.
> > > >
> > > > I encountered the following calltrace:
> > > >
> > > > [20213.578756] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
> > > > 0000000000000000
> > > > [20213.578785] #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode
> > > > [20213.578799] #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page
> > > > [20213.578812] PGD 3f01d64067 P4D 3f01d64067 PUD 3f01d65067 PMD 0
> > > > [20213.578828] Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP NOPTI
> > > > [20213.578839] CPU: 92 PID: 766 Comm: /usr/local/serv Kdump:
> > > > loaded Not tainted 5.4.241-1-tlinux4-0017.3 #1
> > > > [20213.578860] Hardware name: New H3C Technologies Co., Ltd.
> > > > UniServer R4900 G3/RS33M2C9SA, BIOS 2.00.38P02 04/14/2020
> > > > [20213.578884] RIP: 0010:0x0
> > > > [20213.578894] Code: Bad RIP value.
> > > > [20213.578903] RSP: 0018:ffffc90021ebfc38 EFLAGS: 00010246
> > > > [20213.578916] RAX: ffffffff82081f40 RBX: ffffc90021ebfce0 RCX:
> > > > 0000000000000000
> > > > [20213.578932] RDX: ffffc90021ebfd48 RSI: ffff88bfad8d3890 RDI:
> > > > 0000000000000000
> > > > [20213.578948] RBP: ffffc90021ebfc70 R08: 0000000000000001 R09:
> > > > ffff889b9eeae380
> > > > [20213.578965] R10: 302d343200000067 R11: 0000000000000001 R12:
> > > > 0000000000000000
> > > > [20213.578981] R13: ffff88bfad8d3890 R14: ffff889b9eeae380 R15:
> > > > ffffc90021ebfd48
> > > > [20213.578998] FS: 00007f89c534e740(0000)
> > > > GS:ffff88c07fd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > > [20213.579016] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > > > [20213.579030] CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 0000003f01d90001 CR4:
> > > > 00000000007706e0
> > > > [20213.579046] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
> > > > 0000000000000000
> > > > [20213.579062] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7:
> > > > 0000000000000400
> > > > [20213.579079] PKRU: 55555554
> > > > [20213.579087] Call Trace:
> > > > [20213.579099] trailing_symlink+0x1da/0x260
> > > > [20213.579112] path_lookupat.isra.53+0x79/0x220
> > > > [20213.579125] filename_lookup.part.69+0xa0/0x170
> > > > [20213.579138] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x3f/0x3f0
> > > > [20213.579151] ? getname_flags+0x4f/0x1e0
> > > > [20213.579161] user_path_at_empty+0x3e/0x50
> > > > [20213.579172] vfs_statx+0x76/0xe0
> > > > [20213.579182] __do_sys_newstat+0x3d/0x70
> > > > [20213.579194] ? fput+0x13/0x20
> > > > [20213.579203] ? ksys_ioctl+0xb0/0x300
> > > > [20213.579213] ? generic_file_llseek+0x24/0x30
> > > > [20213.579225] ? fput+0x13/0x20
> > > > [20213.579233] ? ksys_lseek+0x8d/0xb0
> > > > [20213.579243] __x64_sys_newstat+0x16/0x20
> > > > [20213.579256] do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x140
> > > > [20213.579268] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x5c/0xc1
> > > >
> > > > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> > > >
> > > Please note that the kernel version I use is the one maintained by
> > > Tencent.Inc,
> > > and the baseline is v5.4. But in fact, in the latest upstream source
> > > tree,
> > > although the trailing_symlink() function has been removed, its logic
> > > has been
> > > moved to pick_link(), so the problem still exists.
> > >
> > > Ian Kent pointed out that try_to_unlazy() was introduced in
> > > pick_link() in the
> > > latest upstream source tree, but I don't understand why this can
> > > solve the NULL
> > > ->get_link pointer dereference problem, because ->get_link pointer
> > > will be
> > > dereferenced before try_to_unlazy().
> > >
> > > (I don't understand why Ian Kent's email didn't appear on the
> > > mailing list.)
> >
> > It was something about html mail and I think my mail client was at fault.
> >
> > In any case what you say is indeed correct, so the comment isn't
> > important.
> >
> >
> > Fact is it is still a race between the lockless path walk and inode
> > eviction
> >
> > and xfs recycling. I believe that the xfs recycling code is very hard to
> > fix.
> >
> >
> > IIRC correctly putting a NULL check in pick_link() was not considered
> > acceptable
> >
> > but there must be a way that is acceptable to check this and restart the
> > walk.
> >
> > Maybe there was a reluctance to suffer the overhead of restarting the
> > walk when
> >
> > it shouldn't be needed.
>
> Or perhaps the worry was that if it can become NULL it could also become a
> pointer to a
>
> different (incorrect) link altogether which could have really odd/unpleasant
> outcomes.
Yuck. I think that means that we can't reallocate freed inodes until
the rcu grace period expires. For inodes that haven't been evicted, I
think that also means we cannot recycle cached inodes until after an rcu
grace period expires; or maybe that we cannot reset i_op/i_fop and must
not leave the incore state in an inconsistent format?
--D
>
> >
> >
> > The alternative would be to find some way to identify when it's unsafe
> > to reuse
> >
> > an inode marked for re-cycle before dropping rcu read, perhaps with the
> > reference
> >
> > count plus the seqlock. Basically, to reuse inodes xfs will need to
> > identify when
> >
> > the race occurs and let the inode go away under rcu and create a new one
> > if a race
> >
> > is detected. But possibly that isn't nearly as simple as it sounds?
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jinliang Zheng
> > >
> > > > And I analyzed the disassembly of trailing_symlink() and
> > > > confirmed that a NULL
> > > > ->get_link() happened here:
> > > >
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4850 <trailing_symlink>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
> > > > [FTRACE NOP]
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4855 <trailing_symlink+0x5>: push %rbp
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4856 <trailing_symlink+0x6>: mov %rsp,%rbp
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4859 <trailing_symlink+0x9>: push %r15
> > > > 0xffffffff812e485b <trailing_symlink+0xb>: push %r14
> > > > 0xffffffff812e485d <trailing_symlink+0xd>: push %r13
> > > > 0xffffffff812e485f <trailing_symlink+0xf>: push %r12
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4861 <trailing_symlink+0x11>: push %rbx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4862 <trailing_symlink+0x12>: mov
> > > > %rdi,%rbx # rbx = &nameidate
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4865 <trailing_symlink+0x15>: sub $0x8,%rsp
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4869 <trailing_symlink+0x19>: mov
> > > > 0x1765845(%rip),%edx # 0xffffffff82a4a0b4
> > > > <sysctl_protected_symlinks>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e486f <trailing_symlink+0x1f>: mov 0x38(%rdi),%eax
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4872 <trailing_symlink+0x22>: test %edx,%edx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4874 <trailing_symlink+0x24>: je
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48ac <trailing_symlink+0x5c>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4876 <trailing_symlink+0x26>: mov %gs:0x1ad00,%rdx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e487f <trailing_symlink+0x2f>: mov
> > > > 0xc8(%rdi),%rcx # rcx = nameidata->link_inode
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4886 <trailing_symlink+0x36>: mov 0xc18(%rdx),%rdx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e488d <trailing_symlink+0x3d>: mov
> > > > 0x4(%rcx),%ecx # ecx = link_inode->uid
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4890 <trailing_symlink+0x40>: cmp %ecx,0x1c(%rdx)
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4893 <trailing_symlink+0x43>: je
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48ac <trailing_symlink+0x5c>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4895 <trailing_symlink+0x45>: mov 0x30(%rdi),%rsi
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4899 <trailing_symlink+0x49>: movzwl (%rsi),%edx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e489c <trailing_symlink+0x4c>: and $0x202,%dx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48a1 <trailing_symlink+0x51>: cmp $0x202,%dx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48a6 <trailing_symlink+0x56>: je
> > > > 0xffffffff812e495f <trailing_symlink+0x10f>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48ac <trailing_symlink+0x5c>: or $0x10,%eax
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48af <trailing_symlink+0x5f>: mov
> > > > %eax,0x38(%rbx) # nd->flags |= LOOKUP_PARENT
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48b2 <trailing_symlink+0x62>: mov
> > > > 0x50(%rbx),%rax # rax = nd->stack
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48b6 <trailing_symlink+0x66>: movq
> > > > $0x0,0x20(%rax) # stack[0].name = NULL
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48be <trailing_symlink+0x6e>: mov
> > > > 0x48(%rbx),%eax # nd->depth
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48c1 <trailing_symlink+0x71>: mov
> > > > 0x50(%rbx),%rdx # nd->stack
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48c5 <trailing_symlink+0x75>: mov
> > > > 0xc8(%rbx),%r13 # nd->link_inode
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48cc <trailing_symlink+0x7c>: lea
> > > > (%rax,%rax,2),%rax # rax = depth * 3
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48d0 <trailing_symlink+0x80>: shl
> > > > $0x4,%rax # rax = rax << 4, sizeof(saved):0x30
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48d4 <trailing_symlink+0x84>: lea
> > > > -0x30(%rdx,%rax,1),%r15 # r15 = last
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48d9 <trailing_symlink+0x89>: mov
> > > > 0x8(%r15),%r14 # r14 = last->link.dentry
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48dd <trailing_symlink+0x8d>: testb $0x40,0x38(%rbx)
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48e1 <trailing_symlink+0x91>: je
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4950 <trailing_symlink+0x100>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48e3 <trailing_symlink+0x93>: mov %r13,%rsi
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48e6 <trailing_symlink+0x96>: mov %r15,%rdi
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48e9 <trailing_symlink+0x99>: callq
> > > > 0xffffffff812f8a00 <atime_needs_update>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48ee <trailing_symlink+0x9e>: test %al,%al
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48f0 <trailing_symlink+0xa0>: jne
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a56 <trailing_symlink+0x206>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48f6 <trailing_symlink+0xa6>: mov 0x38(%rbx),%edx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48f9 <trailing_symlink+0xa9>: mov %r13,%rsi
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48fc <trailing_symlink+0xac>: mov %r14,%rdi
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48ff <trailing_symlink+0xaf>: shr $0x6,%edx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4902 <trailing_symlink+0xb2>: and $0x1,%edx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4905 <trailing_symlink+0xb5>: callq
> > > > 0xffffffff81424310 <security_inode_follow_link>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e490a <trailing_symlink+0xba>: movslq %eax,%r12
> > > > 0xffffffff812e490d <trailing_symlink+0xbd>: test %eax,%eax
> > > > 0xffffffff812e490f <trailing_symlink+0xbf>: jne
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4939 <trailing_symlink+0xe9>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4911 <trailing_symlink+0xc1>: movl $0x4,0x44(%rbx)
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4918 <trailing_symlink+0xc8>: mov 0x248(%r13),%r12
> > > > 0xffffffff812e491f <trailing_symlink+0xcf>: test %r12,%r12
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4922 <trailing_symlink+0xd2>: je
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49e5 <trailing_symlink+0x195>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4928 <trailing_symlink+0xd8>: movzbl (%r12),%eax
> > > > 0xffffffff812e492d <trailing_symlink+0xdd>: cmp $0x2f,%al
> > > > 0xffffffff812e492f <trailing_symlink+0xdf>: je
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49b7 <trailing_symlink+0x167>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4935 <trailing_symlink+0xe5>: test %al,%al
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4937 <trailing_symlink+0xe7>: je
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49ae <trailing_symlink+0x15e>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4939 <trailing_symlink+0xe9>: test %r12,%r12
> > > > 0xffffffff812e493c <trailing_symlink+0xec>: je
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49ae <trailing_symlink+0x15e>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e493e <trailing_symlink+0xee>: add $0x8,%rsp
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4942 <trailing_symlink+0xf2>: mov %r12,%rax
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4945 <trailing_symlink+0xf5>: pop %rbx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4946 <trailing_symlink+0xf6>: pop %r12
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4948 <trailing_symlink+0xf8>: pop %r13
> > > > 0xffffffff812e494a <trailing_symlink+0xfa>: pop %r14
> > > > 0xffffffff812e494c <trailing_symlink+0xfc>: pop %r15
> > > > 0xffffffff812e494e <trailing_symlink+0xfe>: pop %rbp
> > > > 0xffffffff812e494f <trailing_symlink+0xff>: retq
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4950 <trailing_symlink+0x100>: mov %r15,%rdi
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4953 <trailing_symlink+0x103>: callq
> > > > 0xffffffff812f8ae0 <touch_atime>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4958 <trailing_symlink+0x108>: callq
> > > > 0xffffffff81a26410 <_cond_resched>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e495d <trailing_symlink+0x10d>: jmp
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48f6 <trailing_symlink+0xa6>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e495f <trailing_symlink+0x10f>: mov 0x4(%rsi),%edx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4962 <trailing_symlink+0x112>: cmp $0xffffffff,%edx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4965 <trailing_symlink+0x115>: je
> > > > 0xffffffff812e496f <trailing_symlink+0x11f>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4967 <trailing_symlink+0x117>: cmp %edx,%ecx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4969 <trailing_symlink+0x119>: je
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48ac <trailing_symlink+0x5c>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e496f <trailing_symlink+0x11f>: mov
> > > > $0xfffffffffffffff6,%r12
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4976 <trailing_symlink+0x126>: test $0x40,%al
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4978 <trailing_symlink+0x128>: jne
> > > > 0xffffffff812e493e <trailing_symlink+0xee>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e497a <trailing_symlink+0x12a>: mov %gs:0x1ad00,%rax
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4983 <trailing_symlink+0x133>: mov 0xce0(%rax),%rax
> > > > 0xffffffff812e498a <trailing_symlink+0x13a>: test %rax,%rax
> > > > 0xffffffff812e498d <trailing_symlink+0x13d>: je
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4999 <trailing_symlink+0x149>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e498f <trailing_symlink+0x13f>: mov (%rax),%eax
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4991 <trailing_symlink+0x141>: test %eax,%eax
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4993 <trailing_symlink+0x143>: je
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a6f <trailing_symlink+0x21f>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4999 <trailing_symlink+0x149>: mov
> > > > $0xffffffff82319b4f,%rdi
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49a0 <trailing_symlink+0x150>: mov
> > > > $0xfffffffffffffff3,%r12
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49a7 <trailing_symlink+0x157>: callq
> > > > 0xffffffff81161310 <audit_log_link_denied>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49ac <trailing_symlink+0x15c>: jmp
> > > > 0xffffffff812e493e <trailing_symlink+0xee>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49ae <trailing_symlink+0x15e>: mov
> > > > $0xffffffff8230164d,%r12
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49b5 <trailing_symlink+0x165>: jmp
> > > > 0xffffffff812e493e <trailing_symlink+0xee>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49b7 <trailing_symlink+0x167>: cmpq $0x0,0x20(%rbx)
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49bc <trailing_symlink+0x16c>: je
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a8a <trailing_symlink+0x23a>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49c2 <trailing_symlink+0x172>: mov %rbx,%rdi
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49c5 <trailing_symlink+0x175>: callq
> > > > 0xffffffff812e2da0 <nd_jump_root>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49ca <trailing_symlink+0x17a>: test %eax,%eax
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49cc <trailing_symlink+0x17c>: jne
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a97 <trailing_symlink+0x247>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49d2 <trailing_symlink+0x182>: add $0x1,%r12
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49d6 <trailing_symlink+0x186>: movzbl (%r12),%eax
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49db <trailing_symlink+0x18b>: cmp $0x2f,%al
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49dd <trailing_symlink+0x18d>: jne
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4935 <trailing_symlink+0xe5>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49e3 <trailing_symlink+0x193>: jmp
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49d2 <trailing_symlink+0x182>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49e5 <trailing_symlink+0x195>: mov
> > > > 0x20(%r13),%rax # inode->i_op
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49e9 <trailing_symlink+0x199>: add $0x10,%r15
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49ed <trailing_symlink+0x19d>: mov %r13,%rsi
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49f0 <trailing_symlink+0x1a0>: mov %r15,%rdx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49f3 <trailing_symlink+0x1a3>: mov
> > > > 0x8(%rax),%rcx # inode_operations->get_link
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49f7 <trailing_symlink+0x1a7>: testb $0x40,0x38(%rbx)
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49fb <trailing_symlink+0x1ab>: jne
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a1f <trailing_symlink+0x1cf>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49fd <trailing_symlink+0x1ad>: mov
> > > > %r14,%rdi # nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU == 0
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a00 <trailing_symlink+0x1b0>: callq
> > > > 0xffffffff81e00f70 <__x86_indirect_thunk_rcx> # jmpq *%rcx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a05 <trailing_symlink+0x1b5>: mov %rax,%r12
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a08 <trailing_symlink+0x1b8>: test %r12,%r12
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a0b <trailing_symlink+0x1bb>: je
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49ae <trailing_symlink+0x15e>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a0d <trailing_symlink+0x1bd>: cmp
> > > > $0xfffffffffffff000,%r12
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a14 <trailing_symlink+0x1c4>: jbe
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4928 <trailing_symlink+0xd8>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a1a <trailing_symlink+0x1ca>: jmpq
> > > > 0xffffffff812e493e <trailing_symlink+0xee>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a1f <trailing_symlink+0x1cf>: xor
> > > > %edi,%edi # nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU != 0
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a21 <trailing_symlink+0x1d1>: mov %rcx,-0x30(%rbp)
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a25 <trailing_symlink+0x1d5>: callq
> > > > 0xffffffff81e00f70 <__x86_indirect_thunk_rcx> # jmpq *%rcx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a2a <trailing_symlink+0x1da>: mov %rax,%r12
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a2d <trailing_symlink+0x1dd>: cmp
> > > > $0xfffffffffffffff6,%rax
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a31 <trailing_symlink+0x1e1>: jne
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a08 <trailing_symlink+0x1b8>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a33 <trailing_symlink+0x1e3>: mov %rbx,%rdi
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a36 <trailing_symlink+0x1e6>: callq
> > > > 0xffffffff812e3840 <unlazy_walk>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a3b <trailing_symlink+0x1eb>: test %eax,%eax
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a3d <trailing_symlink+0x1ed>: jne
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a97 <trailing_symlink+0x247>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a3f <trailing_symlink+0x1ef>: mov %r15,%rdx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a42 <trailing_symlink+0x1f2>: mov %r13,%rsi
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a45 <trailing_symlink+0x1f5>: mov %r14,%rdi
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a48 <trailing_symlink+0x1f8>: mov -0x30(%rbp),%rcx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a4c <trailing_symlink+0x1fc>: callq
> > > > 0xffffffff81e00f70 <__x86_indirect_thunk_rcx>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a51 <trailing_symlink+0x201>: mov %rax,%r12
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a54 <trailing_symlink+0x204>: jmp
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a08 <trailing_symlink+0x1b8>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a56 <trailing_symlink+0x206>: mov %rbx,%rdi
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a59 <trailing_symlink+0x209>: callq
> > > > 0xffffffff812e3840 <unlazy_walk>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a5e <trailing_symlink+0x20e>: test %eax,%eax
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a60 <trailing_symlink+0x210>: jne
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a97 <trailing_symlink+0x247>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a62 <trailing_symlink+0x212>: mov %r15,%rdi
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a65 <trailing_symlink+0x215>: callq
> > > > 0xffffffff812f8ae0 <touch_atime>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a6a <trailing_symlink+0x21a>: jmpq
> > > > 0xffffffff812e48f6 <trailing_symlink+0xa6>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a6f <trailing_symlink+0x21f>: mov 0x50(%rbx),%rax
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a73 <trailing_symlink+0x223>: mov 0xb8(%rbx),%rdi
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a7a <trailing_symlink+0x22a>: xor %edx,%edx
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a7c <trailing_symlink+0x22c>: mov 0x8(%rax),%rsi
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a80 <trailing_symlink+0x230>: callq
> > > > 0xffffffff811673f0 <__audit_inode>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a85 <trailing_symlink+0x235>: jmpq
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4999 <trailing_symlink+0x149>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a8a <trailing_symlink+0x23a>: mov %rbx,%rdi
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a8d <trailing_symlink+0x23d>: callq
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4790 <set_root>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a92 <trailing_symlink+0x242>: jmpq
> > > > 0xffffffff812e49c2 <trailing_symlink+0x172>
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a97 <trailing_symlink+0x247>: mov
> > > > $0xfffffffffffffff6,%r12
> > > > 0xffffffff812e4a9e <trailing_symlink+0x24e>: jmpq
> > > > 0xffffffff812e493e <trailing_symlink+0xee>
> > > >
> > > > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > According to my understanding, the problem solved by commit
> > > > 7b7820b83f23 ("xfs:
> > > > don't expose internal symlink metadata buffers to the vfs") is a
> > > > data NULL
> > > > pointer dereference, but the problem here is an instruction NULL
> > > > pointer
> > > > dereference.
> > > >
> > > > Further, I analyzed the possible triggering process as follows:
> > > >
> > > > rcu_walk do_unlinkat ~~> prune_dcache_sb create
> > > > rcu_read_lock
> > > > read_seqcount_retry
> > > > (the last check) iput_final
> > > > evict
> > > > destroy_inode
> > > > xfs_fs_destroy_inode
> > > > xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag xfs_ialloc
> > > > spin_lock(ip->i_flags_lock) xfs_dialloc
> > > > set(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE)
> > > > xfs_iget
> > > > wakeup(xfs_reclaim_worker) rcu_read_lock
> > > > spin_unlock(ip->i_flags_lock) xfs_iget_cache_hit
> > > > spin_lock(ip->i_flags_lock)
> > > >
> > > > if (XFS_IRECLAIMABLE && !XFS_IRECLAIM)
> > > > set(ip, XFS_IRECLAIM)
> > > > spin_unlock(ip->i_flags_lock)
> > > > rcu_read_unlock
> > > > < ------------ >
> > > >
> > > > // miss synchronize_rcu()
> > > > xfs_reinit_inode
> > > > ->get_link = NULL
> > > > get_link() // NULL
> > > >
> > > > rcu_read_unlock
> > > >
> > > > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Therefore, I think that after commit 7b7820b83f23 ("xfs: don't
> > > > expose internal
> > > > symlink metadata buffers to the vfs"), we should start
> > > > processing this NULL
> > > > ->get_link pointer dereference.
> > > >
> > > > Or, am I thinking wrong somewhere?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jinliang Zheng
> > > >
> > > > > > > Apart from that issue, I'm not aware of any other issues that the
> > > > > > > XFS inode recycling directly exposes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > According to my understanding, the essence of
> > > > > > > > this problem is that XFS reuses
> > > > > > > > the inode evicted by VFS, but VFS rcu-walk
> > > > > > > > assumes that this will not happen.
> > > > > > > It assumes that the inode will not change identity during the RCU
> > > > > > > grace period after the inode has been evicted from cache. We can
> > > > > > > safely reinstantiate an evicted inode without waiting for an RCU
> > > > > > > grace period as long as it is the same inode with the same content
> > > > > > > and same state.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Problems *may* arise when we unlink the inode, then evict it, then a
> > > > > > > new file is created and the old slab cache memory address is used
> > > > > > > for the new inode. I describe the issue here:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20220118232547.GD59729@dread.disaster.area/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > And judging from the relevant emails, the main reason
> > > > > > why ->get_link() is set
> > > > > > to NULL should be the lack of synchronize_rcu() before
> > > > > > xfs_reinit_inode() when
> > > > > > the inode is chosen to be reused.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > However, perhaps due to performance reasons, this
> > > > > > solution has not been merged
> > > > > > for a long time. How is it now?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe I am missing something in the threads of mail?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you very much. :)
> > > > > > Jinliang Zheng
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > That said, we have exactly zero evidence that this is actually a
> > > > > > > problem in production systems. We did get systems tripping over the
> > > > > > > symlink issue, but there's no evidence that the
> > > > > > > unlink->close->open(O_CREAT) issues are manifesting in the wild and
> > > > > > > hence there hasn't been any particular urgency to address it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Are there any recommended workarounds until an
> > > > > > > > elegant and efficient solution
> > > > > > > > can be proposed? After all, causing a crash is
> > > > > > > > extremely unacceptable in a
> > > > > > > > production environment.
> > > > > > > What crashes are you seeing in your production environment?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Dave.
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Dave Chinner
> > > > > > > david@fromorbit.com
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-20 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-05 11:38 About the conflict between XFS inode recycle and VFS rcu-walk alexjlzheng
2023-12-08 0:14 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-31 6:35 ` Jinliang Zheng
2024-01-31 19:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-15 15:54 ` alexjlzheng
2024-05-16 4:56 ` Jinliang Zheng
2024-05-16 7:08 ` Ian Kent
2024-05-16 7:23 ` Ian Kent
2024-05-20 17:36 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-05-21 1:35 ` Ian Kent
2024-05-21 2:13 ` Ian Kent
2024-05-26 15:04 ` Jinliang Zheng
2024-05-26 17:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-26 23:51 ` Ian Kent
2024-05-27 0:18 ` Al Viro
2024-05-28 15:51 ` Brian Foster
2024-05-27 9:41 ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-27 13:56 ` Jinliang Zheng
2024-05-28 2:10 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240520173638.GB25518@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=alexjlzheng@gmail.com \
--cc=alexjlzheng@tencent.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).