From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Avoid rcu_core() if CPU just left guest vcpu
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 16:45:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <09a8f4f6-a692-4586-bb68-b0a524b7a5d8@paulmck-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zjyh-qRt3YewHsdP@LeoBras>
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 07:14:18AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 05:16:57AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > Here I suppose something like this can take care of not needing to convert
> > ms -> jiffies every rcu_pending():
> >
> > + nocb_patience_delay = msecs_to_jiffies(nocb_patience_delay);
> >
>
> Uh, there is more to it, actually. We need to make sure the user
> understands that we are rounding-down the value to multiple of a jiffy
> period, so it's not a surprise if the delay value is not exactly the same
> as the passed on kernel cmdline.
>
> So something like bellow diff should be ok, as this behavior is explained
> in the docs, and pr_info() will print the effective value.
>
> What do you think?
Good point, and I have taken your advice on making the documentation
say what it does.
> Thanks!
> Leo
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 0a3b0fd1910e..9a50be9fd9eb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -4974,20 +4974,28 @@
> otherwise be caused by callback floods through
> use of the ->nocb_bypass list. However, in the
> common non-flooded case, RCU queues directly to
> the main ->cblist in order to avoid the extra
> overhead of the ->nocb_bypass list and its lock.
> But if there are too many callbacks queued during
> a single jiffy, RCU pre-queues the callbacks into
> the ->nocb_bypass queue. The definition of "too
> many" is supplied by this kernel boot parameter.
>
> + rcutree.nocb_patience_delay= [KNL]
> + On callback-offloaded (rcu_nocbs) CPUs, avoid
> + disturbing RCU unless the grace period has
> + reached the specified age in milliseconds.
> + Defaults to zero. Large values will be capped
> + at five seconds. Values rounded-down to a multiple
> + of a jiffy period.
> +
> rcutree.qhimark= [KNL]
> Set threshold of queued RCU callbacks beyond which
> batch limiting is disabled.
>
> rcutree.qlowmark= [KNL]
> Set threshold of queued RCU callbacks below which
> batch limiting is re-enabled.
>
> rcutree.qovld= [KNL]
> Set threshold of queued RCU callbacks beyond which
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> index fcf2b4aa3441..62ede401420f 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> @@ -512,20 +512,21 @@ do { \
> local_irq_save(flags); \
> if (rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(&(rdp)->cblist)) \
> raw_spin_lock(&(rdp)->nocb_lock); \
> } while (0)
> #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */
> #define rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave(rdp, flags) local_irq_save(flags)
> #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */
>
> static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void);
> static bool rcu_nohz_full_cpu(void);
> +static bool rcu_on_patience_delay(void);
I don't think we need an access function, but will check below.
> /* Forward declarations for tree_stall.h */
> static void record_gp_stall_check_time(void);
> static void rcu_iw_handler(struct irq_work *iwp);
> static void check_cpu_stall(struct rcu_data *rdp);
> static void rcu_check_gp_start_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
> const unsigned long gpssdelay);
>
> /* Forward declarations for tree_exp.h. */
> static void sync_rcu_do_polled_gp(struct work_struct *wp);
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index 340bbefe5f65..639243b0410f 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -5,20 +5,21 @@
> * or preemptible semantics.
> *
> * Copyright Red Hat, 2009
> * Copyright IBM Corporation, 2009
> *
> * Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
> */
>
> #include "../locking/rtmutex_common.h"
> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
This is already pulled in by the enclosing tree.c file, so it should not
be necessary to include it again. (Or did you get a build failure when
leaving this out?)
> static bool rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> {
> /*
> * In order to read the offloaded state of an rdp in a safe
> * and stable way and prevent from its value to be changed
> * under us, we must either hold the barrier mutex, the cpu
> * hotplug lock (read or write) or the nocb lock. Local
> * non-preemptible reads are also safe. NOCB kthreads and
> * timers have their own means of synchronization against the
> @@ -86,20 +87,33 @@ static void __init rcu_bootup_announce_oddness(void)
> if (rcu_kick_kthreads)
> pr_info("\tKick kthreads if too-long grace period.\n");
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD))
> pr_info("\tRCU callback double-/use-after-free debug is enabled.\n");
> if (gp_preinit_delay)
> pr_info("\tRCU debug GP pre-init slowdown %d jiffies.\n", gp_preinit_delay);
> if (gp_init_delay)
> pr_info("\tRCU debug GP init slowdown %d jiffies.\n", gp_init_delay);
> if (gp_cleanup_delay)
> pr_info("\tRCU debug GP cleanup slowdown %d jiffies.\n", gp_cleanup_delay);
> + if (nocb_patience_delay < 0) {
> + pr_info("\tRCU NOCB CPU patience negative (%d), resetting to zero.\n",
> + nocb_patience_delay);
> + nocb_patience_delay = 0;
> + } else if (nocb_patience_delay > 5 * MSEC_PER_SEC) {
> + pr_info("\tRCU NOCB CPU patience too large (%d), resetting to %ld.\n",
> + nocb_patience_delay, 5 * MSEC_PER_SEC);
> + nocb_patience_delay = msecs_to_jiffies(5 * MSEC_PER_SEC);
> + } else if (nocb_patience_delay) {
> + nocb_patience_delay = msecs_to_jiffies(nocb_patience_delay);
> + pr_info("\tRCU NOCB CPU patience set to %d milliseconds.\n",
> + jiffies_to_msecs(nocb_patience_delay);
> + }
I just did this here at the end:
nocb_patience_delay_jiffies = msecs_to_jiffies(nocb_patience_delay);
Ah, you are wanting to print out the milliseconds after the rounding
to jiffies.
I am going to hold off on that for the moment, but I hear your request
and I have not yet said "no". ;-)
> if (!use_softirq)
> pr_info("\tRCU_SOFTIRQ processing moved to rcuc kthreads.\n");
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG))
> pr_info("\tRCU debug extended QS entry/exit.\n");
> rcupdate_announce_bootup_oddness();
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
>
> static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp, bool wake);
> @@ -1260,10 +1274,29 @@ static bool rcu_nohz_full_cpu(void)
>
> /*
> * Bind the RCU grace-period kthreads to the housekeeping CPU.
> */
> static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void)
> {
> if (!tick_nohz_full_enabled())
> return;
> housekeeping_affine(current, HK_TYPE_RCU);
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * Is this CPU a NO_HZ_FULL CPU that should ignore RCU if the time since the
> + * start of current grace period is smaller than nocb_patience_delay ?
> + *
> + * This code relies on the fact that all NO_HZ_FULL CPUs are also
> + * RCU_NOCB_CPU CPUs.
> + */
> +static bool rcu_on_patience_delay(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
You lost me on this one. Why do we need the #ifdef instead of
IS_ENABLED()? Also, please note that rcu_nohz_full_cpu() is already a
compile-time @false in CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=n kernels.
> + if (!nocb_patience_delay)
> + return false;
We get this automatically with the comparison below, right? If so, we
are not gaining much by creating the helper function. Or am I missing
some trick here?
Thanx, Paul
> + if (time_before(jiffies, READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_start) + nocb_patience_delay))
> + return true;
> +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
> + return false;
> +}
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 7560e204198b..7a2d94370ab4 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -169,20 +169,22 @@ static int kthread_prio = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST) ? 1 : 0;
> module_param(kthread_prio, int, 0444);
>
> /* Delay in jiffies for grace-period initialization delays, debug only. */
>
> static int gp_preinit_delay;
> module_param(gp_preinit_delay, int, 0444);
> static int gp_init_delay;
> module_param(gp_init_delay, int, 0444);
> static int gp_cleanup_delay;
> module_param(gp_cleanup_delay, int, 0444);
> +static int nocb_patience_delay;
> +module_param(nocb_patience_delay, int, 0444);
>
> // Add delay to rcu_read_unlock() for strict grace periods.
> static int rcu_unlock_delay;
> #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD
> module_param(rcu_unlock_delay, int, 0444);
> #endif
>
> /*
> * This rcu parameter is runtime-read-only. It reflects
> * a minimum allowed number of objects which can be cached
> @@ -4340,25 +4342,27 @@ static int rcu_pending(int user)
> lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
>
> /* Check for CPU stalls, if enabled. */
> check_cpu_stall(rdp);
>
> /* Does this CPU need a deferred NOCB wakeup? */
> if (rcu_nocb_need_deferred_wakeup(rdp, RCU_NOCB_WAKE))
> return 1;
>
> /* Is this a nohz_full CPU in userspace or idle? (Ignore RCU if so.) */
> - if ((user || rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle()) && rcu_nohz_full_cpu())
> + gp_in_progress = rcu_gp_in_progress();
> + if ((user || rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() ||
> + (gp_in_progress && rcu_on_patience_delay())) &&
> + rcu_nohz_full_cpu())
> return 0;
>
> /* Is the RCU core waiting for a quiescent state from this CPU? */
> - gp_in_progress = rcu_gp_in_progress();
> if (rdp->core_needs_qs && !rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.norm && gp_in_progress)
> return 1;
>
> /* Does this CPU have callbacks ready to invoke? */
> if (!rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp) &&
> rcu_segcblist_ready_cbs(&rdp->cblist))
> return 1;
>
> /* Has RCU gone idle with this CPU needing another grace period? */
> if (!gp_in_progress && rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rdp->cblist) &&
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-09 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-28 17:19 [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Avoid rcu_core() if CPU just left guest vcpu Leonardo Bras
2024-03-28 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] kvm: Implement guest_exit_last_time() Leonardo Bras
2024-03-28 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] rcu: Ignore RCU in nohz_full cpus if it was running a guest recently Leonardo Bras
2024-04-01 15:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-04-01 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Avoid rcu_core() if CPU just left guest vcpu Sean Christopherson
2024-04-05 13:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2024-04-05 14:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-06 0:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-04-08 17:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-08 18:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-04-08 20:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-08 21:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-04-08 21:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-08 22:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-04-08 23:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-08 23:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-04-10 2:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2024-04-15 19:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2024-04-15 21:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-16 12:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2024-04-16 14:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-17 16:14 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2024-04-17 17:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-03 20:44 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-05-06 18:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2024-05-07 18:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-07 22:36 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-05-03 18:42 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-05-03 19:09 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-05-03 21:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-03 22:00 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-05-03 22:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-07 17:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-07 19:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-07 21:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-07 21:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-07 23:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-08 0:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-08 2:51 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-05-08 3:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-08 6:19 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-05-08 14:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-09 3:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-09 8:16 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-05-09 10:14 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-05-09 23:45 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2024-05-10 16:06 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-05-10 16:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-10 17:12 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-05-10 17:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-10 19:50 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-05-10 21:15 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-05-10 21:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-09 22:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-09 23:07 ` Leonardo Bras Soares Passos
2024-05-11 2:08 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-05-08 3:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-08 4:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-08 14:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-08 15:35 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=09a8f4f6-a692-4586-bb68-b0a524b7a5d8@paulmck-laptop \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
--cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).