Git Mailing List Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rubén Justo" <rjusto@gmail.com>,
	"Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Phillip Wood" <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>,
	"Patrick Steinhardt" <ps@pks.im>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] add-patch: response to unknown command
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 09:09:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqttjkxiai.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33bb69ad-ec79-4863-97b7-51605b94c9c5@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood's message of "Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:48:13 +0100")

Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:

> There is also a practical argument against using "git diff" to
> generate the expected output as it only works if the diff contains a
> single hunk. If the diff contains more than one hunk "add -p" displays
> them separately.

True, but spliting the output from "git diff" at @@ hunk boundary
lines would allow you to hardcode the assumption that "add -p" shows
each hunk exactly as "git diff" would.  So if we really wanted to
have the convenience that the tests' expectation automatically
follow what "git diff" of the day happens to produce, it is still a
viable approach to use "git diff" output with some post-processing.

Thanks.






  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-29 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-15 19:00 [PATCH] add-patch: response to invalid option Rubén Justo
2024-04-16  5:51 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-04-16 19:11   ` Rubén Justo
2024-04-16  9:41 ` phillip.wood123
2024-04-16 19:24   ` Rubén Justo
2024-04-17  9:37     ` phillip.wood123
2024-04-17 15:05       ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-18 15:11         ` phillip.wood123
2024-04-16 10:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-16 13:56   ` Phillip Wood
2024-04-16 15:22     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-16 15:46       ` Phillip Wood
2024-04-16 16:10         ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-16 19:31   ` Rubén Justo
2024-04-20 11:08 ` [PATCH v2] add-patch: response to invalid command Rubén Justo
2024-04-20 17:53   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-21  9:51   ` [PATCH v3] add-patch: response to unknown command Rubén Justo
2024-04-21 13:18     ` phillip.wood123
2024-04-21 19:37       ` Rubén Justo
2024-04-21 21:52     ` [PATCH v4] " Rubén Justo
2024-04-22 15:50       ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-24 10:15         ` phillip.wood123
2024-04-24 15:35           ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-29  9:48             ` Phillip Wood
2024-04-29 16:09               ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-04-25  1:44       ` Jeff King
2024-04-25  2:15         ` Eric Sunshine
2024-04-25 20:23           ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-25 21:00             ` Eric Sunshine
2024-04-25 21:13               ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-25 21:05             ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-25 22:09               ` Rubén Justo
2024-04-25 22:16                 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-25 23:46                   ` Rubén Justo
2024-04-26  5:39                     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-26 16:26                     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-26 20:21           ` Jeff King
2024-04-25  3:04         ` Rubén Justo
2024-04-26 20:23           ` Jeff King
2024-04-26 20:41             ` Rubén Justo
2024-04-25  8:53         ` phillip.wood123
2024-04-29 18:35       ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Rubén Justo
2024-04-29 18:37         ` [PATCH v5 1/2] add-patch: do not show UI messages on stderr Rubén Justo
2024-04-29 19:24           ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-30 10:52             ` Jeff King
2024-04-30 16:35               ` Rubén Justo
2024-04-30 17:17                 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-30 17:11               ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-30 14:47           ` phillip.wood123
2024-04-30 16:38             ` Rubén Justo
2024-05-01 15:39               ` phillip.wood123
2024-05-01 16:14                 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-01 21:13                   ` Rubén Justo
2024-05-02 16:38                     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-29 18:37         ` [PATCH v5 2/2] add-patch: response to unknown command Rubén Justo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqttjkxiai.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=rjusto@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).