From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02520C7EE20 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 16:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229490AbjDZQqR (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Apr 2023 12:46:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48710 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233355AbjDZQqP (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Apr 2023 12:46:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com (mail-pf1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30F437D84 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-63b5c48ea09so6063844b3a.1 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:46:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1682527571; x=1685119571; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=/9aeotcW3Hk4dAPqFGJ+kGsngLM5HU71nAeTPpSGeCk=; b=bQ8c9l2H5MXUGOOPnOUEOIw79YezcSzgQz1rlNAPqAm1iOvUVFYeZ0OyPp4sarVotz J4jX4QdsxEb3jUTyKn6sDpd72hOfzWqR0Mc5iq1sDW1zS+NK4CXLdCwbu9AX1GA020lJ 5hCoYSdDC/yDc9kBZrRFu5e0X4K5sV3Ri/CYsX46UH0yz+Qv2f/3OZNiZuIjlLLAbWs4 9YX2rB702I3SBPXORak7R+NvAZF3DzKQv9CX/JRgDmSSAJ12pqqWGQSNoyiSsx+Ykj5/ v2pnpmGXDcZLW1LfOYd4nFq1l9zuJCj8nIqFLVjIDCSMTDh+QebcEK55ejvgR3IlnR/8 U4LA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1682527571; x=1685119571; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/9aeotcW3Hk4dAPqFGJ+kGsngLM5HU71nAeTPpSGeCk=; b=H3kAHxaXl31BW9aieLNLREZAxcjbU9HIGEpnxUJjuoVUvxT8a1fYesIRMaT3BElo1U wnckd0ajF1H8UP7y68EZnD2QH28GNX2lmqBXihYMyvX27o8iFxE6TblEEMmzyKopV6Jf 8skc6NrAC+bxIjGEW1+2ejn4vJOPMKQTCm7C7yRYUXb/zFJlk2J0VPLiFw4pM4mIJvRb QbGrJfVRUROwnHD9FtZlmACRbb8g1CjuvNK7IEqbgF63MvQUVpj+CiD7x6MT29tp+1us 4ciJR768BpL6TXRgQDg4YCwVVRnJNMnt8CJtZ3+uRMHlJ04X+QOV6ZkCkP++0sj1v38p fL6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9fyCl+LAi6ppnBx9fB6StfoNavG8poNx2tAlXicZ1F7+AErtwBt 0398pxV8W2EI2C3s1PwEUko= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350Z9KxiVKd7rGPhAdUOBsWbtriurVG3T3pUgVNlzGgBOqCv3KjmSvtNu78KA8LK4s6UFvyFPiQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1996:b0:5e0:a86:a76f with SMTP id d22-20020a056a00199600b005e00a86a76fmr31397454pfl.0.1682527571564; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:46:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (187.137.203.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.203.137.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c14-20020a62f84e000000b00625037cf695sm11436321pfm.86.2023.04.26.09.46.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:46:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: "Pooyan Khanjankhani via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Pooyan Khanjankhani , Pooyan Khanjankhani Subject: Re: [PATCH] revisions.txt: correct a mistake in dotted range notations section References: Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:46:10 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Pooyan Khanjankhani via GitGitGadget's message of "Wed, 26 Apr 2023 07:44:41 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Pooyan Khanjankhani via GitGitGadget" writes: > $ git log A..B C..D > > does *not* specify two revision ranges for most commands. Instead > it will name a single connected set of commits, i.e. those that are > -reachable from either B or D but are reachable from neither A or C. > +reachable from either B or D but are not reachable from neither A or C. > In a linear history like this: > > ---A---B---o---o---C---D > > because A and B are reachable from C, the revision range specified > by these two dotted ranges is a single commit D. Isn't that an unwanted double negative? The first hit I got about "neither double negation" on Google search was: https://www.grammar-monster.com/lessons/either_or_neither_nor_double_negative.htm but the source of this might sound more authoritative: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/neither-neither-nor-and-not-either_2