KVM Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 01/10] s390/uv: don't call folio_wait_writeback() without a folio reference
Date: Wed,  8 May 2024 20:29:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240508182955.358628-2-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240508182955.358628-1-david@redhat.com>

folio_wait_writeback() requires that no spinlocks are held and that
a folio reference is held, as documented. After we dropped the PTL, the
folio could get freed concurrently. So grab a temporary reference.

Fixes: 214d9bbcd3a6 ("s390/mm: provide memory management functions for protected KVM guests")
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 arch/s390/kernel/uv.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
index 265fea37e030..016993e9eb72 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
@@ -318,6 +318,13 @@ int gmap_make_secure(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr, void *uvcb)
 			rc = make_folio_secure(folio, uvcb);
 			folio_unlock(folio);
 		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Once we drop the PTL, the folio may get unmapped and
+		 * freed immediately. We need a temporary reference.
+		 */
+		if (rc == -EAGAIN)
+			folio_get(folio);
 	}
 unlock:
 	pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptelock);
@@ -330,6 +337,7 @@ int gmap_make_secure(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr, void *uvcb)
 		 * completion, this is just a useless check, but it is safe.
 		 */
 		folio_wait_writeback(folio);
+		folio_put(folio);
 	} else if (rc == -EBUSY) {
 		/*
 		 * If we have tried a local drain and the folio refcount
-- 
2.45.0


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-08 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-08 18:29 [PATCH v3 00/10] s390: PG_arch_1+folio cleanups for uv+hugetlb David Hildenbrand
2024-05-08 18:29 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-05-08 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] s390/uv: gmap_make_secure() cleanups for further changes David Hildenbrand
2024-05-08 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] s390/uv: split large folios in gmap_make_secure() David Hildenbrand
2024-05-08 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] s390/uv: convert PG_arch_1 users to only work on small folios David Hildenbrand
2024-05-08 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] s390/uv: update PG_arch_1 comment David Hildenbrand
2024-05-08 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] s390/uv: make uv_convert_from_secure() a static function David Hildenbrand
2024-05-08 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] s390/uv: convert uv_destroy_owned_page() to uv_destroy_(folio|pte)() David Hildenbrand
2024-05-08 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] s390/uv: convert uv_convert_owned_from_secure() to uv_convert_from_secure_(folio|pte)() David Hildenbrand
2024-05-08 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] s390/uv: implement HAVE_ARCH_MAKE_FOLIO_ACCESSIBLE David Hildenbrand
2024-05-08 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] s390/hugetlb: convert PG_arch_1 code to work on folio->flags David Hildenbrand
2024-05-09 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] s390: PG_arch_1+folio cleanups for uv+hugetlb Heiko Carstens
2024-05-09 17:26   ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240508182955.358628-2-david@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).