Intel-GFX Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
	John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/dg2: wait for HuC load completion before running selftests
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:15:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240410201505.894594-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> (raw)

On DG2, submissions to VCS engines tied to a gem context are blocked
until the HuC is loaded. Since some selftests do use a gem context,
wait for the HuC load to complete before running the tests to avoid
contamination.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10564
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
---
 .../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_selftest.c    | 36 ++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_selftest.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_selftest.c
index ee79e0809a6d..fee76c1d2f45 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_selftest.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_selftest.c
@@ -154,6 +154,30 @@ __wait_gsc_proxy_completed(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 		pr_warn(DRIVER_NAME "Timed out waiting for gsc_proxy_completion!\n");
 }
 
+static void
+__wait_gsc_huc_load_completed(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+{
+	/* this only applies to DG2, so we only care about GT0 */
+	struct intel_huc *huc = &to_gt(i915)->uc.huc;
+	bool need_to_wait = (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_PXP) &&
+			     intel_huc_wait_required(huc));
+	/*
+	 * The GSC and PXP mei bringup depends on the kernel boot ordering, so
+	 * to account for the worst case scenario the HuC code waits for up to
+	 * 10s for the GSC driver to load and then another 5s for the PXP
+	 * component to bind before giving up, even though those steps normally
+	 * complete in less than a second from the i915 load. We match that
+	 * timeout here, but we expect to bail early due to the fence being
+	 * signalled even in a failure case, as it is extremely unlikely that
+	 * both components will use their full timeout.
+	 */
+	unsigned long timeout_ms = 15000;
+
+	if (need_to_wait &&
+	    wait_for(i915_sw_fence_done(&huc->delayed_load.fence), timeout_ms))
+		pr_warn(DRIVER_NAME "Timed out waiting for huc load via GSC!\n");
+}
+
 static int __run_selftests(const char *name,
 			   struct selftest *st,
 			   unsigned int count,
@@ -228,14 +252,16 @@ int i915_mock_selftests(void)
 
 int i915_live_selftests(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = pdev_to_i915(pdev);
 	int err;
 
 	if (!i915_selftest.live)
 		return 0;
 
-	__wait_gsc_proxy_completed(pdev_to_i915(pdev));
+	__wait_gsc_proxy_completed(i915);
+	__wait_gsc_huc_load_completed(i915);
 
-	err = run_selftests(live, pdev_to_i915(pdev));
+	err = run_selftests(live, i915);
 	if (err) {
 		i915_selftest.live = err;
 		return err;
@@ -251,14 +277,16 @@ int i915_live_selftests(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 
 int i915_perf_selftests(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = pdev_to_i915(pdev);
 	int err;
 
 	if (!i915_selftest.perf)
 		return 0;
 
-	__wait_gsc_proxy_completed(pdev_to_i915(pdev));
+	__wait_gsc_proxy_completed(i915);
+	__wait_gsc_huc_load_completed(i915);
 
-	err = run_selftests(perf, pdev_to_i915(pdev));
+	err = run_selftests(perf, i915);
 	if (err) {
 		i915_selftest.perf = err;
 		return err;
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-10 20:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-10 20:15 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2024-04-10 22:28 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dg2: wait for HuC load completion before running selftests Patchwork
2024-04-16 19:03 ` [PATCH] " John Harrison
2024-04-17 21:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dg2: wait for HuC load completion before running selftests (rev2) Patchwork
2024-04-19  0:00 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240410201505.894594-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).