From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD49FC001B0 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 17:53:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236699AbjHKRxm (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:53:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34870 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235912AbjHKRxl (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:53:41 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C2BD273E for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:53:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB7018D82D; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:53:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=9SoifHvfK69brnEW+Rw+Xhw9IRBBBKKBEh0QJQ rdWOw=; b=SI2tftZ8wz4HqDO7jXN/TnMFuJF9rP7OfFzx+VZsZ71wyul4hEejx4 VW+L0w4TkyrbyhaNsppaYw211HKWRSbsAzJjR7P/3VSKSe6+cJ8/otT5cRDFvXAH syIGgrhMaResq2XrWsMsVpnrZH4isNqVsV1Dn7qLfyzaKnsgQla0M= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DD218D82C; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:53:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.83.58.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11EDF18D82B; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:53:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Linus Arver Cc: Oswald Buddenhagen , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Re* [PATCH v3 2/2] doc: revert: add discussion References: <20230428083528.1699221-1-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> <20230809171531.2564807-1-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> <20230809171531.2564807-2-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:53:37 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:44:50 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: FFE726BE-386F-11EE-8F66-307A8E0A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > + > + if (starts_with(msg.subject, "Reapply \"Reapply \"")) > + /* fifth time is too many - force reference format*/ > + use_reference = 1; Come to think of it, as the documentation patch in the series cited double reapply as too unwieldy, we probably should stop before producing such commit. We can update "Reapply \"Reapply" above to "Revert \"Reapply" and then "fifth" -> "fourth". The test update below must also be adjusted, if we want to take that route.