From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] diff: fix interaction between the "-s" option and other options
Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 21:26:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqjzxgzua0.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6459c31038e81_7c68294ee@chronos.notmuch
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>> > Is it though?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> If the proposed log message says "as intended", the author thinks it
>> is.
>
> The question is not if the author of the patch thinks this is the way
> `-s` is intended to work, the question is if this is the way `-s` is
> intended to work.
The "author" refers to the author of the "proposed log message" of
the patch in question, i.e. me in this case. The author of the
patch under discussion thinks it is, so asking "Is it?", implying
you do not agree, is nothing but a rhetorical question, and doing
so, without explaining why, wastes time on both sides.
I am not interested in getting involved in unproductive arguments
with you (or with anybody else for that matter). I've been giving
you benefit of doubt, but I'll go back to refrain from responding to
your message, unless it is a patch that I can say "I agree 100% with
what the proposed log message says and what the patch text does,
looking great, thanks. Will queue." to, which has been my default
stance.
Past experience tells me that to any review other than "100% good",
I would see responses in an unpleasant and hostile manner. Anything
that asks clarification for something unclear in your patch, or
suggests alternatives or improvements. And it led to unproductive
and irritating waste of time number of times, and eventually you
were asked to leave the development community for at least a few
times.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-10 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-03 13:41 [PATCH] t4013: add expected failure for "log --patch --no-patch" Sergey Organov
2023-05-03 16:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-03 17:31 ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-03 18:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-03 18:32 ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-03 19:49 ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-04 15:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-04 18:24 ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-04 20:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-04 21:37 ` Re* " Junio C Hamano
2023-05-04 23:10 ` [PATCH] diff: fix behaviour of the "-s" option Junio C Hamano
2023-05-05 5:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-05 16:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-09 1:16 ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-05 8:32 ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-05 16:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-05 17:07 ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-05 16:59 ` [PATCH v2] diff: fix interaction between the "-s" option and other options Junio C Hamano
2023-05-05 17:41 ` Eric Sunshine
2023-05-05 19:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-05 21:19 ` [PATCH 0/2] dirstat: leakfix Junio C Hamano
2023-05-05 21:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] diff: refactor common tail part of dirstat computation Junio C Hamano
2023-05-05 21:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] diff: plug leaks in dirstat Junio C Hamano
2023-05-09 0:38 ` [PATCH v2] diff: fix interaction between the "-s" option and other options Felipe Contreras
2023-05-09 1:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-09 3:50 ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-10 4:26 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-05-10 23:16 ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-10 23:41 ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-11 1:25 ` Jeff King
2023-05-13 3:07 ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-11 1:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-13 5:32 ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-09 1:34 ` [PATCH] t4013: add expected failure for "log --patch --no-patch" Felipe Contreras
2023-05-10 13:54 ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-10 21:54 ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-09 1:03 ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-04 18:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-04 18:26 ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-09 1:07 ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-10 13:40 ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-10 21:39 ` Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqjzxgzua0.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).