KVM Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: "seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@intel.com>,
	"luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Liu, Zhao1" <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Kang, Shan" <shan.kang@intel.com>, "bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 8/9] KVM: VMX: Open code VMX preemption timer rate mask in its accessor
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:44:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26afec9c667327191850b17c511901623e91976e.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zipru9eB9oDOOuxf@google.com>

On Thu, 2024-04-25 at 07:42 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024, Kai Huang wrote:
> > On Wed, 2024-04-24 at 13:06 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > > static inline u32 vmx_basic_vmcs_mem_type(u64 vmx_basic)
> > > > > {
> > > > > 	return (vmx_basic & GENMASK_ULL(53, 50)) >>
> > > > > 		VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_SHIFT;
> > > > > }
> > > > > 
> > > > > looks not intuitive than original patch.
> > > > 
> > > > Yeah, agreed, that's taking the worst of both worlds.  I'll update patch 5 to drop
> > > > VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_SHIFT when effectively "moving" it into vmx_basic_vmcs_mem_type().
> > > 
> > > Drat.  Finally getting back to this, dropping VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_SHIFT doesn't
> > > work because it's used by nested_vmx_setup_basic(), as is VMX_BASIC_VMCS_SIZE_SHIFT,
> > > which is presumably why past me kept them around.
> > > 
> > > I'm leaning towards keeping things as proposed in this series.  I don't see us
> > > gaining a third copy, or even a third user, i.e. I don't think we are creating a
> > > future problem by open coding the shift in vmx_basic_vmcs_mem_type().  And IMO
> > > code like this
> > > 
> > > 	return (vmx_basic & VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_MASK) >>
> > > 	       VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_SHIFT;
> > > 
> > > is an unnecessary obfuscation when there is literally one user (the accessor).
> > > 
> > > Another idea would be to delete VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_SHIFT and VMX_BASIC_VMCS_SIZE_SHIFT,
> > > and either open code the values or use local const variables, but that also seems
> > > like a net negative, e.g. splits the effective definitions over too many locations.
> > 
> > Alternatively, we can add macros like below to <asm/vmx.h> close to
> > vmx_basic_vmcs_size() etc, so it's straightforward to see.
> > 
> > +#define VMX_BSAIC_VMCS12_SIZE	((u64)VMCS12_SIZE << 32)
> > +#define VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_WB	(MEM_TYPE_WB << 50)
> 
> Hmm, it's a bit hard to see it's specifically VMCS12 size, and given that prior
> to this series, VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_WB = 6, I'm hesitant to re-introduce/redefine
> that macro with a different value.
> 
> What if we add a helper in vmx.h to encode the VMCS info?  Then the #defines for
> the shifts can go away because the open coded shifts are colocated and more
> obviously related.  E.g.
> 
>   static inline u64 vmx_basic_encode_vmcs_info(u32 revision, u16 size, u8 memtype)
>   {
> 	return revision | ((u64)size << 32) | ((u64)memtype << 50);
>   }
> 
> 
> and
> 
>   static void nested_vmx_setup_basic(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs)
>   {
> 	/*
> 	 * This MSR reports some information about VMX support. We
> 	 * should return information about the VMX we emulate for the
> 	 * guest, and the VMCS structure we give it - not about the
> 	 * VMX support of the underlying hardware.
> 	 */
> 	msrs->basic = vmx_basic_encode_vmcs_info(VMCS12_REVISION, VMCS12_SIZE,
> 						 X86_MEMTYPE_WB);
> 
> 	msrs->basic |= VMX_BASIC_TRUE_CTLS
> 	if (cpu_has_vmx_basic_inout())
> 		msrs->basic |= VMX_BASIC_INOUT;
>   }

Yeah this is better.  Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-25 21:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-09  1:27 [PATCH v6 0/9] x86/cpu: KVM: Clean up PAT and VMX macros Sean Christopherson
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] x86/cpu: KVM: Add common defines for architectural memory types (PAT, MTRRs, etc.) Sean Christopherson
2024-03-27 11:13   ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-03 18:57     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-03 21:17       ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-03 21:42         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] x86/cpu: KVM: Move macro to encode PAT value to common header Sean Christopherson
2024-03-27 11:21   ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-01  5:28   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-04-03 21:03   ` Huang, Kai
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] KVM: x86: Stuff vCPU's PAT with default value at RESET, not creation Sean Christopherson
2024-03-27 11:22   ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-01  6:00   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] KVM: VMX: Move MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC bit defines to asm/vmx.h Sean Christopherson
2024-03-15 15:13   ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-27 10:37   ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-01  6:13   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-04-02  5:01     ` Li, Xin3
2024-04-02 14:28       ` Sean Christopherson
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] KVM: VMX: Track CPU's MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC as a single 64-bit value Sean Christopherson
2024-03-15 15:26   ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-27 10:38   ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-01  6:27   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] KVM: nVMX: Use macros and #defines in vmx_restore_vmx_basic() Sean Christopherson
2024-03-15 15:30   ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-27 10:53   ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-01  7:00   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] KVM VMX: Move MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC bit defines to asm/vmx.h Sean Christopherson
2024-03-15 15:43   ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-27 10:55   ` Huang, Kai
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] KVM: VMX: Open code VMX preemption timer rate mask in its accessor Sean Christopherson
2024-03-15 15:46   ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-15 17:54     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-01  7:07       ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-04-02 22:06         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-24 20:06           ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 10:05             ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-25 14:42               ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 21:44                 ` Huang, Kai [this message]
2024-04-25 14:18             ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-03-27 10:59   ` Huang, Kai
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] KVM: nVMX: Use macros and #defines in vmx_restore_vmx_misc() Sean Christopherson
2024-03-15 15:52   ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-27 11:02   ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-01  7:09   ` Xiaoyao Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26afec9c667327191850b17c511901623e91976e.camel@intel.com \
    --to=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shan.kang@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
    --cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).