* [Bug #14656] Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6
2009-11-21 14:46 2.6.32-rc8-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-11-21 14:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-11-21 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Lucas C. Villa Real,
"reiserfs-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14656
Subject : Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6
Submitter : Lucas C. Villa Real <lucasvr-9gmU7qdNRpmhPH1hqNUYSQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-11-19 3:48 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125860255229092&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14656] Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6
2009-12-29 15:26 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions 2.6.31 -> 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Lucas C. Villa Real,
"reiserfs-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14656
Subject : Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6
Submitter : Lucas C. Villa Real <lucasvr-9gmU7qdNRpmhPH1hqNUYSQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-11-19 3:48 (41 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125860255229092&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14656] Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6
2010-01-10 22:45 2.6.33-rc3-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.31 -> 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-01-10 22:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-01-10 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Lucas C. Villa Real, "reiserfs-devel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14656
Subject : Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6
Submitter : Lucas C. Villa Real <lucasvr@gobolinux.org>
Date : 2009-11-19 3:48 (53 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125860255229092&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14656] Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6
2010-01-24 22:15 2.6.33-rc5: Reported regressions 2.6.31 -> 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-01-24 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-01-24 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Lucas C. Villa Real,
"reiserfs-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14656
Subject : Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6
Submitter : Lucas C. Villa Real <lucasvr-9gmU7qdNRpmhPH1hqNUYSQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-11-19 3:48 (67 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125860255229092&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14656] Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6
2010-02-01 0:38 2.6.33-rc6: Reported regressions 2.6.31 -> 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-01 0:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-01 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Lucas C. Villa Real, "reiserfs-devel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14656
Subject : Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6
Submitter : Lucas C. Villa Real <lucasvr@gobolinux.org>
Date : 2009-11-19 3:48 (74 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125860255229092&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14656] Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6
2010-02-08 0:13 2.6.33-rc7: Reported regressions 2.6.31 -> 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-08 0:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-08 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Lucas C. Villa Real,
"reiserfs-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14656
Subject : Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6
Submitter : Lucas C. Villa Real <lucasvr-9gmU7qdNRpmhPH1hqNUYSQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-11-19 3:48 (81 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125860255229092&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14656] Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6
2010-02-14 23:46 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions 2.6.31 -> 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-02-14 23:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-02-14 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Lucas C. Villa Real,
"reiserfs-devel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14656
Subject : Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6
Submitter : Lucas C. Villa Real <lucasvr@gobolinux.org>
Date : 2009-11-19 3:48 (88 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125860255229092&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14943] nfs regression?
[not found] ` <wj3ZQZlk_KB.A.M6B.QsagLB@chimera>
@ 2010-02-22 2:13 ` Américo Wang
[not found] ` <2375c9f91002211813m8f637c1g73c4314eab96f81e-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Américo Wang @ 2010-02-22 2:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Nikola Ciprich
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14943
> Subject : nfs regression?
> Submitter : Nikola Ciprich <extmaillist@linuxbox.cz>
> Date : 2009-12-28 12:10 (56 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126200276223524&w=4
>
This seems that we missed checking XPT_DEAD too.
Nikola, does adding !test_bit(XPT_DEAD, &xprt->xpt_flags) in the same
place as commit b292cf9ce70d221c3f04f help?
Something like:
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
index 7d1f9e9..7b66c7f 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
@@ -700,7 +700,8 @@ int svc_recv(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, long timeout)
len = 0;
if (test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags) &&
- !test_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags)) {
+ !test_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags) &&
+ !test_bit(XPT_DEAD, &xprt->xpt_flags)) {
struct svc_xprt *newxpt;
newxpt = xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_accept(xprt);
if (newxpt) {
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15309] reiserfs issue with 2.6.32.8
[not found] ` <wj3ZQZlk_KB.A.Ye.iqagLB@chimera>
@ 2010-02-22 2:18 ` Bret Towe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bret Towe @ 2010-02-22 2:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15309
> Subject : reiserfs issue with 2.6.32.8
> Submitter : Bret Towe <magnade@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-02-14 18:23 (8 days old)
> Message-ID : <dda83e781002141023t2abe95b8w83f59d6f411f68a2@mail.gmail.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126617185512707&w=4
>
>
I'm still doing some bisecting trying to narrow down the problem
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14656] Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6
[not found] ` <wj3ZQZlk_KB.A.Q0C.hwagLB@chimera>
@ 2010-02-24 7:58 ` Christian Kujau
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-02-24 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Lucas C. Villa Real
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
reiserfs-devel, aneesh.kumar
Lucas,
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 at 22:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14656
> Subject : Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125860255229092&w=4
Your initial report said:
kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000b2cb
kernel: IP: [<c0198266>] __rmqueue+0x98/0x36c
However, the backtraces you posted later (with DEBUG_LIST=y) always
contained:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:51 list_del+0x41/0x60()
Hardware name: MacBook3,1
list_del corruption. next->prev should be c1b71018, but was 00005095
Not being a kernel hacker, this "list_del corruption" looks kinda weird. At
one point[0] it was suggested to reproduce this with an untainted
(ndiswrapper?) kernel; on other occurences[1] some code surgery was indeed
needed.
I'm afraid I can't help here though, just thinking out loud...
Christian.
[0] http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/12/214
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/26/85
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0902.1/01992.html
--
BOFH excuse #275:
Bit rot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14943] nfs regression?
[not found] ` <2375c9f91002211813m8f637c1g73c4314eab96f81e-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-03-08 20:21 ` Nikola Ciprich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Nikola Ciprich @ 2010-03-08 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Américo Wang
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Maciej Rutecki, nikola.ciprich-Jp3n8lUXroTtwjQa/ONI9g
YES!
seems like 2.6.32.8 with your patch included finally doesn't
spit any backtraces and peername failed errors!
will You push this upstream + to stable?
thanks a lot for Your help!
have a nice day
with best regards
nik
> This seems that we missed checking XPT_DEAD too.
>
> Nikola, does adding !test_bit(XPT_DEAD, &xprt->xpt_flags) in the same
> place as commit b292cf9ce70d221c3f04f help?
>
> Something like:
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> index 7d1f9e9..7b66c7f 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> @@ -700,7 +700,8 @@ int svc_recv(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, long timeout)
>
> len = 0;
> if (test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags) &&
> - !test_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags)) {
> + !test_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags) &&
> + !test_bit(XPT_DEAD, &xprt->xpt_flags)) {
> struct svc_xprt *newxpt;
> newxpt = xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_accept(xprt);
> if (newxpt) {
>
--
-------------------------------------
Nikola CIPRICH
LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava
tel.: +420 596 603 142
fax: +420 596 621 273
mobil: +420 777 093 799
www.linuxbox.cz
mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
email servis: servis-Jp3n8lUXroTtwjQa/ONI9g@public.gmane.org
-------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-08 20:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <4u4d-2M3yXH.A.XW.XqagLB@chimera>
[not found] ` <wj3ZQZlk_KB.A.M6B.QsagLB@chimera>
2010-02-22 2:13 ` [Bug #14943] nfs regression? Américo Wang
[not found] ` <2375c9f91002211813m8f637c1g73c4314eab96f81e-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-08 20:21 ` Nikola Ciprich
[not found] ` <wj3ZQZlk_KB.A.Ye.iqagLB@chimera>
2010-02-22 2:18 ` [Bug #15309] reiserfs issue with 2.6.32.8 Bret Towe
[not found] ` <wj3ZQZlk_KB.A.Q0C.hwagLB@chimera>
2010-02-24 7:58 ` [Bug #14656] Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6 Christian Kujau
2010-02-14 23:46 2.6.33-rc8: Reported regressions 2.6.31 -> 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:52 ` [Bug #14656] Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-08 0:13 2.6.33-rc7: Reported regressions 2.6.31 -> 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-08 0:28 ` [Bug #14656] Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-01 0:38 2.6.33-rc6: Reported regressions 2.6.31 -> 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-01 0:43 ` [Bug #14656] Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-24 22:15 2.6.33-rc5: Reported regressions 2.6.31 -> 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-24 22:22 ` [Bug #14656] Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-10 22:45 2.6.33-rc3-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.31 -> 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-10 22:56 ` [Bug #14656] Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:26 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions 2.6.31 -> 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:28 ` [Bug #14656] Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-21 14:46 2.6.32-rc8-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-21 14:51 ` [Bug #14656] Oops at __rmqueue+0x98 with 2.6.32-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).