Linux Kernel Summit discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Cc: ksummit <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:35:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180918093558.7ad355dc@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180917072250.5bbcb736@coco.lan>

On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 07:22:50 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> wrote:

> A common practice there is that, when someone rewrites the implementation
> of some symbol using EXPORT_SYMBOL() is to use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() at
> the new implementation, to make clear about our desire that media modules
> should be GPL'd, but when we do simpler changes (even adding/removing
> parameters at the interface), we tend not to change it[1].

To add to this bike-shed discussion, my view is that if the function is
unique to Linux, it should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(), and if it is a
common functionality among all operating systems (like request_irq())
then I would consider it EXPORT_SYMBOL().

The tracing infrastructure that we have is unique to Linux and thus
all functions are EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). Proprietary modules can't even
add trace events without breaking that. Although they could use kprobes
and function based events (when we finish that).

-- Steve

      reply	other threads:[~2018-09-18 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-13 19:43 [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL Dan Williams
2018-09-13 20:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-09-13 20:14 ` Greg KH
2018-09-13 21:04   ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-09-14  6:32     ` Dave Airlie
2018-09-14  7:08       ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-09-16 12:58         ` Wolfram Sang
2018-09-16 22:15         ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-09-17 10:22           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-18 13:35             ` Steven Rostedt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180918093558.7ad355dc@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).