Ksummit-Discuss Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: esr@thyrsus.com, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH] code-of-conduct: Remove explicit list of discrimination factors
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:35:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <22aae042-5ef3-20df-6960-fc8ae3cd5506@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181010223319.GA31256@thyrsus.com>

On 10/10/18 15:33, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>:
>>> The words removed by this patch are a political statement.
>>
>> Choosing not to say those words is a political statement.
> 
> The situation is not symmetrical.  Choosing the protected classes
> in the CoC is a *change* in its implied politics. 
> 
> It's a change that is, obviously from LKML traffic, very contentious.
> If this were a tpurely technical matter, it would be described as
> not backwards-compatible.
> 
> It's a change that, I submit, should not have been made without a clear
> consensus *in favor* of the change.
> 
> Our culture has a process for this. It's called RFCs. If we want to
> designate protected classes to be called out in conductt guidelines,
> an RFC should be floated first and the change should be made only
> if rough consensus has been achieved.
> 

Thank you for stating that clearly and concisely Eric.

I will bow out of further discussion on this specific point as I
have already seen this concept discussed on many threads already
in recent weeks.

-Frank

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-10 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-07  8:51 [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH] code-of-conduct: Remove explicit list of discrimination factors Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-07 11:35 ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-07 17:18   ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-10-08  2:29     ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-08 14:12       ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-08 14:27         ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-10-08 14:36           ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-08 14:30         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-08 15:43           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-08  8:55   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-08 12:02   ` Mark Brown
2018-10-08 15:42   ` Alan Cox
2018-10-08 16:14     ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-10 20:55 ` Frank Rowand
2018-10-10 21:15   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-10 22:16   ` Josh Triplett
     [not found]     ` <20181010223319.GA31256@thyrsus.com>
2018-10-10 23:35       ` Frank Rowand [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-10-17  7:19 Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-17  9:13 ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-17  9:31   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-17 13:32     ` Guenter Roeck
2018-10-17 15:22       ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-17 15:21     ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-17 15:49       ` James Bottomley
2018-10-17 16:00         ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-17 18:36       ` Mark Brown
2018-10-17 13:45   ` Guenter Roeck
2018-10-17 16:18   ` Joe Perches
2018-10-22 21:06 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=22aae042-5ef3-20df-6960-fc8ae3cd5506@gmail.com \
    --to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=esr@thyrsus.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).