From: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 15:40:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <09e5e77b-5f37-9d93-51fd-1d9d39b219b2@dorminy.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZDRhQGYfOsJjzbjx@gmail.com>
On 4/10/23 15:19, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 06:16:21AM -0400, Sweet Tea Dorminy wrote:
>> Patchset should apply cleanly to fscrypt/for-next
>
> It doesn't apply. What is the base commit?
Apologies, I dropped the first patch. Resending.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-10 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-10 10:16 [PATCH v1 00/10] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 10:16 ` [PATCH v1 01/10] fscrypt: split and rename setup_file_encryption_key() Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 10:16 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] fscrypt: split and rename setup_per_mode_enc_key() Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 10:16 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] fscrypt: move dirhash key setup away from IO key setup Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 10:16 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] fscrypt: reduce special-casing of IV_INO_LBLK_32 Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 10:16 ` [PATCH v1 05/10] fscrypt: make infos have a pointer to prepared keys Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 10:16 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] fscrypt: move all the shared mode key setup deeper Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 10:16 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] fscrypt: make ci->ci_direct_key a bool not a pointer Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 10:16 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] fscrypt: make prepared keys record their type Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 10:16 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] fscrypt: explicitly track prepared parts of key Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 10:16 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] fscrypt: split key alloc and preparation Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 19:19 ` [PATCH v1 00/10] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:40 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=09e5e77b-5f37-9d93-51fd-1d9d39b219b2@dorminy.me \
--to=sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).