KVM Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  jiang.yong5@zte.com.cn,
	wang.liang82@zte.com.cn, jiang.xuexin@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: introduce vm's max_halt_poll_ns to debugfs
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 07:59:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zjzkzu3gVUQt8gJG@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202405091030597804KUqLDPPj2FpTIBrZZ5Eo@zte.com.cn>

On Thu, May 09, 2024, cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn wrote:
> > From: seanjc <seanjc@google.com>
> > > From: Cheng Lin <cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn>
> > >
> > > Introduce vm's max_halt_poll_ns and override_halt_poll_ns to
> > > debugfs. Provide a way to check and modify them.
> > Why?
> If a vm's max_halt_poll_ns has been set using KVM_CAP_HALT_POLL,
> the module parameter kvm.halt_poll.ns will no longer indicate the maximum
> halt pooling interval for that vm. After introducing these two attributes into
> debugfs, it can be used to check whether the individual configuration of the
> vm is enabled and the working value.

But why is max_halt_poll_ns special enough to warrant debugfs entries?  There is
a _lot_ of state in KVM that is configurable per-VM, it simply isn't feasible to
dump everything into debugfs.

I do think it would be reasonable to capture the max allowed polling time in
the existing tracepoint though, e.g.

diff --git a/include/trace/events/kvm.h b/include/trace/events/kvm.h
index 74e40d5d4af4..7e66e9b2e497 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/kvm.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/kvm.h
@@ -41,24 +41,26 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_userspace_exit,
 );
 
 TRACE_EVENT(kvm_vcpu_wakeup,
-           TP_PROTO(__u64 ns, bool waited, bool valid),
-           TP_ARGS(ns, waited, valid),
+           TP_PROTO(__u64 ns, __u32 max_ns, bool waited, bool valid),
+           TP_ARGS(ns, max_ns, waited, valid),
 
        TP_STRUCT__entry(
                __field(        __u64,          ns              )
+               __field(        __u32,          max_ns          )
                __field(        bool,           waited          )
                __field(        bool,           valid           )
        ),
 
        TP_fast_assign(
                __entry->ns             = ns;
+               __entry->max_ns         = max_ns;
                __entry->waited         = waited;
                __entry->valid          = valid;
        ),
 
-       TP_printk("%s time %lld ns, polling %s",
+       TP_printk("%s time %llu ns (max poll %u ns), polling %s",
                  __entry->waited ? "wait" : "poll",
-                 __entry->ns,
+                 __entry->ns, __entry->max_ns,
                  __entry->valid ? "valid" : "invalid")
 );
 
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 2e388972d856..f093138f3cd7 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -3846,7 +3846,8 @@ void kvm_vcpu_halt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
                }
        }
 
-       trace_kvm_vcpu_wakeup(halt_ns, waited, vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu));
+       trace_kvm_vcpu_wakeup(halt_ns, max_halt_poll_ns, waited,
+                             vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu));
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_halt);

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-09 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-08 10:47 [PATCH] KVM: introduce vm's max_halt_poll_ns to debugfs cheng.lin130
2024-05-08 15:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-09  2:30   ` cheng.lin130
2024-05-09 14:59     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-05-10  3:18       ` cheng.lin130
2024-05-10 14:07         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-11  2:34           ` cheng.lin130
2024-05-14 22:00             ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-15  4:03               ` cheng.lin130

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zjzkzu3gVUQt8gJG@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=jiang.xuexin@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=jiang.yong5@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=wang.liang82@zte.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).