KVM Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: maobibo <maobibo@loongson.cn>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@loongson.cn>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/6] LoongArch: KVM: Add vcpu search support from physical cpuid
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 14:36:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7335dcde-1b3a-1260-ac62-d2d9fcbd6a78@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAhV-H6kBO_RTTHoLfKdAtLO1Aqb0KmAJ6wn0wZrvbCkzMszDQ@mail.gmail.com>



On 2024/5/6 上午9:49, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Hi, Bibo,
> 
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 6:05 PM Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn> wrote:
>>
>> Physical cpuid is used for interrupt routing for irqchips such as
>> ipi/msi/extioi interrupt controller. And physical cpuid is stored
>> at CSR register LOONGARCH_CSR_CPUID, it can not be changed once vcpu
>> is created and physical cpuid of two vcpus cannot be the same.
>>
>> Different irqchips have different size declaration about physical cpuid,
>> max cpuid value for CSR LOONGARCH_CSR_CPUID on 3A5000 is 512, max cpuid
>> supported by IPI hardware is 1024, 256 for extioi irqchip, and 65536
>> for MSI irqchip.
>>
>> The smallest value from all interrupt controllers is selected now,
>> and the max cpuid size is defines as 256 by KVM which comes from
>> extioi irqchip.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>
>> ---
>>   arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 26 ++++++++
>>   arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_vcpu.h |  1 +
>>   arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c             | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c               | 11 ++++
>>   4 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 2d62f7b0d377..3ba16ef1fe69 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -64,6 +64,30 @@ struct kvm_world_switch {
>>
>>   #define MAX_PGTABLE_LEVELS     4
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Physical cpu id is used for interrupt routing, there are different
>> + * definitions about physical cpuid on different hardwares.
>> + *  For LOONGARCH_CSR_CPUID register, max cpuid size if 512
>> + *  For IPI HW, max dest CPUID size 1024
>> + *  For extioi interrupt controller, max dest CPUID size is 256
>> + *  For MSI interrupt controller, max supported CPUID size is 65536
>> + *
>> + * Currently max CPUID is defined as 256 for KVM hypervisor, in future
>> + * it will be expanded to 4096, including 16 packages at most. And every
>> + * package supports at most 256 vcpus
>> + */
>> +#define KVM_MAX_PHYID          256
>> +
>> +struct kvm_phyid_info {
>> +       struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> +       bool            enabled;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct kvm_phyid_map {
>> +       int max_phyid;
>> +       struct kvm_phyid_info phys_map[KVM_MAX_PHYID];
>> +};
>> +
>>   struct kvm_arch {
>>          /* Guest physical mm */
>>          kvm_pte_t *pgd;
>> @@ -71,6 +95,8 @@ struct kvm_arch {
>>          unsigned long invalid_ptes[MAX_PGTABLE_LEVELS];
>>          unsigned int  pte_shifts[MAX_PGTABLE_LEVELS];
>>          unsigned int  root_level;
>> +       spinlock_t    phyid_map_lock;
>> +       struct kvm_phyid_map  *phyid_map;
>>
>>          s64 time_offset;
>>          struct kvm_context __percpu *vmcs;
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_vcpu.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_vcpu.h
>> index 0cb4fdb8a9b5..9f53950959da 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_vcpu.h
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_vcpu.h
>> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ void kvm_save_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>   void kvm_restore_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>
>>   int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_interrupt *irq);
>> +struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_get_vcpu_by_cpuid(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid);
>>
>>   /*
>>    * Loongarch KVM guest interrupt handling
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c
>> index 3a8779065f73..b633fd28b8db 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c
>> @@ -274,6 +274,95 @@ static int _kvm_getcsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int id, u64 *val)
>>          return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> +static inline int kvm_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
>> +{
>> +       int cpuid;
>> +       struct loongarch_csrs *csr = vcpu->arch.csr;
>> +       struct kvm_phyid_map  *map;
>> +
>> +       if (val >= KVM_MAX_PHYID)
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +       cpuid = kvm_read_sw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_ESTAT);
>> +       map = vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map;
>> +       spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
>> +       if (map->phys_map[cpuid].enabled) {
>> +               /*
>> +                * Cpuid is already set before
>> +                * Forbid changing different cpuid at runtime
>> +                */
>> +               if (cpuid != val) {
>> +                       /*
>> +                        * Cpuid 0 is initial value for vcpu, maybe invalid
>> +                        * unset value for vcpu
>> +                        */
>> +                       if (cpuid) {
>> +                               spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
>> +                               return -EINVAL;
>> +                       }
>> +               } else {
>> +                        /* Discard duplicated cpuid set */
>> +                       spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
>> +                       return 0;
>> +               }
>> +       }
> I have changed the logic and comments when I apply, you can double
> check whether it is correct.
I checkout the latest version, the modification in function 
kvm_set_cpuid() is good for me.
> 
>> +
>> +       if (map->phys_map[val].enabled) {
>> +               /*
>> +                * New cpuid is already set with other vcpu
>> +                * Forbid sharing the same cpuid between different vcpus
>> +                */
>> +               if (map->phys_map[val].vcpu != vcpu) {
>> +                       spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
>> +                       return -EINVAL;
>> +               }
>> +
>> +               /* Discard duplicated cpuid set operation*/
>> +               spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
>> +               return 0;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       kvm_write_sw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_CPUID, val);
>> +       map->phys_map[val].enabled      = true;
>> +       map->phys_map[val].vcpu         = vcpu;
>> +       if (map->max_phyid < val)
>> +               map->max_phyid = val;
>> +       spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_get_vcpu_by_cpuid(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid)
>> +{
>> +       struct kvm_phyid_map  *map;
>> +
>> +       if (cpuid >= KVM_MAX_PHYID)
>> +               return NULL;
>> +
>> +       map = kvm->arch.phyid_map;
>> +       if (map->phys_map[cpuid].enabled)
>> +               return map->phys_map[cpuid].vcpu;
>> +
>> +       return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void kvm_drop_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> +       int cpuid;
>> +       struct loongarch_csrs *csr = vcpu->arch.csr;
>> +       struct kvm_phyid_map  *map;
>> +
>> +       map = vcpu->kvm->arch.phyid_map;
>> +       cpuid = kvm_read_sw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_ESTAT);
>> +       if (cpuid >= KVM_MAX_PHYID)
>> +               return;
>> +
>> +       if (map->phys_map[cpuid].enabled) {
>> +               map->phys_map[cpuid].vcpu = NULL;
>> +               map->phys_map[cpuid].enabled = false;
>> +               kvm_write_sw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_CPUID, 0);
>> +       }
>> +}
> While kvm_set_cpuid() is protected by a spinlock, do kvm_drop_cpuid()
> and kvm_get_vcpu_by_cpuid() also need it?
> 
It is good to me that spinlock is added in function kvm_drop_cpuid().
And thinks for the efforts.

Regards
Bibo Mao
>> +
>>   static int _kvm_setcsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int id, u64 val)
>>   {
>>          int ret = 0, gintc;
>> @@ -291,7 +380,8 @@ static int _kvm_setcsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int id, u64 val)
>>                  kvm_set_sw_gcsr(csr, LOONGARCH_CSR_ESTAT, gintc);
>>
>>                  return ret;
>> -       }
>> +       } else if (id == LOONGARCH_CSR_CPUID)
>> +               return kvm_set_cpuid(vcpu, val);
>>
>>          kvm_write_sw_gcsr(csr, id, val);
>>
>> @@ -943,6 +1033,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>          hrtimer_cancel(&vcpu->arch.swtimer);
>>          kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache);
>>          kfree(vcpu->arch.csr);
>> +       kvm_drop_cpuid(vcpu);
> I think this line should be before the above kfree(), otherwise you
> get a "use after free".
> 
> Huacai
> 
>>
>>          /*
>>           * If the vCPU is freed and reused as another vCPU, we don't want the
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c
>> index 0a37f6fa8f2d..6006a28653ad 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vm.c
>> @@ -30,6 +30,14 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>>          if (!kvm->arch.pgd)
>>                  return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> +       kvm->arch.phyid_map = kvzalloc(sizeof(struct kvm_phyid_map),
>> +                               GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
>> +       if (!kvm->arch.phyid_map) {
>> +               free_page((unsigned long)kvm->arch.pgd);
>> +               kvm->arch.pgd = NULL;
>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>> +       }
>> +
>>          kvm_init_vmcs(kvm);
>>          kvm->arch.gpa_size = BIT(cpu_vabits - 1);
>>          kvm->arch.root_level = CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS - 1;
>> @@ -44,6 +52,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>>          for (i = 0; i <= kvm->arch.root_level; i++)
>>                  kvm->arch.pte_shifts[i] = PAGE_SHIFT + i * (PAGE_SHIFT - 3);
>>
>> +       spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.phyid_map_lock);
>>          return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -51,7 +60,9 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>>   {
>>          kvm_destroy_vcpus(kvm);
>>          free_page((unsigned long)kvm->arch.pgd);
>> +       kvfree(kvm->arch.phyid_map);
>>          kvm->arch.pgd = NULL;
>> +       kvm->arch.phyid_map = NULL;
>>   }
>>
>>   int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
>> --
>> 2.39.3
>>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-06  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-28 10:05 [PATCH v8 0/6] LoongArch: Add pv ipi support on LoongArch VM Bibo Mao
2024-04-28 10:05 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] LoongArch/smp: Refine some ipi functions on LoongArch platform Bibo Mao
2024-04-28 10:05 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] LoongArch: KVM: Add hypercall instruction emulation support Bibo Mao
2024-05-06  1:54   ` Huacai Chen
2024-05-06  2:41     ` maobibo
2024-04-28 10:05 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] LoongArch: KVM: Add cpucfg area for kvm hypervisor Bibo Mao
2024-04-28 16:38   ` kernel test robot
2024-04-28 10:05 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] LoongArch: KVM: Add vcpu search support from physical cpuid Bibo Mao
2024-05-06  1:49   ` Huacai Chen
2024-05-06  2:29     ` maobibo
2024-05-06  6:36     ` maobibo [this message]
2024-05-06  7:06       ` Huacai Chen
2024-05-06  8:18         ` maobibo
2024-05-06  8:59           ` Huacai Chen
2024-05-06  9:35             ` maobibo
2024-05-06  9:40               ` Huacai Chen
2024-05-06 10:05                 ` maobibo
2024-05-06 14:17                   ` Huacai Chen
2024-05-07  1:40                     ` maobibo
2024-05-07  2:05                       ` Huacai Chen
2024-05-07  3:06                         ` maobibo
2024-05-08  5:00                           ` Huacai Chen
2024-05-08  6:10                             ` maobibo
2024-04-28 10:05 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] LoongArch: KVM: Add pv ipi support on kvm side Bibo Mao
2024-04-28 10:05 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] LoongArch: Add pv ipi support on guest kernel side Bibo Mao
2024-05-06  1:53   ` Huacai Chen
2024-05-06  7:00     ` maobibo
2024-05-06  7:04       ` Huacai Chen
2024-05-06  1:45 ` [PATCH v8 0/6] LoongArch: Add pv ipi support on LoongArch VM Huacai Chen
2024-05-06  6:32   ` maobibo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7335dcde-1b3a-1260-ac62-d2d9fcbd6a78@loongson.cn \
    --to=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=zhaotianrui@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).