intel-wired-lan.lists.osuosl.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, jiri@nvidia.com, michal.kubiak@intel.com,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, pio.raczynski@gmail.com,
	sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com,
	wojciech.drewek@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v4 5/8] ice: allocate devlink for subfunction
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:22:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZiKoWmX34QEdEgJO@mev-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZiFXj-58u2shLL3g@nanopsycho>

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 07:25:35PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:11:38PM CEST, michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 05:43:25PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 04:46:23PM CEST, michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com wrote:
> >> >On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 03:02:49PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> >> Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 02:48:53PM CEST, michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com wrote:
> >> >> >On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 02:04:21PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> >> >> Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 04:20:25PM CEST, michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com wrote:
> >> >> >> >From: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@intel.com>
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> [...]
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >+/**
> >> >> >> >+ * ice_allocate_sf - Allocate devlink and return SF structure pointer
> >> >> >> >+ * @dev: the device to allocate for
> >> >> >> >+ *
> >> >> >> >+ * Allocate a devlink instance for SF.
> >> >> >> >+ *
> >> >> >> >+ * Return: void pointer to allocated memory
> >> >> >> >+ */
> >> >> >> >+struct ice_sf_priv *ice_allocate_sf(struct device *dev)
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> This is devlink instance for SF auxdev. Please make sure it is properly
> >> >> >> linked with the devlink port instance using devl_port_fn_devlink_set()
> >> >> >> See mlx5 implementation for inspiration.
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I am going to do it in the last patchset. I know that it isn't the best
> >> >> 
> >> >> Where? Either I'm blind or you don't do it.
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >
> >> >You told me to split few patches from first patchset [1]. We agree that
> >> >there will be too many patches for one submission, so I split it into
> >> >3:
> >> >- 1/3 devlink prework (already accepted)
> >> >- 2/3 base subfunction (this patchset)
> >> >- 3/3 port representor refactor to support subfunction (I am going to
> >> >  include it there)
> >> 
> >> Sorry, but how is this relevant to my suggestion to use
> >> devl_port_fn_devlink_set() which you apparently don't?
> >> 
> >
> >Devlink port to link with is introduced in the port representor part.
> >Strange, but it fitted to my splitting. I can move
> >activation/deactivation part also to this patchset (as there is no
> >devlink port to call it on) if you want.
> 
> You have 7 more patches to use in this set. No problem. Please do it all
> at once.
> 

Ok, as whole will still not fit into 15 I sent preparation patchset for
representor [1].

Now the patchset based on this preparation have 14 patches, so I hope it
is fine (including linking that you mentioned). I will send it right
after the preparation patchset is applied.

I am going on the 2 weeks vacation, so my replies will be delayed.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240419171336.11617-1-michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com/T/#t

Thanks,
Michal

> 
> >
> >> 
> >> >
> >> >[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240301115414.502097-1-michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com/
> >> >
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >Michal
> >> >
> >> >> >option to split patchesets like that, but it was hard to do it differently.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Thanks,
> >> >> >Michal
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >+{
> >> >> >> >+	return ice_devlink_alloc(dev, sizeof(struct ice_sf_priv),
> >> >> >> >+				 &ice_sf_devlink_ops);
> >> >> >> >+}
> >> >> >> >+
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> [...]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-19 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-17 14:20 [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v4 0/8] ice: support devlink subfunction Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-17 14:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v4 1/8] ice: add new VSI type for subfunctions Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-17 14:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v4 2/8] ice: export ice ndo_ops functions Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-17 14:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v4 3/8] ice: add basic devlink subfunctions support Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-17 14:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v4 4/8] ice: treat subfunction VSI the same as PF VSI Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-17 14:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v4 5/8] ice: allocate devlink for subfunction Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-18 12:04   ` Jiri Pirko
2024-04-18 12:48     ` Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-18 13:02       ` Jiri Pirko
2024-04-18 14:46         ` Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-18 15:43           ` Jiri Pirko
2024-04-18 16:11             ` Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-18 17:25               ` Jiri Pirko
2024-04-19 17:22                 ` Michal Swiatkowski [this message]
2024-04-17 14:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v4 6/8] ice: base subfunction aux driver Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-18  7:57   ` Shay Drori
2024-04-18 14:47     ` Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-18 13:02   ` Jiri Pirko
2024-04-18 14:47     ` Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-17 14:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v4 7/8] ice: implement netdev for subfunction Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-17 14:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v4 8/8] ice: allow to activate and deactivate subfunction Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-18  7:53   ` Shay Drori
2024-04-18  8:12     ` Shay Drori
2024-04-18 11:55       ` Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-18 12:20         ` Shay Drori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZiKoWmX34QEdEgJO@mev-dev \
    --to=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.kubiak@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pio.raczynski@gmail.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
    --cc=wojciech.drewek@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).