Linux-FSCrypt Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] generic/574: test multiple Merkle tree block sizes
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 15:47:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y64m/WNnlKYBAFVk@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221229163215.zpwgul6faq2rhpay@zlang-mailbox>

On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:32:15AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > 
> > This test passes for me both before and after this patch series.
> > 
> > Both before and after, the way this is supposed to work is that in:
> > 
> > 	bash -c "trap '' SIGBUS; command_that_exits_with_sigbus"
> > 
> > ... bash should print "Bus error" to stderr due to
> > 'command_that_exits_with_sigbus'.  That "Bus error" is then redirected.  Before
> > it was redirected to a pipeline; after it is redirected to a file.
> > 
> > I think what's happening is that the version of bash your system has is not
> > forking before exec'ing 'command_that_exits_with_sigbus'.  As a result, "Bus
> > error" is printed by the *parent* bash process instead, skipping any redirection
> > in the shell script.
> > 
> > Apparently skipping fork is a real thing in bash, and different versions of bash
> > have had subtly different conditions for enabling it.  So this seems plausible.
> > 
> > Adding an extra command after 'command_that_exits_with_sigbus' should fix this:
> > 
> > 	bash -c "trap '' SIGBUS; command_that_exits_with_sigbus; true"
> 
> Thanks for this explanation, I think you're right!
> 
> I'm not sure if it's a bug of bash. If it's not a bug, I think we can do this
> change (add a true) to avoid that failure. If it's a bug, hmmm..., I think we'd
> better to avoid that failure too, due to we don't test for bash :-/
> 
> How about your resend this single patch (by version 2.1), to fix this problem.
> Other patches looks good to me, I'd like to merge this patchset this weekend.
> 
> Thanks,
> Zorro

I expect that the bash developers wouldn't consider this to be a bug, since it
could only be fixed by removing the "skip fork" optimization entirely.

Anyway, the workaround I suggested is simple enough.

I just resent the whole series, since it's confusing to have new versions of
patches within existing series versions.  But only this one patch changed.

Thanks!

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-29 23:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-23  1:05 [PATCH v2 00/10] xfstests: update verity tests for non-4K block and page size Eric Biggers
2022-12-23  1:05 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] common/verity: add and use _fsv_can_enable() Eric Biggers
2022-12-23  1:05 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] common/verity: set FSV_BLOCK_SIZE to an appropriate value Eric Biggers
2022-12-23  1:05 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] common/verity: use FSV_BLOCK_SIZE by default Eric Biggers
2022-12-23  1:05 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] common/verity: add _filter_fsverity_digest() Eric Biggers
2022-12-23  1:05 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] generic/572: support non-4K Merkle tree block size Eric Biggers
2022-12-23  1:05 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] generic/573: " Eric Biggers
2022-12-23  1:05 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] generic/577: " Eric Biggers
2022-12-23  1:05 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] generic/574: test multiple Merkle tree block sizes Eric Biggers
2022-12-25 12:46   ` Zorro Lang
2022-12-26  5:21     ` Eric Biggers
2022-12-28 12:50       ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-12-29 16:32       ` Zorro Lang
2022-12-29 23:47         ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2022-12-23  1:05 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] generic/624: " Eric Biggers
2022-12-23  1:05 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] generic/575: test 1K Merkle tree block size Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y64m/WNnlKYBAFVk@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).