From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com, josef@toxicpanda.com,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/5] btrfs: do not clear page dirty inside extent_write_locked_range()
Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 14:37:42 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2de38136837186e57f89bc1d9dc2a8761e3907aa.1716008374.git.wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1716008374.git.wqu@suse.com>
[BUG]
For subpage + zoned case, the following workload can lead to rsv data
leak at unmount time:
# mkfs.btrfs -f -s 4k $dev
# mount $dev $mnt
# fsstress -w -n 8 -d $mnt -s 1709539240
0/0: fiemap - no filename
0/1: copyrange read - no filename
0/2: write - no filename
0/3: rename - no source filename
0/4: creat f0 x:0 0 0
0/4: creat add id=0,parent=-1
0/5: writev f0[259 1 0 0 0 0] [778052,113,965] 0
0/6: ioctl(FIEMAP) f0[259 1 0 0 224 887097] [1294220,2291618343991484791,0x10000] -1
0/7: dwrite - xfsctl(XFS_IOC_DIOINFO) f0[259 1 0 0 224 887097] return 25, fallback to stat()
0/7: dwrite f0[259 1 0 0 224 887097] [696320,102400] 0
# umount $mnt
The dmesg would include the following rsv leak detection wanring (all
call trace skipped):
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 4528 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:8653 btrfs_destroy_inode+0x1e0/0x200 [btrfs]
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 4528 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:8654 btrfs_destroy_inode+0x1a8/0x200 [btrfs]
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 4528 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:8660 btrfs_destroy_inode+0x1a0/0x200 [btrfs]
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
BTRFS info (device sda): last unmount of filesystem 1b4abba9-de34-4f07-9e7f-157cf12a18d6
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4528 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4434 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x338/0x500 [btrfs]
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
BTRFS info (device sda): space_info DATA has 268218368 free, is not full
BTRFS info (device sda): space_info total=268435456, used=204800, pinned=0, reserved=0, may_use=12288, readonly=0 zone_unusable=0
BTRFS info (device sda): global_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
BTRFS info (device sda): trans_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
BTRFS info (device sda): chunk_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
BTRFS info (device sda): delayed_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
BTRFS info (device sda): delayed_refs_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4528 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4434 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x338/0x500 [btrfs]
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
BTRFS info (device sda): space_info METADATA has 267796480 free, is not full
BTRFS info (device sda): space_info total=268435456, used=131072, pinned=0, reserved=0, may_use=262144, readonly=0 zone_unusable=245760
BTRFS info (device sda): global_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
BTRFS info (device sda): trans_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
BTRFS info (device sda): chunk_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
BTRFS info (device sda): delayed_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
BTRFS info (device sda): delayed_refs_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
Above $dev is a tcmu-runner emulated zoned HDD, which has a max zone
append size of 64K, and the system has 64K page size.
[CAUSE]
I have added several trace_printk() to show the events (header skipped):
> btrfs_dirty_pages: r/i=5/259 dirty start=774144 len=114688
> btrfs_dirty_pages: r/i=5/259 dirty part of page=720896 off_in_page=53248 len_in_page=12288
> btrfs_dirty_pages: r/i=5/259 dirty part of page=786432 off_in_page=0 len_in_page=65536
> btrfs_dirty_pages: r/i=5/259 dirty part of page=851968 off_in_page=0 len_in_page=36864
The above lines shows our buffered write has dirtied 3 pages of inode
259 of root 5:
704K 768K 832K 896K
I |////I/////////////////I///////////| I
756K 868K
|///| is the dirtied range using subpage bitmaps. and 'I' is the page
boundary.
Meanwhile all three pages (704K, 768K, 832K) all have its PageDirty
flag set.
> btrfs_direct_write: r/i=5/259 start dio filepos=696320 len=102400
Then direct IO write starts, since the range [680K, 780K) covers the
beginning part of the above dirty range, btrfs needs to writeback the
two pages at 704K and 768K.
> cow_file_range: r/i=5/259 add ordered extent filepos=774144 len=65536
> extent_write_locked_range: r/i=5/259 locked page=720896 start=774144 len=65536
Now the above 2 lines shows that, we're writing back for dirty range
[756K, 756K + 64K).
We only writeback 64K because the zoned device has max zone append size
as 64K.
> extent_write_locked_range: r/i=5/259 clear dirty for page=786432
!!! The above line shows the root cause. !!!
We're calling clear_page_dirty_for_io() inside extent_write_locked_range(),
for the page 768K.
This is because extent_write_locked_range() can go beyond the current
locked page, here we hit the page at 768K and clear it's page dirt.
In fact this would lead to the desync between subpage dirty and page
dirty flags.
We have the page dirty flag cleared, but the subpage range [820K, 832K)
is still dirty.
After the writeback of range [756K, 820K), the dirty flags looks like
this, as page 768K no longer has dirty flag set.
704K 768K 832K 896K
I I | I/////////////| I
820K 868K
This means we will no longer writeback range [820K, 832K), thus the
reserved data/metadata space would never be properly released.
> extent_write_cache_pages: r/i=5/259 skip non-dirty folio=786432
Now even we try to start wrteiback for page 768K, since the
page is not dirty, we completely skip it at extent_write_cache_pages()
time.
> btrfs_direct_write: r/i=5/259 dio done filepos=696320 len=0
Now the direct IO finished.
> cow_file_range: r/i=5/259 add ordered extent filepos=851968 len=36864
> extent_write_locked_range: r/i=5/259 locked page=851968 start=851968 len=36864
Now we writeback the remaining dirty range, which is [832K, 868K).
Causing the range [820K, 832K) never be submitted, thus leaking the
reserved space.
This bug only affects subpage and zoned case.
For non-subpage and zoned case, we have exact one sector for each page,
thus no such partial dirty cases.
For subpage and non-zoned case, we never go into run_delalloc_cow(), and
normally all the dirty subpage ranges would be properly submitted inside
__extent_writepage_io().
[FIX]
Just do not clear the page dirty at all inside
extent_write_locked_range().
As __extent_writepage_io() would do a more accurate, subpage compatible
clear for page and subpage dirty flags anyway.
Now the correct trace would look like this:
> btrfs_dirty_pages: r/i=5/259 dirty start=774144 len=114688
> btrfs_dirty_pages: r/i=5/259 dirty part of page=720896 off_in_page=53248 len_in_page=12288
> btrfs_dirty_pages: r/i=5/259 dirty part of page=786432 off_in_page=0 len_in_page=65536
> btrfs_dirty_pages: r/i=5/259 dirty part of page=851968 off_in_page=0 len_in_page=36864
The page dirty part is still the same 3 pages.
> btrfs_direct_write: r/i=5/259 start dio filepos=696320 len=102400
> cow_file_range: r/i=5/259 add ordered extent filepos=774144 len=65536
> extent_write_locked_range: r/i=5/259 locked page=720896 start=774144 len=65536
And the writeback for the first 64K is still correct.
> cow_file_range: r/i=5/259 add ordered extent filepos=839680 len=49152
> extent_write_locked_range: r/i=5/259 locked page=786432 start=839680 len=49152
Now with the fix, we can properly writeback the range [820K, 832K), and
properly release the reserved data/metadata space.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index b6dc9308105d..08556db4b4de 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -2313,10 +2313,8 @@ void extent_write_locked_range(struct inode *inode, struct page *locked_page,
page = find_get_page(mapping, cur >> PAGE_SHIFT);
ASSERT(PageLocked(page));
- if (pages_dirty && page != locked_page) {
+ if (pages_dirty && page != locked_page)
ASSERT(PageDirty(page));
- clear_page_dirty_for_io(page);
- }
ret = __extent_writepage_io(BTRFS_I(inode), page, cur, cur_len,
&bio_ctrl, i_size, &nr);
--
2.45.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-18 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-18 5:07 [PATCH v5 0/5] btrfs: subpage + zoned fixes Qu Wenruo
2024-05-18 5:07 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] btrfs: make __extent_writepage_io() to write specified range only Qu Wenruo
2024-05-21 7:23 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-05-18 5:07 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] btrfs: subpage: introduce helpers to handle subpage delalloc locking Qu Wenruo
2024-05-21 7:50 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-05-21 7:57 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-05-18 5:07 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] btrfs: lock subpage ranges in one go for writepage_delalloc() Qu Wenruo
2024-05-21 8:11 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-05-21 8:45 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-05-21 11:54 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-05-21 22:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-05-22 1:10 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-05-18 5:07 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2024-05-18 5:07 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] btrfs: make extent_write_locked_range() to handle subpage writeback correctly Qu Wenruo
2024-05-21 7:13 ` Naohiro Aota
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2de38136837186e57f89bc1d9dc2a8761e3907aa.1716008374.git.wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).