From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86BFE1635D0; Tue, 7 May 2024 13:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715088672; cv=none; b=JQVZ8onT4TrSV9xhCRKgRnM5x18BhxozjfJCcDCA4qpGikcZg0UCeznonAoyKCu08Pv0epINFmYicmRZlYTbw8A5Z8HvsGUVXMNPzhNq1JbSjXx9PBE0Mvsqf+rzzGA051HN4DT8FJg9sTHTvNKB4HTDREPUNTnVTdq5t4fbczE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715088672; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sh0U92ZUvgTe/aCZ+bkGqG/NncKUwjz4yL0ln1X82PE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=kZhuGZudQODdBVdDfCz39LowkHxj8Z5GzTSHE+6jodjqlc6Odgl3BNfauesBrrO92zD4EoDF1miVd5tlKDUeQpeMnVsmjirNXRuQH2g+LWvqxbSPX5yXsnRqTsxns3zCY7EKhaTHIFAYuP3UuQB8aaJK9V/XFl6gicOVSFjR4aw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=TWqIZCRg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="TWqIZCRg" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1715088670; x=1746624670; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=sh0U92ZUvgTe/aCZ+bkGqG/NncKUwjz4yL0ln1X82PE=; b=TWqIZCRgLL0DyyuYub2YgbJC4rzsme2t+pP6s++g0tQ/6gw4oLwJmXQ8 wW+fFY1cMKsG0L/z7g1xAaorPCwhyL5WSwRSCBlCocN0YczYQnnI7DgFt 0yycYNAhm9hED/0sWP/hLOg/+p4QCjC8dklKd8/wOHGNRAxGq3Y3l266K KElz8onY+2Uqth5ChruphC9Z2W3A01813kO6bI6stjU1gln3o5kfGEg6l QH4Rd5cZOacn8INa5blgjrn59wA0ICRquUP7YcK8vL3f9krn0bf5YPPUl lldiMgQpRnrwOnJrwnre7b7C/tNOTz7CZgmYZ4jtpOBfAGewWg8PJ+N3M g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: YByrZyZdSM2O2/Sw5kPF6Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 8gyFD6K/SK+7Ism9FGt6ew== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11066"; a="28361542" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,261,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="28361542" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 May 2024 06:31:10 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ar19MniHT9SJvqj/tShcqQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Xtsxs8SxSSCEB13dpoJFJw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,261,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="33330769" Received: from tdx-lm.sh.intel.com ([10.239.53.27]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 May 2024 06:31:08 -0700 From: Wei Wang To: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wei Wang Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] KVM/x86: Enhancements to static calls Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 21:31:00 +0800 Message-Id: <20240507133103.15052-1-wei.w.wang@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This patchset introduces the kvm_x86_call() and kvm_pmu_call() macros to streamline the usage of static calls of kvm_x86_ops and kvm_pmu_ops. The current static_call() usage is a bit verbose and can lead to code alignment challenges, and the addition of kvm_x86_ prefix to hooks at the static_call() sites hinders code readability and navigation. The use of static_call_cond() is essentially the same as static_call() on x86, so it is replaced by static_call() to simplify the code. The changes have gone through my tests (guest launch, a few vPMU tests, live migration tests) without an issue. v3->v4 change: - Rename KVM_X86_CALL() to kvm_x86_call() and KVM_PMU_CALL() to kvm_pmu_call() as they resemble functions, so the lower-case style looks more readable. v2->v3 changes: - Change the KVM_X86_CALL() definition to have the parameters in their owen paratheses. - Update the .get_cpl() hook in pmu.c to use KVM_X86_CALL(). (it was omitted in v2) v1->v2 changes: - Replace static_call_cond() with static_call() - Rename KVM_X86_SC to KVM_X86_CALL, and updated all the call sites - Add KVM_PMU_CALL() - Add patch 4 and 5 to review the idea of removing KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL Wei Wang (3): KVM: x86: Replace static_call_cond() with static_call() KVM: x86: Introduce kvm_x86_call() to simplify static calls of kvm_x86_ops KVM: x86/pmu: Add kvm_pmu_call() to simplify static calls of kvm_pmu_ops arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 11 +- arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 6 +- arch/x86/kvm/irq.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h | 10 +- arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 42 +++-- arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h | 6 +- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 4 +- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 4 +- arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 29 +-- arch/x86/kvm/smm.c | 44 ++--- arch/x86/kvm/trace.h | 15 +- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 322 ++++++++++++++++---------------- arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/xen.c | 4 +- 16 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 246 deletions(-) base-commit: aec147c18856fa7115e14b9ad6a91c3ed2cf2e19 -- 2.27.0