From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jacob Abel <jacobabel@nullpo.dev>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Eric Sunshine" <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
"Phillip Wood" <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>,
"Rubén Justo" <rjusto@gmail.com>, "Taylor Blau" <me@ttaylorr.com>,
rsbecker@nexbridge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] worktree: Support `--orphan` when creating new worktrees
Date: Mon, 01 May 2023 14:51:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqcz3j4t68.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wk2wpftowc7wqeaqrylxq7eci4bkmuffwu75h4qugxulcgsk2b@gw6ouq3g5g2j> (Jacob Abel's message of "Thu, 20 Apr 2023 03:05:35 +0000")
Jacob Abel <jacobabel@nullpo.dev> writes:
> I've noticed on the lore that this revision didn't continue the existing
> thread[1] for the patchset. It seems this is because the `In-Reply-To`
> header was stripped from the message due to a bug with the MTA/mail bridge
> I use on my dev machine [2].
>
> Apologies for any confusion this may have caused.
>
> For continuity purposes I can either:
>
> A. RESEND the revision to the main thread with a note in the cover letter
> tagging the discussions from this thread so far.
>
> B. Reply to [1] in the main thread to point to this thread and then
> eventually publish v10 in reply to that reply message in the main thread.
>
> C. Reply to [1] in the main thread to point to this thread and then
> eventually publish v10 in reply to this cover letter.
>
> Let me know which would be the least disruptive/most ideal way forward or
> if there is another way I should approach this.
>
> Thanks.
>
> 1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/20230109173227.29264-1-jacobabel@nullpo.dev/
> 2. https://github.com/ProtonMail/proton-bridge/issues/374
Once the thread is broken, it is broken. You gave a link in the
message I am responding to, to make it easier for people to go back
to earlier iterations and that is good enough, I think.
Your eventual v10 can be sent with its cover set as a reply to the
cover of v9 and we will be fine.
It seems that we may need another iteration, but if I reclal
correctly what remains are all minor issues?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-01 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-17 9:33 [PATCH v9 0/8] worktree: Support `--orphan` when creating new worktrees Jacob Abel
2023-04-17 9:33 ` [PATCH v9 1/8] worktree add: include -B in usage docs Jacob Abel
2023-04-17 9:33 ` [PATCH v9 2/8] t2400: print captured git output when finished Jacob Abel
2023-04-17 21:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-18 3:53 ` Jacob Abel
2023-04-18 16:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-19 13:23 ` Jacob Abel
2023-04-19 13:36 ` Jacob Abel
2023-04-19 15:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-19 16:50 ` Jacob Abel
2023-04-17 9:33 ` [PATCH v9 3/8] t2400: refactor "worktree add" opt exclusion tests Jacob Abel
2023-04-17 21:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-20 2:46 ` Jacob Abel
2023-04-17 9:34 ` [PATCH v9 4/8] t2400: add tests to verify --quiet Jacob Abel
2023-04-17 21:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-20 2:48 ` Jacob Abel
2023-04-17 9:34 ` [PATCH v9 5/8] worktree add: add --orphan flag Jacob Abel
2023-04-17 9:34 ` [PATCH v9 6/8] worktree add: introduce "try --orphan" hint Jacob Abel
2023-04-17 9:34 ` [PATCH v9 7/8] worktree add: extend DWIM to infer --orphan Jacob Abel
2023-04-17 9:34 ` [PATCH v9 8/8] worktree add: emit warn when there is a bad HEAD Jacob Abel
2023-04-20 3:05 ` [PATCH v9 0/8] worktree: Support `--orphan` when creating new worktrees Jacob Abel
2023-05-01 21:51 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-05-02 5:48 ` Jacob Abel
2023-05-17 21:47 ` [RESEND PATCH v10 " Jacob Abel
2023-05-17 21:48 ` [RESEND PATCH v10 1/8] worktree add: include -B in usage docs Jacob Abel
2023-05-17 21:48 ` [RESEND PATCH v10 2/8] t2400: cleanup created worktree in test Jacob Abel
2023-05-17 21:48 ` [RESEND PATCH v10 3/8] t2400: refactor "worktree add" opt exclusion tests Jacob Abel
2023-05-17 21:48 ` [RESEND PATCH v10 4/8] t2400: add tests to verify --quiet Jacob Abel
2023-05-17 21:48 ` [RESEND PATCH v10 5/8] worktree add: add --orphan flag Jacob Abel
2023-05-17 21:48 ` [RESEND PATCH v10 6/8] worktree add: introduce "try --orphan" hint Jacob Abel
2023-05-17 21:48 ` [RESEND PATCH v10 7/8] worktree add: extend DWIM to infer --orphan Jacob Abel
2023-08-09 6:47 ` RESEND [PATCH " Teng Long
2023-08-11 17:43 ` Jacob Abel
2023-05-17 21:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v10 8/8] worktree add: emit warn when there is a bad HEAD Jacob Abel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqcz3j4t68.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jacobabel@nullpo.dev \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=rjusto@gmail.com \
--cc=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).