From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23B831DA53 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714255793; cv=none; b=LT7SXY5HPod3fINGF8x/YtkzixHEyctuc6F4l4HMOHmuiKUl96rDulf6g1Oul1KOzqtmFaJkF+yWELBJz/fNvw/dnLl23M/vN+s/5E/db+nAtcaUjdBb7a82NO1mD1EkqvcEHjutBX8mYwi7MzkHcsqTRVLNdmPszFDFyYjqDlo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714255793; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ShVBfdm/GqZLjsBVyCZGlPIe1TpTZm0hesIObLupIlE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=p3PKFWieaIdKJQhizQSw5jTIcKkAengp0cz9uL5Swfza3UAR0zL6hF8OtvDMtNBOwoYBuKfZEkCjp+TcwZ5rxubl66B5jm+eIY/zZ4ruULe+WPbdPVreNFgDU2xWAOQ3SIchD54xe7p9pOqa2oEyoEzfotGIyRPhLXJyjGV0S/U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=WFQEoLgU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="WFQEoLgU" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1FF352C7; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 18:09:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ShVBfdm/GqZLjsBVyCZGlPIe1TpTZm0hesIObL upIlE=; b=WFQEoLgUb/T2UWexUtq+4pKHUghC5HBJzCtrBzxjKWOyl5T54sQHK/ agVbhfhpoi0gtWCv9YMbuzJ+Bl4fn6kzQW6E0dLstoKQ6XnkoJZX7Vq/zNFG/BZE HLIlGf5LawYf8kBtK+hHbZgTY1IrHI+VQHuS1sWffiIBsNOUsKRsM= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2254B352C6; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 18:09:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.120.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F4F9352C5; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 18:09:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "brian m. carlson" , Justin Tobler , Josh Steadmon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Stop relying on SHA1 fallback for `the_hash_algo` In-Reply-To: (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Tue, 23 Apr 2024 07:07:20 +0200") References: Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 15:09:43 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DA6B9A92-04E2-11EF-A9A1-25B3960A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Patrick Steinhardt writes: [cc: added Josh as the commit-graph fuzzer was his creation]. > this is the second version of my patch series that causes us to stop > relying on the SHA1 default hash. With this topic merged, 'seen' fails "fuzz smoke test"; I think this https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/8807729398/job/24175445340 is the first merge of this topic into 'seen' where "fuzz smoke test" started failing. With the merge of the topic from 'seen' reverted tentatively, https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/8862811497/job/24336185541 the same test seems happy.