Keyrings Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Cc: "Eric Snowberg" <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
	"Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito" <eesposit@redhat.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"lennart@poettering.net" <lennart@poettering.net>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
	"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	"Vitaly Kuznetsov" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"keyrings@vger.kernel.org" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] x86/boot: add .sbat section to the bzImage
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 11:27:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58a3914d2c147d926a09ca833550031828098b31.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMw=ZnREf8L1hrGgFUMrcBJNf-7ZTs0hMNFMB_nNAvyV=Pe2Nw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2023-07-21 at 16:22 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 at 16:14, Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> wrote:
[...]
> > Anyway, I wasn't aware that SUSE doesn't embed their cert in Shim,
> > we'll have to take that in consideration for sure.
> 
> Actually, a dev from SUSE's security just confirmed they embed their
> CA in Shim like every other distribution. Nobody seems to be aware of
> any example where a distribution relies exclusively on MoK - and
> that's understandable, as that would mean failing to boot by default
> on a new machine. Do you have any example/cases where that's actually
> happening? Outside development/local signing/etc.

It happened last year for an openSUSE Leap update that changed the
kernel signing certificate.  I got asked to confirm acceptance of the
new key and it got put in my MokList, which now has three certificates:
two suse ones and my own.

James


      reply	other threads:[~2023-07-21 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230711154449.1378385-1-eesposit@redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <ZK/9MlTh435FP5Ji@gambale.home>
     [not found]   ` <ZLABozIRVGmwuIBf@gambale.home>
     [not found]     ` <ba2354dc63fd741d2d351b18d4312d0771c0935d.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
     [not found]       ` <ZLVyvAXwtemx1I6p@redhat.com>
     [not found]         ` <0aa647f719103e8620d7209cbde40f04a7334749.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
2023-07-20 16:46           ` [RFC PATCH v2] x86/boot: add .sbat section to the bzImage Eric Snowberg
2023-07-20 17:07             ` James Bottomley
2023-07-20 18:10               ` Eric Snowberg
2023-07-20 19:16             ` Luca Boccassi
2023-07-21  0:02               ` Eric Snowberg
2023-07-21  8:55                 ` Luca Boccassi
2023-07-21 11:24                   ` James Bottomley
2023-07-21 12:40                     ` Luca Boccassi
2023-07-21 13:01                       ` James Bottomley
2023-07-21 13:10                         ` Luca Boccassi
2023-07-21 13:33                           ` James Bottomley
2023-07-21 15:14                             ` Luca Boccassi
2023-07-21 15:22                               ` Luca Boccassi
2023-07-21 15:27                                 ` James Bottomley [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58a3914d2c147d926a09ca833550031828098b31.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lennart@poettering.net \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).