Keyrings Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: "Eric Biggers" <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: <fsverity@lists.linux.dev>, <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Victor Hsieh" <victorhsieh@google.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fsverity: skip PKCS#7 parser when keyring is empty
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 10:43:06 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CUHW2GFPQ5KC.3SOJM5AMOZ9T0@suppilovahvero> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230802043158.GC1543@sol.localdomain>

On Wed Aug 2, 2023 at 7:31 AM EEST, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:27:15AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Wed Aug 2, 2023 at 7:15 AM EEST, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> > >
> > > If an fsverity builtin signature is given for a file but the
> > > ".fs-verity" keyring is empty, there's no real reason to run the PKCS#7
> > > parser.  Skip this to avoid the PKCS#7 attack surface when builtin
> > > signature support is configured into the kernel but is not being used.
> > >
> > > This is a hardening improvement, not a fix per se, but I've added
> > > Fixes and Cc stable to get it out to more users.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 432434c9f8e1 ("fs-verity: support builtin file signatures")
> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > v2: check keyring and return early before allocating formatted digest
> > >
> > >  fs/verity/signature.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/verity/signature.c b/fs/verity/signature.c
> > > index b95acae64eac6..8f474702aa249 100644
> > > --- a/fs/verity/signature.c
> > > +++ b/fs/verity/signature.c
> > > @@ -62,6 +62,21 @@ int fsverity_verify_signature(const struct fsverity_info *vi,
> > >  		return 0;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > +	if (fsverity_keyring->keys.nr_leaves_on_tree == 0) {
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * The ".fs-verity" keyring is empty, due to builtin signatures
> > > +		 * being supported by the kernel but not actually being used.
> > > +		 * In this case, verify_pkcs7_signature() would always return an
> > > +		 * error, usually ENOKEY.  It could also be EBADMSG if the
> > > +		 * PKCS#7 is malformed, but that isn't very important to
> > > +		 * distinguish.  So, just skip to ENOKEY to avoid the attack
> > > +		 * surface of the PKCS#7 parser, which would otherwise be
> > > +		 * reachable by any task able to execute FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY.
> > > +		 */
> > > +		fsverity_err(inode, "fs-verity keyring is empty");
> > > +		return -ENOKEY;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > >  	d = kzalloc(sizeof(*d) + hash_alg->digest_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > >  	if (!d)
> > >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > base-commit: 456ae5fe9b448f44ebe98b391a3bae9c75df465e
> > > -- 
> > > 2.41.0
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> > 
> > applied
> > 
> > BR, Jarkko
>
> Hi Jarkko, thanks for the review!
>
> I actually intended to take this through the fsverity tree.  Is that okay?
>
> BTW, we could actually make this change to verify_pkcs7_signature() itself.
> I wasn't sure it would be appropriate for all callers, though.  Any thoughts?

It is OK for me. I just wanted make sure that I don't get yelled let's
say month from now, why I haven't picked it already. That's why the
"more eager" approach :-)

I'll drop it from my master branch today.

BR, Jarkko

      reply	other threads:[~2023-08-02  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-02  4:15 [PATCH v2] fsverity: skip PKCS#7 parser when keyring is empty Eric Biggers
2023-08-02  4:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-08-02  4:31   ` Eric Biggers
2023-08-02  7:43     ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CUHW2GFPQ5KC.3SOJM5AMOZ9T0@suppilovahvero \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=victorhsieh@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).