Linux-bcachefs Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: kent.overstreet@linux.dev
Cc: bfoster@redhat.com, linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	 Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] bcachefs: Fix format specifier in validate_bset_keys()
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 08:16:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240416-bcachefs-fix-format-specifier-validate_bset_keys-v1-1-3ea2cdf28b12@kernel.org> (raw)

When building for 32-bit platforms, for which size_t is 'unsigned int',
there is a warning from a format string in validate_bset_keys():

  fs/bcachefs/btree_io.c: In function 'validate_bset_keys':
  fs/bcachefs/btree_io.c:891:34: error: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 12 has type 'unsigned int' [-Werror=format=]
    891 |                                  "bad k->u64s %u (min %u max %lu)", k->u64s,
        |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  fs/bcachefs/btree_io.c:603:32: note: in definition of macro 'btree_err'
    603 |                                msg, ##__VA_ARGS__);                     \
        |                                ^~~
  fs/bcachefs/btree_io.c:887:21: note: in expansion of macro 'btree_err_on'
    887 |                 if (btree_err_on(!bkeyp_u64s_valid(&b->format, k),
        |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~
  fs/bcachefs/btree_io.c:891:64: note: format string is defined here
    891 |                                  "bad k->u64s %u (min %u max %lu)", k->u64s,
        |                                                              ~~^
        |                                                                |
        |                                                                long unsigned int
        |                                                              %u
  cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

BKEY_U64s is size_t so the entire expression is promoted to size_t. Use
the '%zu' specifier so that there is no warning regardless of the width
of size_t.

Fixes: 031ad9e7dbd1 ("bcachefs: Check for packed bkeys that are too big")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404130747.wH6Dd23p-lkp@intel.com/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404131536.HdAMBOVc-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
---
 fs/bcachefs/btree_io.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/btree_io.c b/fs/bcachefs/btree_io.c
index 9678b2375bed..debb0edc3455 100644
--- a/fs/bcachefs/btree_io.c
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/btree_io.c
@@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ static int validate_bset_keys(struct bch_fs *c, struct btree *b,
 				 -BCH_ERR_btree_node_read_err_fixable,
 				 c, NULL, b, i,
 				 btree_node_bkey_bad_u64s,
-				 "bad k->u64s %u (min %u max %lu)", k->u64s,
+				 "bad k->u64s %u (min %u max %zu)", k->u64s,
 				 bkeyp_key_u64s(&b->format, k),
 				 U8_MAX - BKEY_U64s + bkeyp_key_u64s(&b->format, k)))
 			goto drop_this_key;

---
base-commit: 96fca68c4fbf77a8185eb10f7557e23352732ea2
change-id: 20240416-bcachefs-fix-format-specifier-validate_bset_keys-693c1daad9c9

Best regards,
-- 
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>


             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-16 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-16 15:16 Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2024-04-16 22:09 ` [PATCH] bcachefs: Fix format specifier in validate_bset_keys() Kent Overstreet
2024-04-22 12:47   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-04-22 19:32     ` Kent Overstreet
2024-04-23 10:24       ` bcachefs broken in next (was: Re: [PATCH] bcachefs: Fix format specifier in validate_bset_keys()) Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240416-bcachefs-fix-format-specifier-validate_bset_keys-v1-1-3ea2cdf28b12@kernel.org \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).