From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Kousik Sanagavarapu <five231003@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
Hariom Verma <hariom18599@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ref-filter: add new "describe" atom
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 11:56:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq351pm2ai.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZLLkZ4Vx2quwWwRz@five231003> (Kousik Sanagavarapu's message of "Sat, 15 Jul 2023 23:54:39 +0530")
Kousik Sanagavarapu <five231003@gmail.com> writes:
> conveys it better or is it too much unnecessary stuff to and should we
> just do
>
> struct {
> const char **describe_args;
> } describe;
>
> leaving the describe_opts array as is and changing the how the switch is
> written.
I think this struct can be replaced with a single
const char **describe_args;
and then
>> > +static int describe_atom_parser(struct ref_format *format UNUSED,
>> > + struct used_atom *atom,
>> > + const char *arg, struct strbuf *err)
>> > +{
>> > + const char *describe_opts[] = {
>> > + "",
>> > + "tags",
>> > + "abbrev",
>> > + "match",
>> > + "exclude",
>> > + NULL
>> > + };
this array can simply go away. Then you can
>> > + struct strvec args = STRVEC_INIT;
>> > + for (;;) {
>> > + int found = 0;
>> > + const char *argval;
>> > + size_t arglen = 0;
>> > + int optval = 0;
>> > + int opt;
>> > +
>> > + if (!arg)
>> > + break;
>> > +
>> > + for (opt = D_BARE; !found && describe_opts[opt]; opt++) {
rewrite this "for" loop plus the "switch" inside to an if/else
if/else cascade:
if (match_atom_bool_arg(arg, "tags", &arg, &optval)) {
... do "tags" thing ...
} else if (match_atom_arg_value(arg, "abbrev", ...)) {
... do "abbrev" thing ...
} else if ...
That way, you do not need any enum anywhere and there is no reason
to have desribe_opts[] array, either.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-15 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-05 17:57 [PATCH 0/2] Add new "describe" atom Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-05 17:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] ref-filter: add " Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-06 16:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-07-09 6:16 ` Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-05 17:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] t6300: run describe atom tests on a different repo Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-14 19:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Add new "describe" atom Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-14 19:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] ref filter: add multiple-option parsing functions Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-14 19:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ref-filter: add new "describe" atom Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-14 20:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-07-15 18:24 ` Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-15 18:56 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-07-14 19:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] t6300: run describe atom tests on a different repo Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-19 16:15 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Add new "describe" atom Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-19 16:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ref-filter: add multiple-option parsing functions Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-19 23:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-07-20 5:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-07-20 16:52 ` Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-20 17:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-07-20 17:42 ` Glen Choo
2023-07-20 20:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-07-21 18:26 ` Glen Choo
2023-07-19 16:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ref-filter: add new "describe" atom Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-19 22:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-07-20 22:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Add " Junio C Hamano
2023-07-20 23:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-07-21 4:17 ` Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-23 16:19 ` [PATCH v4 " Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-23 16:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ref-filter: add multiple-option parsing functions Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-24 17:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-07-24 18:12 ` Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-24 20:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-07-25 19:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-07-23 16:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ref-filter: add new "describe" atom Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-24 17:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-07-25 20:51 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] Add " Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-25 20:51 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] ref-filter: add multiple-option parsing functions Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-25 20:51 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] ref-filter: add new "describe" atom Kousik Sanagavarapu
2023-07-25 21:46 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] Add " Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq351pm2ai.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=five231003@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hariom18599@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).