Linux-FSCrypt Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Cc: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@gmail.com>,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, paulcrowley@google.com,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] fscrypt: add per-extent encryption keys
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 20:53:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/aA2RIFbe++LBSs@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f17b268-6f6a-93dc-e6e0-ac0d982a72e0@dorminy.me>

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 09:13:47AM -0500, Sweet Tea Dorminy wrote:
> > 
> > I'm surprised that this submission generated no discussion across a
> > timeframe of over a month. Is this normal for RFC patch sets?
> 
> Eric pointed out some issues with patches 1 and 15 on 1/2. I've been on
> parental leave and have been busier with new little one than expected, and
> haven't sent out a new version yet. But I'm back to work in a week and this
> is my primary priority.

IMO, most of the patchset will change as a result of addressing my feedback.  So
I haven't had much motivation to review the current version in detail.  I'm
looking forward to the next version; I'm glad you're still working on it!

- Eric

      reply	other threads:[~2023-02-22 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-01  5:06 [RFC PATCH 00/17] fscrypt: add per-extent encryption keys Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-01  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 01/17] fscrypt: factor accessing inode->i_crypt_info Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-02 21:00   ` Eric Biggers
2023-01-01  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 02/17] fscrypt: separate getting info for a specific block Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-01  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 03/17] fscrypt: adjust effective lblks based on extents Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-01  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 04/17] fscrypt: factor out fscrypt_set_inode_info() Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-01  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 05/17] fscrypt: use parent dir's info for extent-based encryption Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-01  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 06/17] fscrypt: add a super_block pointer to fscrypt_info Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-01  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 07/17] fscrypt: update comments about inodes to include extents Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-01  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 08/17] fscrypt: rename mk->mk_decrypted_inodes* Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-01  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 09/17] fscrypt: make fscrypt_setup_encryption_info generic for extents Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-01  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 10/17] fscrypt: let fscrypt_infos be owned by an extent Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-01  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 11/17] fscrypt: update all the *per_file_* function names Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-01  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 12/17] fscrypt: notify per-extent infos if master key vanishes Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-01  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 13/17] fscrypt: use an optional ino equivalent for per-extent infos Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-01  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 14/17] fscrypt: add creation/usage/freeing of " Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-01  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 15/17] fscrypt: allow load/save of extent contexts Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-02 21:47   ` Eric Biggers
2023-01-02 22:31     ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-02 22:51       ` Eric Biggers
2023-01-03  0:33         ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-03  0:47           ` Eric Biggers
2023-01-03  1:23             ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-01  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 16/17] fscrypt: disable inline encryption for extent-based encryption Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-01-01  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 17/17] fscrypt: update documentation to mention per-extent keys Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-02-22 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH 00/17] fscrypt: add per-extent encryption keys Neal Gompa
2023-02-22 14:13   ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-02-22 20:53     ` Eric Biggers [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y/aA2RIFbe++LBSs@gmail.com \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ngompa13@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulcrowley@google.com \
    --cc=sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).