From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Rafael Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 32/32] cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that can be brought online
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 13:50:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230203135043.409192-33-james.morse@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230203135043.409192-1-james.morse@arm.com>
The 'offline' file in sysfs shows all offline CPUs, including those
that aren't present. User-space is expected to remove not-present CPUs
from thie list to learn which CPUs could be brought online.
CPUs can be present but not-enabled. These CPUs can't be brought online
until the firmware policy changes, which comes with an ACPI notification
that will register the CPUs.
With only the offline and present files, user-space is unable to
determine which CPUs it can try to bring online. Add a new CPU mask
that shows this based on all the registered CPUs.
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
drivers/base/cpu.c | 10 ++++++++++
include/linux/cpumask.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/cpu.c | 3 +++
3 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
index bc2ce8c7f383..3cc06f9fd230 100644
--- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ void unregister_cpu(struct cpu *cpu)
{
int logical_cpu = cpu->dev.id;
+ set_cpu_enabled(logical_cpu, false);
unregister_cpu_under_node(logical_cpu, cpu_to_node(logical_cpu));
device_unregister(&cpu->dev);
@@ -265,6 +266,13 @@ static ssize_t print_cpus_offline(struct device *dev,
}
static DEVICE_ATTR(offline, 0444, print_cpus_offline, NULL);
+static ssize_t print_cpus_enabled(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%*pbl\n", cpumask_pr_args(cpu_enabled_mask));
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR(enabled, 0444, print_cpus_enabled, NULL);
+
static ssize_t print_cpus_isolated(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
@@ -384,6 +392,7 @@ int register_cpu(struct cpu *cpu, int num)
register_cpu_under_node(num, cpu_to_node(num));
dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit(&cpu->dev,
PM_QOS_RESUME_LATENCY_NO_CONSTRAINT);
+ set_cpu_enabled(num, true);
return 0;
}
@@ -465,6 +474,7 @@ static struct attribute *cpu_root_attrs[] = {
&cpu_attrs[2].attr.attr,
&dev_attr_kernel_max.attr,
&dev_attr_offline.attr,
+ &dev_attr_enabled.attr,
&dev_attr_isolated.attr,
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
&dev_attr_nohz_full.attr,
diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index c2aa0aa26b45..1513bb00dee4 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static inline void set_nr_cpu_ids(unsigned int nr)
*
* cpu_possible_mask- has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu is populatable
* cpu_present_mask - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu is populated
+ * cpu_enabled_mask - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu can be brought online
* cpu_online_mask - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu available to scheduler
* cpu_active_mask - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu available to migration
*
@@ -91,11 +92,13 @@ static inline void set_nr_cpu_ids(unsigned int nr)
extern struct cpumask __cpu_possible_mask;
extern struct cpumask __cpu_online_mask;
+extern struct cpumask __cpu_enabled_mask;
extern struct cpumask __cpu_present_mask;
extern struct cpumask __cpu_active_mask;
extern struct cpumask __cpu_dying_mask;
#define cpu_possible_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask)
#define cpu_online_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_online_mask)
+#define cpu_enabled_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_enabled_mask)
#define cpu_present_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_present_mask)
#define cpu_active_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_active_mask)
#define cpu_dying_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_dying_mask)
@@ -921,6 +924,7 @@ extern const DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_all_bits, NR_CPUS);
#else
#define for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask)
#define for_each_online_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_online_mask)
+#define for_each_enabled_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_enabled_mask)
#define for_each_present_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_present_mask)
#endif
@@ -943,6 +947,15 @@ set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible)
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_possible_mask);
}
+static inline void
+set_cpu_enabled(unsigned int cpu, bool can_be_onlined)
+{
+ if (can_be_onlined)
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_enabled_mask);
+ else
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_enabled_mask);
+}
+
static inline void
set_cpu_present(unsigned int cpu, bool present)
{
@@ -1022,6 +1035,7 @@ static inline unsigned int num_online_cpus(void)
return atomic_read(&__num_online_cpus);
}
#define num_possible_cpus() cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask)
+#define num_enabled_cpus() cpumask_weight(cpu_enabled_mask)
#define num_present_cpus() cpumask_weight(cpu_present_mask)
#define num_active_cpus() cpumask_weight(cpu_active_mask)
@@ -1030,6 +1044,11 @@ static inline bool cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask);
}
+static inline bool cpu_enabled(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_enabled_mask);
+}
+
static inline bool cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu)
{
return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_possible_mask);
@@ -1054,6 +1073,7 @@ static inline bool cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
#define num_online_cpus() 1U
#define num_possible_cpus() 1U
+#define num_enabled_cpus() 1U
#define num_present_cpus() 1U
#define num_active_cpus() 1U
@@ -1067,6 +1087,11 @@ static inline bool cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu)
return cpu == 0;
}
+static inline bool cpu_enabled(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ return cpu == 0;
+}
+
static inline bool cpu_present(unsigned int cpu)
{
return cpu == 0;
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 6c0a92ca6bb5..6f4febf0142e 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -2639,6 +2639,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_possible_mask);
struct cpumask __cpu_online_mask __read_mostly;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_online_mask);
+struct cpumask __cpu_enabled_mask __read_mostly;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_enabled_mask);
+
struct cpumask __cpu_present_mask __read_mostly;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_present_mask);
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-03 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-03 13:50 [RFC PATCH 00/32] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpuhotplug James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 01/32] ia64: Fix build error due to switch case label appearing next to declaration James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 02/32] ACPI: Move ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU to be enabled per architecture James Morse
2023-08-30 18:31 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 03/32] drivers: base: Use present CPUs in GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 04/32] drivers: base: Allow parts of GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES to be overridden James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 05/32] drivers: base: Move cpu_dev_init() after node_dev_init() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 06/32] arm64: setup: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES using arch_register_cpu() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 07/32] ia64/topology: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 08/32] x86/topology: " James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 09/32] LoongArch: " James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 10/32] arch_topology: Make register_cpu_capacity_sysctl() tolerant to late CPUs James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 11/32] ACPI: processor: Add support for processors described as container packages James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 12/32] ACPI: processor: Register CPUs that are online, but not described in the DSDT James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 13/32] ACPI: processor: Register all CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 14/32] ACPI: Rename ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU to include 'present' James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 15/32] ACPI: Move acpi_bus_trim_one() before acpi_scan_hot_remove() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 16/32] ACPI: Rename acpi_processor_hotadd_init and remove pre-processor guards James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 17/32] ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 18/32] ACPI: Check _STA present bit before making CPUs not present James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 19/32] ACPI: Warn when the present bit changes but the feature is not enabled James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 20/32] drivers: base: Implement weak arch_unregister_cpu() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 21/32] LoongArch: Use the __weak version of arch_unregister_cpu() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 22/32] arm64: acpi: Move get_cpu_for_acpi_id() to a header James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 23/32] ACPICA: Add new MADT GICC flags fields [code first?] James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 24/32] arm64, irqchip/gic-v3, ACPI: Move MADT GICC enabled check into a helper James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 25/32] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 26/32] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable' CPUs James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 27/32] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 28/32] ACPI: add support to register CPUs based on the _STA enabled bit James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 29/32] KVM: arm64: Pass hypercalls to userspace James Morse
2023-02-03 21:08 ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-07 17:50 ` James Morse
2023-02-08 9:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-05 10:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-06 10:10 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-02-06 12:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-07 9:41 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-02-07 11:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-07 12:46 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-02-06 17:19 ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-07 17:50 ` James Morse
2023-02-08 8:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-08 14:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-11 1:44 ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 30/32] KVM: arm64: Pass PSCI calls " James Morse
2023-05-23 9:32 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-12 17:01 ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 31/32] arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` James Morse [this message]
2023-03-07 12:00 ` [RFC PATCH 00/32] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpuhotplug Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-13 15:50 ` James Morse
2023-03-14 11:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-29 2:35 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-12 17:01 ` James Morse
2023-09-12 22:38 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-13 15:28 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-03-29 5:52 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-03 6:25 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230203135043.409192-33-james.morse@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).