From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 352501D546 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 21:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.52 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707340477; cv=none; b=Avpc4DmO9DJtneBU3SI9DZrw9/sCDgds7HC6b11JuAiGH3j6vrlqyR+/FamJTUXcQt2vX0TVz0+4vUzY/NsPF9WRxPqRWZQ5mPKSlNHbxO/oO5aXfr9QckitjvnsrPoQha2CTtPwNlzlSPY3t5LN0XqAe9zGkJkJVtQKx1EirUQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707340477; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VREXeRe4lvj8+yddb/gUHROtYG2S9s8dKgNSEBgXHl0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YNT/V62OAkIsBS7NMnU6bdmU8LK3/8nvopDk0SjX/uOGuxALZaWkntENe2H9RLeR8/G8GQUHP/h22AT9LgQt1VEk3zfkjYQciNJEqk6TYLFx70KazmkoXBsGvzXCSDoibl6PHgwlmFwO3Uw3gHfRUM+fuIXA5+B3B48xzuweSHk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=M/xJhJny; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="M/xJhJny" Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6AC2EE2E; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 16:14:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=VREXeRe4lvj8+yddb/gUHROtYG2S9s8dKgNSEB gXHl0=; b=M/xJhJnyHCaclP2pw08on6ujQPiBrRRzkIqPEQ2p3hkWaiSU2ScXeq Zd+KQaiYHryWpE9b6Rufy6f3hNfaCmz7LdQx+ryk/fGz6azCzdDiSopowJnTd6+q 2ZCgzRXpCFo8UyJgGPGyNi4ZqSyJ1QDKDxggAGU76hNI2Ua2LQqIM= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94CB52EE2D; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 16:14:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.165.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B4A02EE29; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 16:14:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Josh Steadmon Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, johannes.schindelin@gmx.de, peff@peff.net, phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] test-tool: add unit test suite runner In-Reply-To: (Josh Steadmon's message of "Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:50:25 -0800") References: Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 13:14:30 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E3238542-C5FD-11EE-8CE6-F515D2CDFF5E-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Josh Steadmon writes: > Some known remaining bits of work: > * We should investigate switching the Windows CI to use `test-tool` > instead of prove. However, Windows CI seems broken on > jk/unit-tests-buildfix, and I haven't had time to determine why. > * We should determine whether it is confusing or otherwise harmful to > people's workflow to have the unit tests run in parallel with shell > tests when using prove as the default test target. The first one seems to have been resolved. The latter can happen while it cooks, I would presume. If there is no other comments, let's mark the topic for 'next'. Thanks.