Re: No more report of quantity of rules successfully loaded

From: "warron.french" <warron.french@gmail.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: No more report of quantity of rules successfully loaded
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 20:41:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJdJdQk4-CL7fj3US+LkAR1_p9OJmbfUwYM687gkjF5c3RZV1g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZG5tKxgzVJLxSZm9@madcap2.tricolour.ca>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3036 bytes --]

Obviously both of you are correct.  I am thinking about the number of rules
that load when not all of the rules load.  Specifically, it gives a line
number of the last line that loaded from the rules.  Which, for
troubleshooting purposes, I always put into a single file and sort
"alphabetically."

Also, I solved my own problem on the ruleset in the single file I was
working with on my VM.  I had 220 lines of syntax, and many of the lines
were auditd controls, because I do not know the exact term to label them;
things like -D -b -e -f and so on.

Thank you both, sorry for the disruption.
--------------------------
Warron French

On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 4:01 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 2023-05-24 10:42, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > Hello Warron,
> >
> > On Tuesday, May 23, 2023 7:12:07 PM EDT warron.french wrote:
> > > Hi, I am running auditd-3.0.7-4 on an Alma Linux v8.8.
> > >
> > > I know that for all of RHEL 6 and RHEL 7 variants that I worked with,
> to
> > > include CentOS (not Stream) that after I rebooted a server or
> restarted the
> > > auditd service (with -e 1 set) that I would 100% of the time get a
> report
> > > in /var/log/messages about the quantity of rules that successfully
> loaded.
> >
> > It has never done that unless someone else has a patch they did not send
> > upstream.
> >
> > > I could compare that to my unified rules file
> > > (/etc/audit/rules.d/Unified.rules - for a reference) and strip out the
> > > typical for auditd Control rules (-D, -e 1, -f 1, -b, -r, for
> examples) and
> > > then assess if I had the full set of files loaded or not.
> > >
> > > With this implementation of auditd, on version 3.0.7-4, I am not
> getting
> > > those results anymore.
> > > Am I looking in the wrong place, because for me this is important
> > > information?
> >
> > It has never done that. auditctl -D gives the output of auditctl -s as a
> > convenience. But auditctl -s has never reported how many rules are
> loaded. I
> > don't think the kernel has a counter. It has a variable for if any rules
> are
> > loaded, but not the quantity.
>
> Minor correction: there is a kernel variable (audit_n_rules) that counts
> the number of syscall rules in place, but it isn't reported directly
> outside the kernel.  This feeds the boolean (struct
> audit_context)->dummy.
>
> > > Yes, I know that I can also manually execute "auditctl -l  | wc -l"
> and get
> > > that information  too, but I was wondering if this is planned or if I
> am
> > > looking in the wrong place, or what to do.
> >
> > It has never done that and is not planned.
> >
> > -Steve
>
> - RGB
>
> --
> Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
> Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
> Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
> IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
> Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635
> --
> Linux-audit mailing list
> Linux-audit@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
>
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4090 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 107 bytes --]

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit