[PATCH v2 0/2] kexec: fix potential cmem->ranges out of bounds

From: fuqiang wang <fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] kexec: fix potential cmem->ranges out of bounds
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 13:57:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231220055733.100325-1-fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn> (raw)

This series tries to fix the potential cmem->ranges out of bounds.

On the v1 version, there are still some issues that need to be
discussed, as follows:

1) Whether we need have the cmem->ranges[] partly changed, or keep it
unchanged when OOB happened. Previously discussed link:[1].

2) Set cmem->max_nr_ranges in crash_setup_memmap_entries() to 1 or 2.
Previously discussed link:[2].

3) To enhance crash_setup_memmap_entries() readability, how to move
code. Previously discussed link:[2].

v2:
  - Fix potential out of bounds in crash_setup_memmap_entries().
  - Add a comment in fill_up_crash_elf_data() to explain why the array
    size do not need to be changed.

v1:
  Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231127025641.62210-1-fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn/

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZXrY7QbXAlxydsSC@MiWiFi-R3L-srv/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/273284e8-7680-4f5f-8065-c5d780987e59@easystack.cn/

fuqiang wang (2):
  x86/kexec: Fix potential out of bounds in crash_setup_memmap_entries()
  kexec: Fix potential out of bounds in crash_exclude_mem_range()

 arch/x86/kernel/crash.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
 kernel/crash_core.c     |  7 +++----
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

-- 
2.42.0

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec