From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v37 00/33] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:58:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aff6b556-7cc9-be2d-e1d2-ddfaae665210@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92d0f7cb-f565-38ad-37e8-54e04189f558@canonical.com>
On 7/12/2022 2:42 PM, John Johansen wrote:
> On 6/27/22 17:55, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> This patchset provides the changes required for
>> the AppArmor security module to stack safely with any other.
>> There are additional changes required for SELinux and Smack
>> to coexist. These are primarily in the networking code and
>> will be addressed after these changes are upstream.
>>
>> v37: Rebase to 5.19-rc3
>> - Audit changes should be complete, all comments have been
>> addressed.
>> - Address indexing an empty array for the case where no
>> built in security modules require data in struct lsmblob.
>> - Fix a few checkpatch complaints.
>> v36: Rebase to 5.19-rc1
>> - Yet another rework of the audit changes. Rearranging how the
>> timestamp is managed allows auxiliary records to be generated
>> correctly with a minimum of fuss.
>> - In the end no LSM interface scaffolding remains. Secids have
>> been replaced with lsmblob structures in all cases, including
>> IMA and NetLabel.
>
> <<snip>>
>
>> https://github.com/cschaufler/lsm-stacking.git#stack-5.19-rc3-v37
>>
>
> hey Casey,
>
> I am not finding v37 in your public github tree, the newest I see is v36
> and v36-a both based on 5.19-rc1. Can you make sure v37 is pushed?
Whoops. v37 hadn't gotten pushed. It has been now. Thanks for
your interest! And subsequent reviews, of course.
>
> thanks
> john
>
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-12 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220628005611.13106-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 00/33] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 01/33] integrity: disassociate ima_filter_rule from security_audit_rule Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 02/33] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 03/33] LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 04/33] LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 05/33] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 06/33] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 07/33] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 08/33] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 09/33] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 10/33] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 11/33] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_current_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 12/33] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 13/33] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 14/33] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 15/33] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 16/33] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 17/33] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 18/33] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_dentry_init_security Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 5:36 ` kernel test robot
2022-06-28 8:44 ` kernel test robot
2022-06-28 11:24 ` kernel test robot
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 19/33] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 20/33] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:55 ` [PATCH v37 21/33] binder: Pass LSM identifier for confirmation Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:56 ` [PATCH v37 22/33] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx module selection Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:56 ` [PATCH v37 23/33] Audit: Keep multiple LSM data in audit_names Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:56 ` [PATCH v37 24/33] Audit: Create audit_stamp structure Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:56 ` [PATCH v37 25/33] LSM: Add a function to report multiple LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:56 ` [PATCH v37 26/33] Audit: Allow multiple records in an audit_buffer Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:56 ` [PATCH v37 27/33] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:56 ` [PATCH v37 28/33] audit: multiple subject lsm values for netlabel Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:56 ` [PATCH v37 29/33] Audit: Add record for multiple object contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:56 ` [PATCH v37 30/33] netlabel: Use a struct lsmblob in audit data Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:56 ` [PATCH v37 31/33] LSM: Removed scaffolding function lsmcontext_init Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:56 ` [PATCH v37 32/33] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2022-06-28 0:56 ` [PATCH v37 33/33] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2022-07-12 21:42 ` [PATCH v37 00/33] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor John Johansen
2022-07-12 21:58 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aff6b556-7cc9-be2d-e1d2-ddfaae665210@schaufler-ca.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).