Linux-FPGA Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
To: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
	michal.simek@xilinx.com, git@xilinx.com,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>,
	Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	kishore Manne <nava.kishore.manne@amd.com>,
	"open list:FPGA MANAGER FRAMEWORK" <linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: fpga: Convert bridge binding to yaml
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 14:31:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c50564da-87c9-47dc-a546-779a6a82928b@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZZ0eVZGcYJ0sFxh2@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>



On 1/9/24 11:22, Xu Yilun wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 09:16:33AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 09/01/2024 09:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>>>>> +properties:
>>>>>>>>> +  $nodename:
>>>>>>>>> +    pattern: "^fpga-bridge(@.*)?$"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not sure, but maybe we need to allow fpga-bridge-1? Could we have more
>>>>>>>> than one bridge on given system?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yilun: Any comment on this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We can have more bridges, but IIUC people use fpga-bridge@0, fpga-bridge@0
>>>>>> to identify them. So the expression is OK to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you claim unit address thus reg with some sort of bus address is a
>>>>> requirement? Then "?" is not correct in that pattern.
>>>>
>>>> I expect it is about that people are using fpga-bridge@0 but bridge is not on
>>>> the bus. Yilun said that reg property in altr,socfpga-fpga2sdram-bridge.yaml is
>>>> optional which means no reg property no @XXX in node name.
>>>> That's why I think that expression is correct. If there are more bridges without
>>>> reg property then I expect we need to get more examples to align expression.
>>>
>>> If we allow node name without unit address, thus not being part of any
> 
> This is valid usecase.
> 
>>> bus, then the only question is whether it is possible to have system
>>> with more than two FPGA bridges. If the answer is "yes", which I think
> 
> The answer is yes.
> 
>>> is the case, then the pattern should already allow it:
>>>
>>> (@[0-9a-f]+|-[0-9]+)?
>>
>> Or better go with what I used recently for narrowed choices:
>>
>> (@.*|-([0-9]|[1-9][0-9]+))?
> 
> It is good to me.
> 
> I actually didn't know much about DTS & its Schema, thanks for all your
> input.

Ok. Will send v3 with it.

Thanks,
Michal

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-09 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-05 16:04 [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: fpga: Convert bridge binding to yaml Michal Simek
2024-01-05 16:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: fpga: altera: Convert bridge bindings " Michal Simek
2024-01-08  7:46   ` Xu Yilun
2024-01-08  8:12     ` Michal Simek
2024-01-09  4:04       ` Xu Yilun
2024-01-08  9:12   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-01-08  7:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: fpga: Convert bridge binding " Xu Yilun
2024-01-08  9:09 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-01-08  9:16   ` Michal Simek
2024-01-09  3:53     ` Xu Yilun
2024-01-09  8:00       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-01-09  8:06         ` Michal Simek
2024-01-09  8:15           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-01-09  8:16             ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-01-09 10:22               ` Xu Yilun
2024-01-09 13:31                 ` Michal Simek [this message]
2024-01-09  8:20             ` Michal Simek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c50564da-87c9-47dc-a546-779a6a82928b@amd.com \
    --to=michal.simek@amd.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=git@xilinx.com \
    --cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=nava.kishore.manne@amd.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).