Linux-BTRFS Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: simplify the inline extent map creation
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:50:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL3q7H7V2tzJP3udgEO2zQw=G_yu=M9mKNwO9y_-sybMQTqtOQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da18eebca4fdff1e0be286c18aee0359c074d3f8.1712038308.git.wqu@suse.com>

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 7:24 AM Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> wrote:
>
> With the tree-checker ensuring all inline file extents starts at file
> offset 0 and has a length no larger than sectorsize, we can simplify the
> calculation to assigned those fixes values directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> index e58fb5347e65..de3ccee38572 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> @@ -1265,18 +1265,19 @@ void btrfs_extent_item_to_extent_map(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
>         struct extent_buffer *leaf = path->nodes[0];
>         const int slot = path->slots[0];
>         struct btrfs_key key;
> -       u64 extent_start, extent_end;
> +       u64 extent_start;
>         u64 bytenr;
>         u8 type = btrfs_file_extent_type(leaf, fi);
>         int compress_type = btrfs_file_extent_compression(leaf, fi);
>
>         btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, slot);
>         extent_start = key.offset;
> -       extent_end = btrfs_file_extent_end(path);
>         em->ram_bytes = btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes(leaf, fi);
>         em->generation = btrfs_file_extent_generation(leaf, fi);
>         if (type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_REG ||
>             type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_PREALLOC) {
> +               u64 extent_end = btrfs_file_extent_end(path);
> +

This can be made const or better, since it's only used in one place
now and fits within 80 characters, just use the expression directly
instead of using a variable.

>                 em->start = extent_start;
>                 em->len = extent_end - extent_start;

Which is here:   em->len = btrfs_file_extent_end(path) - extent_start;

>                 em->orig_start = extent_start -
> @@ -1299,9 +1300,12 @@ void btrfs_extent_item_to_extent_map(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
>                                 em->flags |= EXTENT_FLAG_PREALLOC;
>                 }
>         } else if (type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
> +               /* Tree-checker has ensured this. */
> +               ASSERT(extent_start == 0);
> +
>                 em->block_start = EXTENT_MAP_INLINE;
> -               em->start = extent_start;
> -               em->len = extent_end - extent_start;
> +               em->start = 0;
> +               em->len = fs_info->sectorsize;
>                 /*
>                  * Initialize orig_start and block_len with the same values
>                  * as in inode.c:btrfs_get_extent().
> @@ -1336,7 +1340,7 @@ u64 btrfs_file_extent_end(const struct btrfs_path *path)
>
>         if (btrfs_file_extent_type(leaf, fi) == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
>                 end = btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes(leaf, fi);
> -               end = ALIGN(key.offset + end, leaf->fs_info->sectorsize);
> +               end = leaf->fs_info->sectorsize;

So both assignments to "end" should be removed, not just the second
one, as the new one doesn't need the previous and makes it pointless.

Thanks.

>         } else {
>                 end = key.offset + btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(leaf, fi);
>         }
> --
> 2.44.0
>
>

      reply	other threads:[~2024-04-02 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-02  6:23 [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: more explaination on extent_map members Qu Wenruo
2024-04-02  6:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: add extra comments " Qu Wenruo
2024-04-02  7:33   ` Andrea Gelmini
2024-04-02  8:25     ` Qu Wenruo
2024-04-02 15:45   ` Filipe Manana
2024-04-02  6:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: simplify the inline extent map creation Qu Wenruo
2024-04-02 15:50   ` Filipe Manana [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAL3q7H7V2tzJP3udgEO2zQw=G_yu=M9mKNwO9y_-sybMQTqtOQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).